Small Details that are interesting in the Cooper Harris case, #2

[tlcya]

BBM: I was wondering if day care would call/text/email a parent who's child didn't show up. The email was a "group" email, hum, not sure what that means? :waitasec: Would it mean to all parents that are on their email list? Or would it mean only to each parent along with the workers at day care? To me a group email would be to all on the list, but I'm not really sure if The Little Aprons works that way.

I have wondered if the group email thing was something regular, possibly even daily, the center did offering pictures and updates on what your child is doing at daycare today. Which is why I really want to know if there is some electronic indication suggesting that RH read, opened, or even noticed an email sitting in his inbox. Because that SHOULD have been a big cue to think of his son and realize his son was in that tuscon. Why wasn't it? If it was a standard daily "heres what is happening at daycare today" type email, I also want to know did RH typically read those? Was THAT day a deviation? If so why? Because to me if it was his practice to check in via that email on his little buddy and that day he did not that would imply things.

MOO

 

[Hippiemomof5]

I thought I had read somewhere that a friend or family member of Leanna's from Alaska, I believe, said she forwarded the daycare's daily emails with updates and photos of Cooper.

Found it: Cooper was born in August 2012, and the couple bombarded Ms. Apodaca, who lives in Alaska, with photographs and videos of the child. Ms. Harris would even forward Cooper’s daily day care email.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/07/1...rs-role-in-toddlers-death.html?referrer=&_r=0

 

[gngr~snap]

From the looks of the day care, I find it very hard to believe someone wasn't contacted, but looks can be deceiving.

http://www.nilesbolton.com/projects/home-depot-little-apron-academy/
http://www.freespacearchitecture.com/#!little-apron-academy/ce2v

All posts are MOO

 

[human]

In this case the parents were ALL home depot employees! Their email boxes would not likely to be full, and surely not the work email AND the work voicemail. Plus there are automated systems that do notifications these days, I would expect that day care had them as it was top knotch.

The group email could have gone out every day, and it doesn't seem appropriate to send a group email out to parents at 1:30 telling them their children weren't at the facility. On the other hand if they sent a group email out everyday to ALL the parents giving them a generally daily update I could see that being ignored/opened later.

I am talking about calling parents. Their cell phone mailboxes would be full, disconnected or would not take incoming calls.

 

[human]

Wow. What,an incredibly lovely daycare!

 

[Inthedetails]

Wow. What,an incredibly lovely daycare!

I agree. What a wonderful perk for working at HD.

 

[gngr~snap]

Wow. What,an incredibly lovely daycare!

I thinking about calling and asking if I can rent it for a weekend! lol. It looks like a cruise ship or something.

All posts are MOO

 

[Inthedetails]

The little guy standing at the table outdoors by the blue pump reminds me of a precious little someone....

 

[buttonbaby]

maybe if he added a santa hat and smiley on it, he could of considered it art? :santahat:

no smileys were harmed in the making of this post :shame:
did not mean to offend and no underage smileycons were used.
now back to our regular schedule postings :blushing:
sorry for the OT.

I guess he could HAVE considered it art, but alas, he is now in the clink thus the past tense word. I can't imagine anyone wanting to see a picture of his tiny wee wee under any circumstances. UGH.

 

[cady]

I guess he could HAVE considered it art, but alas, he is now in the clink thus the past tense word. I can't imagine anyone wanting to see a picture of his tiny wee wee under any circumstances. UGH.

LOL It still has not been verified that the famous "member" pictures were indeed part of HIS anatomy. Really hilarious if they are not. JMO

 

[SmartSassyBBW]

My thought too. He would be one to talk a "big" game and sending a random pic might be his proof.

 

[Hippiemomof5]

LOL It still has not been verified that the famous "member" pictures were indeed part of HIS anatomy. Really hilarious if they are not. JMO

He used his real name and real photos (of his face/selfies), I highly doubt he was stealing another man's private pics.

I'm editing just to add, this is obviously moo. I don't sext, nor do I think male anatomy is attractive to anyone but males. I'm trying to be polite and remain ladylike, but it's hard in this context to get my point across!

 

[CCmakes3]

Aunt of baby who died in hot car says tragic accident is 'eating away' at infant's family

HURRICANE, Washington County — Skyah Suwyn's bright blue eyes and sweet spirit lit up every room.

The 11-month-old girl, presumed to have died from heat exhaustion Friday afternoon after being left in a car, brought incredible joy to her family, her aunt said Saturday.

The baby's death was a terrible accident that has devastated her sister and her family, Aimee Wright said.

"It was an accident. If people who are being negative could even see how hard she is on herself. If they could see that she keeps saying, 'If only. If only. If only. I wouldn't have been out of my routine that day. If only I had gone to the gym.' She blames it all on herself," Wright said through tears.

Under normal circumstances, April Suwyn takes her sons to a babysitter while she works in the family home doing nails, Wright said. The baby usually sleeps while Suwyn attends to her clients.

