- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,923
- Reaction score
- 126,896
As I understand that quote, it simply means they didn’t see the remains likely ‘cos they were under snow. It doesn’t mean the ground was bare a few weeks ago, and the bones weren’t there. He adds that they were also likely moved.
It is a bit ambiguous. On the one hand, the translation states that the bones are at an altitude covered by snow through the Winter. On the other hand, he says that according to the investigation the bones were not there a couple of weeks ago. The snow would have been gone in early July and the bones were not visible.
For some reason, he concludes that the body was obscured until recently.
I was thinking about the fact that the body is skeletonized even though it was most likely frozen for months. It's surprising. I'm leaning towards wolves, lynx, bears, or, more likely, vultures having cleaned the body in the last couple of weeks. The bones must be somewhat scattered to conclude animal activity.
I suppose we'll know when the area is searched for backpack and other personal items. I'm very curious whether those items are between the body and the Port de la Glere.