- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,077
- Reaction score
- 6,195
At the end CM says Casey can't go outside because 'we won'. No that's not it, Casey can't go outside because everybody knows she killed Caylee, and you 'winning' didn't change that opinion.
At the end CM says Casey can't go outside because 'we won'. No that's not it, Casey can't go outside because everybody knows she killed Caylee, and you 'winning' didn't change that opinion.
Cheney Mason on CNN tonite,whining about poor,poor Casey,still reviled,and can't go out in public,even after 2 years.I didn't realize just how upset I still am over this case,I was yelling my TV.Poor Casey,my butt.How about poor,poor Caylee?
At the end CM says Casey can't go outside because 'we won'. No that's not it, Casey can't go outside because everybody knows she killed Caylee, and you 'winning' didn't change that opinion.
It was because she had a $$$ hearing today, yeah, nobody is stopping Casey from getting a job and getting on with her life except Casey, no sympathy here either. She just wants to be able to have a 'fresh start' so she can write her book and make a million (so she thinks).
It's been exactly 2 years today since the justice system failed Caylee. Although her entire family has moved on, we haven't forgotten.
It's been exactly 2 years today since the justice system failed Caylee. Although her entire family has moved on, we haven't forgotten.
It is my opinion, based on the documents in evidence, that Baez NEVER had a Retainer Agreement with Casey Anthony in the amount of $ 500,000.00. Never happened. No evidence of that.
Casey Anthony NEVER had enough money nor assets to support the idea that she EVER signed a Retainer Agreement in the amount of $ 500,000.00.
When Casey Anthony was arrested, July 16, 2008, she filled out an application for INDIGENCY and asked for, and got appointment of a PUBLIC DEFENDER, because she had NO MONEY. She wrote that she had $ 1,200 in savings [George said that Baez said she had $ 1,400], and NO ASSETS or INCOME.
She has said since 2009 up until the current bankruptcy case that she is NOT selling her story and has no deals. So, how would she EVER pay Baez $ 500,000.00 or any portion thereof?
Casey Anthony signed an Affidavit March 3, 2010, for the Indigency Hearing, stating she nor Baez were selling her story. So, how would she pay $ 500,000?
Judge Stan Strickland saw the Retainer Agreement during the side conference on March 25, 2009. What was the amount on that Retainer Agreement?
Casey Anthony stated, under oath, on March 25, 2009, that she signed only ONE Retainer Agreement.
George told Detectives with the Orange County Sheriff's Office, on July 24, 2008, that Baez told George, on the day of the Bond Hearing - July 22, 2008, that Casey Anthony hired Baez and told him she had $ 5,000 [NOT $ 500,000], and had $ 1,400 now and would pay the rest [of the $ 5,000], when she got out of this.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIS0pOVTBGWFQ4OFk/edit?usp=sharing
GEORGE ANTHONY INTERVIEW July 24, 2008
She reaps what she sows
IMO
I am curious WHY Mason felt the need to go on NTL media show and discuss her? Now.
Her criminal trial and subsequent appeals are long over, so why this public relations interview? it's not the first time Mason has done this.
She/her team wants the BK judge to grant her Bankruptcy filing
I have a strong feeling it's all part of a larger strategy in regards to her BK
:twocents:
It seems to always be a part of a bigger picture. Ulterior motive...
And I wonder what goes on in their heads when they go on national tv, talk highly of this, knowing what we know and have heard, read in the evidence, and still attempt to convince us that she's America's sweetheart, and want us to ingratiate fca into our lives... Do they think we're stupid? Or can't read? Or that anyone is ever going to believe, and accept, a pathological liar into our hearts? With all that we know, and they know we know this, they still think poor fca is being unfairly treated, and lash out at us... I seriously wonder sometimes if their intellectual meter is working... It's insulting...
Just have to give kudos to James Patterson who makes a veiled reference to not only CA, but her "ad hominem" attacking attorney in his latest Women's Murder Club mystery.
No, CA may not be today's news...but the "world" will never forget what happened to Caylee.
Nothing gets by us, Pattymarie.Wow...I just finished this book and noticed the same reference as well! I re-read it several times over. I even looked up the term "ad hominem" just to double check that I was reading his reference correctly. (I was). Kudos again to him. He recognized what went down.
(And on a side note, I finished the book on the flight into SFO just one week ago today...terrible tragedy)