Dropping 1600 feet down a mountain would result in good speed by the time it landed near or in the water. I posted the link to school physics - the formula is there somewhere.
Dropping ....or jumping.
Dropping 1600 feet down a mountain would result in good speed by the time it landed near or in the water. I posted the link to school physics - the formula is there somewhere.
Dropping 1600 feet down a mountain would result in good speed by the time it landed near or in the water. I posted the link to school physics - the formula is there somewhere.
Great find Muva! And very interesting indeed. It may confirm some of our theories about ED's state of mind... ED's relationship with DC... and her lack of food...
And... could LA (the person named in the story) be the mystery bespectacled person in a pic on the Esther and Dan FB page from 13/11 that I called out in my Thread #2, page 34, post #678?.... I was hoping she'd be identified and found, to help shed light on ED's state of being and whatever other information that person may have.
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=0024ea40070d69c16f0603c8a68acc60&oe=60169BD9
Anyone know what it would mean that the British police have now gotten involved with this case?
On the subject of not making sense....
We haven't heard of anyone coming forward who met ED and DC during their long hike over the summer. It's EXTREMELY unlikely no one remembered them. Hikers remember who they had lunch with on the mountainside, who they had that long philosophical conversation with at a hostel or Refuge.... It's a friendly set, hikers are tired and get relaxed, they have time to sit around, they share exploits, discuss gear, warn of trail difficulties ahead, share food, talk about the weather and places to camp, talk about food, talk about food, talk about food....
Yet no one seems to have come forward who encountered them on that long trek. Why?
Involvement of police should only happen when there is some possibility of wrongful action by a third party. French police have ruled out third party and favour accident, but include voluntary disappearance.
Perhaps her family has requested an investigation. Perhaps there are details and questions that are unanswered. What was her partner doing for the month that she was hiking solo ... beyond house sitting (typically paid to ensure the property is occupied).
On the subject of not making sense....
We haven't heard of anyone coming forward who met ED and DC during their long hike over the summer. It's EXTREMELY unlikely no one remembered them. Hikers remember who they had lunch with on the mountainside, who they had that long philosophical conversation with at a hostel or Refuge.... It's a friendly set, hikers are tired and get relaxed, they have time to sit around, they share exploits, discuss gear, warn of trail difficulties ahead, share food, talk about the weather and places to camp, talk about food, talk about food, talk about food....
Yet no one seems to have come forward who encountered them on that long trek. Why?
I'm not sure why they would as I can't really see what it has to do with her disappearance on this last trip.
True. Like you said in a previous post, if they have come forward it might not have been made public.For background detail.
Good point. I was basing elevation on the meters indicated on the caption of the photo in the dossier. The cable has to be on the switch backs. The lake elevation is 225o, switchbacks appear to be 2400-2450 m elevation. That's a difference of 200 meters, roughly 700 feet. She would be falling slower when she landed from that height.
View attachment 279731
Topology map: Le Port de Venasque
Lake elevation: Boums de Venasque - Bagnères de Luchon
Thank you for posting this. It actually fits-in with the direction the discussion was going regarding possibilities such as voluntarily missing (suicide?), accident and criminal event.
This is definitely a reference to asking strangers for food. It brings back something else we discussed - why she was quibbling over small change regarding the chia seeds that were, or were not, on sale. Was she short on money?
"Hiker Laura Adomaitye met Esther, 37, at a shelter days earlier and was surprised at how little food she carried."To her emotional state:
"“When you are not 100 per cent OK with your partner, you’re not going to be totally balanced emotionally.”Missing hiker 'had problems in her love life' Brit cops hear as they join search
The cables are on the way to the Pic Sauvegarde see- Randonnée Pic Sauvegarde 2738m – Les Topos Pyrénées par Mariano
The part that stood out most to me was where Laura said;
“I told them what she said to me about their relationship.
Esther said she and Dan were taking a break and she didn’t know if they were going to get back together."
But Dan also stayed at the Refuge for two days—and perhaps some other occasional hikers had entered—as well as SAR. All of that would have contaminated the aroma, especially that many days after ED was scheduled to be there.
I don't think she hiked to the refuge and continued on the trail to the Port de Glere via Lac de la Montagnette at 4:30-5:00 PM on Mon Nov 22. If she had made it to the refuge Winter room on Nov 22, she would most likely have settled in for the night.
I think there's something to the fact that she hiked the Pic de Sauvegarde on Nov 21, sent photos, descended a short distance down the trail, stayed at a cabin in Spain, then hiked back up the same summit the following day at 3 PM - remarkably late in the day - arriving at the summit around 4 PM. Was she scoping out options and trails towards Port de Glere?
There would be nothing on a rock face to indicate that someone fell. The rocks are millions of years old - no way to tell from a helicopter when a scratch on the rocks happened.
She was probably sturdy enough that she didn't fall over when wearing a backpack in the wind and she most likely had a safe yet accessible place to pack/carry the phone when she was hiking.
It's a 1600 foot fall, there is a cable system in the switch backs because the slope is steep - slipperiness is a factor (temp, shade, precipitation)
Yes, Otto. I have wondered that myself in my prior musings here - whether ED truly intended to go to the Refuge de Vanesque on 22/11. Or if she simply descended back down to her van or the Cabane she stayed at 21/11 at the trail head of Pic de S... Or hiked towards Port de Glere - via the trail next to the Refuge de Vanesque - to possibly bivouac on the edge of Lac de Montagnette (see image below). Or did she bivouac at the summit of Pic de Sauvegarde on 22/11? Or just walk into a deep lake to end it all.
Anyhow, back to the idea that dear ED is at the bottom of a lake. I went back to topo maps and some web pics from the summit of Pic de Sauvegarde. Given the trajectory if ED fell from the back side of the col, would / could she have landed near the middle of the Boum de Vanesque? But without a trace of anything on the rock face?
On the topo map, I drew in two red lines - the left line would be the fall from the summit, the right line would be the fall from that steep descent from Port de Vanesque you talked about. And I have a picture of Boum Lake from the backside of the Pic de S summit. We've seen images like this before, but have we explored a fall from here?
Going back to RickshawFan's assessment that with ED's slim stature, her heavy pack, and the design of the pack, it could possibly topple her backwards in an accident. Or if she tried to retrieve a dropped phone... Or many other scenarios that might have put her in a precarious situation she could not recover from...
Sources:
Image #1: Sauvegarde / Salvaguardia
Image #2: Lakes "Boum du Port" : Photos, Diagrams & Topos : SummitPost
The part that stood out most to me was where Laura said;
“I told them what she said to me about their relationship.
Esther said she and Dan were taking a break and she didn’t know if they were going to get back together."