- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
- Messages
- 3,302
- Reaction score
- 34,541
I finally got a response to my email from yesterday. No one is available to email them to me until Monday. Sorry. Not happy about it at all but out of my hands.
Holy moly beach
I finally got a response to my email from yesterday. No one is available to email them to me until Monday. Sorry. Not happy about it at all but out of my hands.
The following are my thoughts – not facts.
MS hired CWW and promised to pay him a substantial amount from the life insurance proceeds. They're such lifelong buddypals, two sides of the same coin, twins separated at birth, soulmates, whatever they are, there was no need to speak of specific amounts between them. That CWW testified that they didn't discuss a set amount doesn't bother me.
JRR was not involved in the private, two-hour planning session the night before the wedding.
CWW hired JRR to help with driving such a long distance in a short period of time. A fee of $10,000 was promised to JRR for his participation in the entire trip plus the help with the murder if needed (evidently it was). I don't discount the idea that CWW also wanted the company of his protege.
I don't believe there was any communication between MS and JRR. I think CWW made another judgement error involving JRR and telling him too much. He would have been better off hiring a stranger who knew nothing of MS. Luckily for prosecution, CWW told him too much and JRR confessed to his gf.
MS sent some cash before the murder trip to help with travel expenses and incidentals – a little carrot to dangle – a taste of the riches to come. I also believe MS left more cash for CWW and possibly JRR too at the murder scene.
I believe that if JRR goes to trial, his defense will raise the potential mitigation of JRR being a bit of a victim of CWW. A rudderless follower in need of a father-figure and CWW took full advantage of that weakness. JRR was deluded enough to think he was doing right by the mother of his child and future family security by earning money even if it was by murdering someone. CWW: “You've supporting a girlfriend, her two children and you have your own child on the way. Think of what you can do for your family with this kind of money!”
I believe that JRR is oddly, the most normal of them all. I believe that his life could have gone another way had he not met CWW. He may have been a thief before this, but not violent like CWW and MS.
TaySho has some sense of what's right, but I can't get past knowing she was a-ok with him going off to commit burglaries– felonies that would put him back in prison even if he'd never left the state. In another state no less, another violation. JRR took a major gamble and it failed. Better to be in prison for parole violation and robbery than for murdering someone for money. Better to have had a gf who begged him not to go or say that she would leave him if he risked their future by committing any crime at all. Oh, well.
4. CURTIS WAYNE WRIGHT further proffered, “I didn’t really have any plans of getting
any of it. Whatever he did was, you know, was with -with Jimmy [sic].” See p73 ln5-7
of Defendant’s Exhibit 5.
JR was paying for everything in his household and she depended on him to provide. That brings another topic into play regarding morals but it is what it is.......I feel really bad for the little children of hers ......
Holy moly beachno need to apologize for anything you have no control over! We're all thankful for what you're doing :loveyou:
A text message exchange between the father and one of his daughters weeks before the slaying released by the state attorney's office alludes to the tension.
"Mommy is not being nice she just combed my hair! Hard. And will not let me talk to you," the preteen girl wrote.
Mark Sievers, who was with a family member at the time, responded with: "Call me."
Four minutes later, she wrote: "sorry for hanging up but I did not think mom would want to hear what I was going to say love you."
He said he loved her and reminded her: "I cannot call you. You must call me when you want to talk. Remember, I love you baby and follow the Golden rule with you and your sister and of course mommy too."
http://www.naplesnews.com/news/crim...he-head-with-a-hammer-384324291.html?d=mobile
Really. The level of manipulation here is insane.![]()
bbm^ AZLawyer I love it when you post on threads other than just "legal questions." Sometimes we have to see this case through other means than "just legal procedures." I can see where these minors were "encouraged to report all of their complaints to Super Daddy". I can just visualize a child who didn't want their hair combed saying, "Ouch, I'm going to tell my Dad on you!!" I have the feeling TS was being "undermined" even as she tried to do the basics of being a Mother. Making a phone call "to tell" on the Mother? Deplorable. History in the making, huh?? Parental boundaries being challenged...perhaps more often than we will ever know.A text message exchange between the father and one of his daughters weeks before the slaying released by the state attorney's office alludes to the tension.
"Mommy is not being nice she just combed my hair! Hard. And will not let me talk to you," the preteen girl wrote.
Mark Sievers, who was with a family member at the time, responded with: "Call me."
Four minutes later, she wrote: "sorry for hanging up but I did not think mom would want to hear what I was going to say love you."
He said he loved her and reminded her: "I cannot call you. You must call me when you want to talk. Remember, I love you baby and follow the Golden rule with you and your sister and of course mommy too."
http://www.naplesnews.com/news/crim...he-head-with-a-hammer-384324291.html?d=mobile
Really. The level of manipulation here is insane.![]()
bbm^ AZLawyer I love it when you post on threads other than just "legal questions." Sometimes we have to see this case through other means than "just legal procedures." I can see where these minors were "encouraged to report all of their complaints to Super Daddy". I can just visualize a child who didn't want their hair combed saying, "Ouch, I'm going to tell my Dad on you!!" I have the feeling TS was being "undermined" even as she tried to do the basics of being a Mother. Making a phone call "to tell" on the Mother? Deplorable. History in the making, huh??
