Maddy they do have a case..the case is what happened to the mysteriously missing Stacy Peterson. The word case to me means investigation to see what happened..it does not mean charges to me. Charges on when you have finished your casework and have the facts and evidence you need to place charges and go to court. A case is simply something has happened and now we give it a file name and number and then you investigate. Charges come later. I was a case- worker..I did not always file charges or take action..but I did have cases and work to do with those to sort out what happened. This is a case of a missing person who can not be found. I won't argue about this any more.
You seem to think of case as a verb ..Making a case for something..I use it as a noun , this case involves Stacy Peterson's dissappearance.
Right. So, let's agree on a compromise, which is this:
an INVESTIGATIVE CASE.
Whew. Okay, we're all good and we agree.
(Right?)
But -- you know ... really, truly ... that my posts are seemingly 'angry' towards those who feel they're somehow entitled to convicting someone without real hard evidence. (Am I really 'angry'? um.... yes and no.) I am moreso ... SO
disappointed, because I know that all of us value fairness. I think that you cannot deem yourself as being fair while convicting someone else without evidence. It doesn't make sense. And, as Judge Judy says: If it doesn't make sense, it's not true!) And please don't tell me you hate Judge Judy because she rules based on facts instead of her feelings -- because you'll only prove my point.
I do not like that this is done on Websleuths.
I'm only interested and put credibility in
facts.
AND, I *love* it that people are stating their opinions.
I just wish that they'd do it without having to include ad hominem attacks on the alleged perpetator's person -- and without malice ... because it's unfair. (NOTE: The FACTS aren't in yet! You may be surprised at the end of this. Is it likely? Nah. But, there IS that chance!)
I find it to be amazing that people who have BEEN victims are so willing to hang someone without hard evidence.
Doing that negates having BEEN a victim, IMO. It means that these people invite mayhem into their lives because they EXPECT it -- and, if you always do what you've always done, you will always get what you've always gotten. (It's not just a catch-phrase, to me. It seems to be a valid conclusion.)
I think everyone needs to stop giving credit to this average suburban cop guy, as if he is somehow SO FRACKING SMART that he planned out every last detail to murder his wife. I think, by doing this, you are giving over YOUR POWER to him and -- more importantly, you are admitting YOU HAVE NONE. (Don't hate JUST yet - just think about what I just typed. Seriously. He doesn't deserve this much thought process. He's NOT that sharp at the end of the day!)
I think it's VERY obvious that he's not capable of any such feats of devious 'greatness'.
Everyone, please -- stop assigning this man the same BRILLIANCE that YOU possess! He doesn't have a clue!
:crazy:
