oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,785
I think you are right that we need to keep an open mind about that theory. As more and more things come out in the Brooke Bennett case, we can see that veil of secrecy can exist for years no matter how bad the abuses are. While it may or may not be possible of the family, it is something to consider in this case. The girls were both in the same age frame as the perps' choice for victims. Sexual abuse happens in 1-4 children.
A SO will take drastic measures to avoid jailtime. Could the perp have abused one or both of them at a different time and decided he needed to silence them? Yes and it would make this perp even harder to find unless he has a record already or someone names him.
I would like to know who the girls were around the last month before their deaths. Uncles, cousins, other men in general, etc. I can't recall who kept asking that question before. It is a good one.
I suppose you are right but I just believe anyone that was close around the girls before this happened would be the first ones that OSBI would rule out or rule in. They may not have had to go that far if they suspected prior molestation though because the ME could readily ascertain if either girl even ever had sex or if the ME was of the opinion that there was prior molestation involved when they did the autopsy almost a month ago. On that they would not have to wait for results but would know when the ME did the visual examinations.
With it being now a month I just don't think it is the motive in this case. More and more I see these murders as totally senseless and the motive will be equally senseless, as senseless as the day I first heard about them and I think that is why OSBI is taking longer to solve the case due to the very good possibility imo that there is no link between the killer and the children.
imoo