YellowDog
New Member
And were they walking toward the bridge or away from the bridge when they were shot?
Is that known?
Is that known?
A closer look at the records indicates the man from Phoenix and the man from Gore are not the same man.
The Oklahoma man has a DOB of December 30, 1960 and was listed as living in Gore on October 14, 1999. His traffic offense occurred June 18, of 1989. His initial appearance was August 7 of 1989 and he was arraigned on August 9.
Since Fritz was incarcerated in AZ in 1999, he could not have been residing in Oklahoma. Also, Fritz DOB is November 7 of 1961.
The man in OK has middle initial "C," like the AZ man, however, a further search of area records indicates the "C" does not stand for Charles, but probably for Christopher. There is nothing in the records to indicate extradition, warrants, or a temporary release that would link these two individuals
Sorry to throw a wrench into that angle, but it doesn't seem to jive, at least IMO.
I think you are right that we need to keep an open mind about that theory. As more and more things come out in the Brooke Bennett case, we can see that veil of secrecy can exist for years no matter how bad the abuses are. While it may or may not be possible of the family, it is something to consider in this case. The girls were both in the same age frame as the perps' choice for victims. Sexual abuse happens in 1-4 children.To be perfectly honest, I'm not even sure what I think happened at this point. I did want to mention something though. I know people have discussed previously the thought that maybe one or both of the girls were going to tell about being molested. Anyone who mentioned that seemed to be flamed because the families appear very loving and caring. The thing I wanted to bring up was that if there was molestation, it doesn't mean it was by family! It could have been by any number of people who aren't related. Just a thought to bring up another angle in a way that may not get flamed.
According to reports from the OSBI, they were assumed to be walking away from the bridge.And were they walking toward the bridge or away from the bridge when they were shot?
Is that known?
And were they walking toward the bridge or away from the bridge when they were shot?
Is that known?
Wasn't it stated shot in the chest and head?They had already been to the bridge and were on their way home.
Many of us believe they were shot from the front, but, honestly, I don't remember if that information has been confirmed.
Wasn't it stated shot in the chest and head?
Has it ever come out whether the bodies were lying face up or face down in the ditch?
It seems to me, if they were walking back toward the house and shot from the front that they would have fallen backwards from the blow of the shots and would have seen their shooters. If shot from the back, they probably would have fallen face down into the ground from the blow and might never have seen anyone.
OSBI/LE said chest and head. The ME said FACE and CHEST.They had already been to the bridge and were on their way home.
Many of us believe they were shot from the front, but, honestly, I don't remember if that information has been confirmed.
It's an odd thing that, often when people are shot from the front, they pitch forward. The girls were found face down.
That's interesting Claycat. I would think, if shot in the chest, they might lunge forward but, if shot directly in the head, it seems like it would throw them backwards. I still think it's strange that the grandfather didn't hear anything. I could understand not hearing one shot, but a series of shots would be hard to miss. Maybe they had silencers on the guns but I doubt it.
Hi Everyone! Hi Claycat!
Claycat~
I wondered if you had any more feelings or ideas about this? Especially a possible motive? I am still stumped.