Small Details that are interesting in the Cooper Harris case, #2

[Elley Mae]

I think of sexting as kind of new-age . The younger generation is used to more stimulation than any others before them; can you envision young men brought up on very realistic video and role-playing games settling for looking at pictures, when they can ramp it up with technology? Sexting is primarily a younger person type of thing, but I would definitely still consider it as . Older people may not use their phones as much, but they still get on forums and join adult sites to accomplish the same effect.

Based on what we know of RH, I just can't see him wanting to kill his son so he could be free to meet up with women he had sex chats with. That just sounds really absurd, and again, sounds like a theory developed by someone who doesn't understand where our culture has evolved. I am in no way saying that I agree with it, but it is what it is.

As far as the cops and their reactions to the sex texts, who knows? Like so many other things surrounding this case--we just don't.

1 bbm I don't

2 bbm orange Is this fact, Link please, or just your opine.

3 bbm I don't think sexting is just a young person thing and I would never consider sexting and as one in the same, never.

 

[Elley Mae]

Exactly! is a depiction of erotic acts.

Sexting is not , even though engaging in such can sometimes involve pornographic pictures.

is about viewing images that are sexually exciting (but technically considered offensive to the general public, that is the definiton of ); sexting is about interacting with another in a sexually exciting/explicit way in order to stimulate the other to....errrmmmm...nough said.

Two totally different things.

This is what I wanted to say. lol Thanks for saying this, it's exactly what I wanted to say.

 

[gngr~snap]

1 bbm I don't

2 bbm orange Is this fact, Link please, or just your opine.

3 bbm I don't think sexting is just a young person thing and I would never consider sexting and as one in the same, never.

"The younger generation is used to more stimulation than any others before them

"We are lonely but fearful of intimacy. Digital connections offer the illusion of companionship without the demands of friendship. We expect more from technology and less from each other”.

http://joekraus.com/were-creating-a-culture-of-distraction

I think they are correct. Laptops and celly tellys are proving to be more valuable than their own children!!!!
This article hurts my
All posts are MOO

 

[Elley Mae]

The younger generation is...

"We are lonely but fearful of intimacy. Digital connections offer the illusion of companionship without the demands of friendship. We expect more from technology and less from each other”.

http://joekraus.com/were-creating-a-culture-of-distraction

All posts are MOO

I appreciate that article, but I don't believe that/it.

 

[Nali87]

Exactly! is a depiction of erotic acts.

Sexting is not , even though engaging in such can sometimes involve pornographic pictures.

is about viewing images that are sexually exciting (but technically considered offensive to the general public, that is the definiton of ); sexting is about interacting with another in a sexually exciting/explicit way in order to stimulate the other to....errrmmmm...nough said.

Two totally different things.

Exactly; watching Playgirl videos = . ( Alone ) Reading 50 shades of gray (which sucks btw) = erotica. ( Alone ) :blushing:

Talking about sex while sending nude pictures of yourself and receiving others from your sexting-partner in return on your phone = sexting.

 

[SmartSassyBBW]

Another baby died in a hot car today.http://usat.ly/1ncBF1Z

 

[MyBelle]

Cell phone companies would prefer this defense of sexting--imagine the consequences to them if underage sexting on their phone equipment was to be considered as ? That could get a little complicated. You're probably right--too much profit to be lost by classifying sexting as ...

And how is life going to get complicated for the cell phone companies? Harris' sexting was released to the media over a month ago. No blame has befallen the phone company so far. Sexting isn't the fault of the phone company, responsibility is totally on the shoulders of the husband, father church-going slacker who did the texts.

JMO, of course.

 

[MyBelle]

Ummmm, so, here's my two cents...does anyone REALLY think that reviewing sexy chats and pics of JRH's stiffy is interesting to anyone?! Cuz I sure dont. And...sorry, but I sincerely doubt anyone who has seen his photo and chooses to continue sexting him is anyone LE would like looking at. Icky.

I doubt any cop, social worker, reporter, doctor or any other professional who is involved in a criminal investigative process involving the death of a child would consider Harris' activities to be "sexy." I think perverted is a better description but that's just my opinion.

 

[Nali87]

And how is life going to get complicated for the cell phone companies? Harris' sexting was released to the media over a month ago. No blame has befallen the phone company so far. Sexting isn't the fault of the phone company, responsibility is totally on the shoulders of the husband, father church-going slacker who did the texts.

JMO, of course.

IKR. Makers of tablets and computers don't suffer any consequences from people looking at on those gadgets. Or having skype sex, DM sex over at Twitter, using let's-hook-up apps like Tinder etc etc.

 

[egg.head]

Hi all, I'm new to WS! Cooper's story caught my interest when it first made national news and I've been following it ever since. I have to say though, the recent slump in updates on the case is disappointing

I think the time Stoddard spent on the details of RH's sexting were done for the "WOW" factor Do you think that someone who browses on a regular basis has the right to accuse a person who sextes of being an immoral person, or maybe just more immoral?