I can tell you from a "MOM's" stand point, that would happen ONLY ONE TIME IN MY HOUSE. My son called me to complain about his teacher when he was 10 years old. I said, "I'll be come right over!" I walked into my son's classroom wearing my over-sized pink chenille house robe, faux fur jaguar house slippers, plaid Joe Boxer pj bottoms, my hair in multi-colored jumbo curlers and NO make up! I asked the teacher if I could sit in the class for a while....OMG...my son NEVER called to complain about a teacher again! Guess he decided it was a lot less embarrassing to behave than have me show up like that ever again! (Mods...ok to delete if too O/T or not appropriate)
"Mommy is not being nice she just combed my hair! Hard. And will not let me talk to you," the preteen girl wrote.
Mark Sievers, who was with a family member at the time, responded with: "Call me."
Four minutes later, she wrote: "sorry for hanging up but I did not think mom would want to hear what I was going to say love you."
He said he loved her and reminded her: "I cannot call you. You must call me when you want to talk. Remember, I love you baby and follow the Golden rule with you and your sister and of course mommy too."
Oh my!bbm^ AZLawyer I love it when you post on threads other than just "legal questions." Sometimes we have to see this case through other means than "just legal procedures." I can see where these minors were "encouraged to report all of their complaints to Super Daddy". I can just visualize a child who didn't want their hair combed saying, "Ouch, I'm going to tell my Dad on you!!" I have the feeling TS was being "undermined" even as she tried to do the basics of being a Mother. Making a phone call "to tell" on the Mother? Deplorable. History in the making, huh?? Parental boundaries being challenged...perhaps more often than we will ever know.
I can tell you from a "MOM's" stand point, that would happen ONLY ONE TIME IN MY HOUSE. My son called me to complain about his teacher when he was 10 years old. I said, "I'll be come right over!" I walked into my son's classroom wearing my over-sized pink chenille house robe, faux fur jaguar house slippers, plaid Joe Boxer pj bottoms, my hair in multi-colored jumbo curlers and NO make up! I asked the teacher if I could sit in the class for a while....OMG...my son NEVER called to complain about a teacher again! Guess he decided it was a lot less embarrassing to behave than have me show up like that ever again! (Mods...ok to delete if too O/T or not appropriate)
Yes, interesting. Got me curious.RSBM:
Now, wonder what this bit means? Why was he not allowed to call the kids? Why can they only call him? Hmmm.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
bbm^ AZLawyer I love it when you post on threads other than just "legal questions." Sometimes we have to see this case through other means than "just legal procedures." I can see where these minors were "encouraged to report all of their complaints to Super Daddy". I can just visualize a child who didn't want their hair combed saying, "Ouch, I'm going to tell my Dad on you!!" I have the feeling TS was being "undermined" even as she tried to do the basics of being a Mother. Making a phone call "to tell" on the Mother? Deplorable. History in the making, huh?? Parental boundaries being challenged...perhaps more often than we will ever know.
I can tell you from a "MOM's" stand point, that would happen ONLY ONE TIME IN MY HOUSE. My son called me to complain about his teacher when he was 10 years old. I said, "I'll be come right over!" I walked into my son's classroom wearing my over-sized pink chenille house robe, faux fur jaguar house slippers, plaid Joe Boxer pj bottoms, my hair in multi-colored jumbo curlers and NO make up! I asked the teacher if I could sit in the class for a while....OMG...my son NEVER called to complain about a teacher again! Guess he decided it was a lot less embarrassing to behave than have me show up like that ever again! (Mods...ok to delete if too O/T or not appropriate)
LMAO, love your chutzpah! Great way to handle that
I agree Oceanblueyes, there is so much cooberating evidence. JRR nor CWW had any reason to want Teresa dead- Mark DID and I think that will be easily proven. People can connect the dots pretty easily. This is going to be the final instance of Marks complete and utter delusion and it will end up getting him the death penalty. I would imagine the psyche evaluation will be the eye opener that this judge apparently needs. There will be no arguing when that report comes across his desk. MOO of course.
Weeel.I think we'll be seeing some more interesting/odd things in the upcoming documents. Here are a couple of things from an article here:
http://www.abc-7.com/story/32302418/sievers-files-motions-for-wright-testimony-wifes-cell-data
"Deleted messages between Mark and Curtis' mother-in-law."
"Two months before the murder, KM alluded to their relationship saying they never meant to hurt each other." - "They" - they who? :thinking:
"And a sentimental note via text, Mark thanks Teresa's mother, Mimi, saying if it wasn't for her, they wouldn't still be together." This one was a month before the murder of her TS.
Mark used to date Angela's mother, was she talking about that relationship?
Mark used to date Angela's mother, was she talking about that relationship?
ARgh - so confusing those relationships - bordering on incest of a sortI thought he dated/was engaged to AW's aunt? She even had the wedding dress and she wore it a couple years later when she married a nice man.
:banghead:
