JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,623
- Reaction score
- 31,395
The cross examination of the investigating officer, Captain Kanna Swanepoel, began on Wednesday.
Swanepoel was called to testify in the trial within a trial to determine the admissibility of the recording of Panayiotou and his bouncer, Luthando Siyoni, the alleged middleman turned state witness shortly after Jayde’s murder.
CP’s defence council have argued that Siyoni was tortured into making his confession and, as such, all further evidence should be inadmissible as “fruit of the poisonous tree”.
Swanepoel returned to the stand, where he was cross examined by CP’s defence council, Advocate Terry Price. Price didn't hold anything back while interrogating Swanepoel on various aspects of his earlier testimony. He repeatedly asked Swanepoel about Siyoni’s legal representation and questioned if he had not tried to convince Siyoni to get different legal counsel. Price said he had witnesses who would testify regarding this.
Swanepoel, who continuously made notes while on the stand, said Siyoni had not been able to afford an attorney and legal aid had been approached to provide representation, which led to the appointment of attorney Van der Spuy.
Swanepoel said Siyoni didn't have money for a blanket or radio and that his parents didn't have money to take a taxi from Kwazakhele to the police station. “We had to send someone to fetch them”.
Foul language
Price questioned Swanepoel on the reasoning behind Siyoni being placed in protective custody at the Humewood Police Station’s holding cells.
He said Siyoni had been given the impression that he feared his life was in danger after unidentified men visited his home. He said there had been heightened concern over witnesses being gunned down at the time and a task team had been established to investigate.
Price rebutted by instructing Swanepoel not to generalise and to remain within the confines of the case and that no witnesses had been gunned down in this case.
Price also raised concerns that Siyoni had complained that Van der Spuy had never visited him, but Swanepoel said Van der Spuy had consulted with Siyoni. “My understanding of never means not once. And Van der Spuy visited him on at least two occasions in my presence” said Swanepoel.
Price then confronted Swanepoel about foul language that was allegedly used by state advocate Marius Stander during interviews with CP’s mistress, Chanelle Coutts. He asked Swanepoel if he could recall Stander asking Coutts why she was with CP, asking her if it was because he had a “groot piel” (big penis) or if it was because he was a “lekker naai” (good in bed).
Swanepoel said he could not recall that being said.
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/N...captain-in-panayiotou-case-continues-20170426
Swanepoel was called to testify in the trial within a trial to determine the admissibility of the recording of Panayiotou and his bouncer, Luthando Siyoni, the alleged middleman turned state witness shortly after Jayde’s murder.
CP’s defence council have argued that Siyoni was tortured into making his confession and, as such, all further evidence should be inadmissible as “fruit of the poisonous tree”.
Swanepoel returned to the stand, where he was cross examined by CP’s defence council, Advocate Terry Price. Price didn't hold anything back while interrogating Swanepoel on various aspects of his earlier testimony. He repeatedly asked Swanepoel about Siyoni’s legal representation and questioned if he had not tried to convince Siyoni to get different legal counsel. Price said he had witnesses who would testify regarding this.
Swanepoel, who continuously made notes while on the stand, said Siyoni had not been able to afford an attorney and legal aid had been approached to provide representation, which led to the appointment of attorney Van der Spuy.
Swanepoel said Siyoni didn't have money for a blanket or radio and that his parents didn't have money to take a taxi from Kwazakhele to the police station. “We had to send someone to fetch them”.
Foul language
Price questioned Swanepoel on the reasoning behind Siyoni being placed in protective custody at the Humewood Police Station’s holding cells.
He said Siyoni had been given the impression that he feared his life was in danger after unidentified men visited his home. He said there had been heightened concern over witnesses being gunned down at the time and a task team had been established to investigate.
Price rebutted by instructing Swanepoel not to generalise and to remain within the confines of the case and that no witnesses had been gunned down in this case.
Price also raised concerns that Siyoni had complained that Van der Spuy had never visited him, but Swanepoel said Van der Spuy had consulted with Siyoni. “My understanding of never means not once. And Van der Spuy visited him on at least two occasions in my presence” said Swanepoel.
Price then confronted Swanepoel about foul language that was allegedly used by state advocate Marius Stander during interviews with CP’s mistress, Chanelle Coutts. He asked Swanepoel if he could recall Stander asking Coutts why she was with CP, asking her if it was because he had a “groot piel” (big penis) or if it was because he was a “lekker naai” (good in bed).
Swanepoel said he could not recall that being said.
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/N...captain-in-panayiotou-case-continues-20170426