Evie, I thought the sexting part was relevant because it shows how unfit RH is to be a parent. I'm not saying that had RH been busy doing actual work that he was being paid to do, it doesn't make his actions any more excusable. But spending much of his work day sexting suggests that he not only has an addiction, but also a flagrant disregard of his responsibilities. It doesn't help that he comes across as a child predator for soliciting photos from an underage girl (technically child ). JMO

 

[nursebeeme]

​Next personalized post that addresses the postER and not the POST will earn that person a ticket to the timeout chair. Enough already folks! :nurse:​

 

[katydid23]

Oh Oh :nurse:

fftobed:

 

[lightlady]

Hi all, I'm new to WS! Cooper's story caught my interest when it first made national news and I've been following it ever since. I have to say though, the recent slump in updates on the case is disappointing



Evie, I thought the sexting part was relevant because it shows how unfit RH is to be a parent. I'm not saying that had RH been busy doing actual work that he was being paid to do, it doesn't make his actions any more excusable. But spending much of his work day sexting suggests that he not only has an addiction, but also a flagrant disregard of his responsibilities. It doesn't help that he comes across as a child predator for soliciting photos from an underage girl (technically child ). JMO

Welcome, egg.head!! Totally agree, hope we get some new info soon. Glad you joined the conversation! :wagon:

 

[cady]

It would be nice if members would post about the case and not about other members.

I think that it's perfectly fine for people to doubt what police officers say in court. The truth will be found when this case goes to trial and the evidence is made public. JMO.

Yes. Doubt with some basis, however. Apple-picking statistics does not address the particular LEO who is testifying under oath in a Probable Cause Hearing, where the minute details have YET to be discovered. An overwhelming doubt by an observer, of the veracity of LEO's testimony is not a healthy doubt. It is an AGENDA. JMO

 

[AuburnTxTiger]

Yes. Doubt with some basis, however. Apple-picking statistics does not address the particular LEO who is testifying under oath in a Probable Cause Hearing, where the minute details have YET to be discovered. An overwhelming doubt by an observer, of the veracity of LEO's testimony is not a healthy doubt. It is an AGENDA. JMO

Well said. Thanks. I agree totally.

 

[ATasteOfHoney]

Just to add my total comment, since you clipped it to make it look like I was defending someone. I'm discussing my opinion of whether RH murdered his child so he could have sex with strange women--which is one of the theories being bounced around.

My original post, in full: Based on what we know of RH, I just can't see him wanting to kill his son so he could be free to meet up with women he had sex chats with. That just sounds really absurd, and again, sounds like a theory developed by someone who doesn't understand where our culture has evolved. I am in no way saying that I agree with it, but it is what it is.

Sorry you find it insulting to know that so many people you encounter on a daily basis is involved in , sexting and meeting up with women/men they don't know to have sex with. I didn't realize there were people who didn't know that, or maybe I could have found a way to break the truth in a more delicate fashion. Unfortunately, we HAVE to know these facts if we want to form an opinion with a legal basis--and not one based on emotions.

As far as my comments regarding LE, please do a query on police corruption so I won't have to break that news.

I am not defending any one...I was throwing out ideas as to how this whole thing happened, and why it continues to happen over and over again on a regular basis. As I said earlier, when the prosecutor produces evidence that RH started sexting when he entered the car at CFA, and didn't stop until he got in his car at Home Depot to leave work, then we can talk about sexting as the cause of Cooper's death.

[modsnip]

I truly don't believe that the sexting alone was what caused CH's death----that would be too simple of an approach. What I do believe caused the death of CH was the personality disorder that RH has had for many years. The sexting was just a **symptom** of that personality disorder. RH could never get enough attention and adoration; it is always about what he wants, and a "feed" venue for his egotism and selfishness. It is part of RH's personality disorder.
Spending money on things he wants, having a lot of women oogle him, sexual promiscuity, self-absorption: yes, they will all manifest themselves as **symptoms** of a bigger issue.
Sexting is just one of many symptoms.
It alone is not the cause.

moo

 

[MissJ]

We know Cooper "moved" while in the car seat because of banging his head against the back of the car seat and clawing at his face. He probably kicked his legs too, so I'm assuming you meant that your DH moved from one place to another inside the car which set off the alarm?

My post was about people thinking Cooper was not secured in his seat. If he had been unsecured he would have been all over the car and set off the alarm IMO.

 

[CCmakes3]

Cell phone companies would prefer this defense of sexting--imagine the consequences to them if underage sexting on their phone equipment was to be considered as ? That could get a little complicated. You're probably right--too much profit to be lost by classifying sexting as ...

If this were true then why haven't internet providers been charged/sued for people downloading child ?

 

[AuburnTxTiger]

Posted on another thread:

"lndigo


Today should be Cooper's second birthday. "

As a mother and grandmother of 2 (1 is a 26 months old boy) this breaks my heart and brings tears to my eyes. This should have been a day of celebration. My thoughts and prayers so out to CH's family.

 

[Evie Ivy Over]

If this were true then why haven't internet providers been charged/sued for people downloading child ?

That's an interesting question...we have so many government agencies regulating everything, you would think the cyber world would be a little safer. Where's the FCC? They're the watchdog of internet providers. Oh, wait a minute, I think it's actually the other way around.......oops!!