On Friday, she dropped off her older sons with Skyah in the car, then returned to the family's home house. There was construction on the street so Suwyn had to parked up the street from their home. She needed to use the restroom so she hurried into the house after parking the car.

Ordinarily, she would then put the baby down for her nap.

"In her mind, she had laid Skyah down for a nap. That was her normal routine before she would start doing nails," Wright said.

Suwyn usually asked a neighbor to watch the baby while she drove a couple blocks to the babysitter's house.

On Friday, she got back in the car and drove to pick up the boys. After walking out of the babysitter's house to her vehicle, she discovered Skyah in the back seat.

Wright said her sister was devastated by the events. Her pain has been compounded by negative comments on the Internet.

"She doesn't need the negative. It's eating her away. It's eating the family away. She's a good mom and she made one simple mistake that she'd take back in a heartbeat," Wright said.

~snipped

Rest of article at link: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...ccident-is-eating-away-at-infants-family.html

I'm sorry, I do believe this one was an accident and I feel badly for the mom, but she was just soooo darn careless and negligent! First of all, I don't care how badly I had to use the bathroom, I would wet AND soil myself before I went inside without my baby, ESPECIALLY if I had to park "up the street," away from my home! Would it bother me to ruin my clothes and walk up the street past construction workers with wet and poopy pants? A little, but in my mind it couldn't be helped. I'm betting no one would even notice, and Thank God for washing machines! I'm pretty sure I've embarrassed myself much worse for lesser reasons. Maybe I'm just a nasty with no pride (or shame)!

Secondly, if she really thought she had put the baby down for a nap, why on earth didn't she check on her/wake her up/ask a neighbor to watch her before leaving to pick up her boys?? Makes me think she may have had a pattern of leaving the baby napping in her crib while she went to pick up her other children. . I know the aunt is trying to facilitate sympathy for the mom, but the details she provides hint at a possible pattern of parental negligence, I'm afraid. The aunt says that the mom accepts blame for the tragedy, so hopefully she has learned an important lesson that will benefit her remaining children. The funding page set up for the family met its goal within 24 hours of the child's death and is still going strong, so the organizers have raised the goal. Perhaps they can put the extra money toward an awareness campaign.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Maybe it's because I'm a guy but it doesn't matter to me if JRH sent a picture of a "tiny" or a "big" male part to the underage girl. It's the fact that he did it that matters to me. It's just wrong and illegal. JMO.

 

[cady]

He used his real name and real photos (of his face/selfies), I highly doubt he was stealing another man's private pics.

I'm editing just to add, this is obviously moo. I don't sext, nor do I think male anatomy is attractive to anyone but males. I'm trying to be polite and remain ladylike, but it's hard in this context to get my point across!

LOL I don't either, plus I'm a luddite, but did the pics show the whole person or a face pic and then the special treat (barf)? JMO ( I'm obviously starved for details in this case!)

 

[cady]

Maybe it's because I'm a guy but it doesn't matter to me if JRH sent a picture of a "tiny" or a "big" male part to the underage girl. It's the fact that he did it that matters to me. It's just wrong and illegal. JMO.

You are right, Ranch. But I sort of doubt that men with wee ones advertise them. To me it's laughable that anyone would want to advertise at all, but that's just me. Men who do advertise seem to think that it is "bait" and what do I know, maybe it is. However it is viewed, you are absolutely right. Measurement is NOT the issue in determining whether or not the law has been violated.. JMO

 

[Deleted member 39678]

You are right, Ranch. But I sort of doubt that men with wee ones advertise them. To me it's laughable that anyone would want to advertise at all, but that's just me. Men who do advertise seem to think that it is "bait" and what do I know, maybe it is. However it is viewed, you are absolutely right. Measurement is NOT the issue in determining whether or not the law has been violated.. JMO

I have no idea what men with "wee ones" do. I'll be blunt. We don't know what size JRH is so why is size even brought up? JMO.

 

[CHERIE.T]

I don't think the comment about jh possibly taking his son to lunch was odd.
I do however think it was said to not upset mom about her son not being there.

 

[MissJ]

You are right, Ranch. But I sort of doubt that men with wee ones advertise them. To me it's laughable that anyone would want to advertise at all, but that's just me. Men who do advertise seem to think that it is "bait" and what do I know, maybe it is. However it is viewed, you are absolutely right. Measurement is NOT the issue in determining whether or not the law has been violated.. JMO

Yes and I'm fascinated why anyone would think "size" matters. But apparently RH did. Or thought "his" would be a turn on. One is the same as another. LOL. JMO

 

[CHERIE.T]

I have no idea what men with "wee ones" do. I'll be blunt. We don't know what size JRH is so why is size even brought up? JMO.

Because-from what I hear-- and to be blunt--
men with little weewee's aren't the one's sexting.