State rests rebuttal case - thread #168

Status
Not open for further replies.
He met ALV @ international conference = one of the people the committee asked to speak - she is involved in a partnership representing another organization. She co-chaired battered intervention coalition in Calif and he chaired research committee for that organizations.....6 or 7 years ago national policies on offenders - later came out as a book - he was co-editor of that book and ALV wrote a chapter.

they have referred cases to each other .. . . he lives in San Diego and she is in long beach area about 1.5 hrs away - they don't usually work together but have been @ conferences @ same time.

he never discussed JW subject of ALV, talked a little about Demarte's testimony and is a little aware of Dr. Samuels work - he hasn't seen their testimony in court.

superior courts or apellate courts have commented on his work . . .
didn't know that at the time . . . he is virtually unaware of cases that get appealed - he is not involved in those - he might have heard someone was apealing one.

at some point down road appellate courts have an opinion about his testimony in other cases. .. .4 or 5 times going back 25 years - details he couldn't remember -ld they woule read what apellate court said . . . deemed not relevant to what he was doing then . . subsequently someone went back and traced those cases . . another atty did check those.

they are currently using Superior court - the opinions of other judges - appellate courts above them some of the cases were 5 or 10 years later and he was no longer working on that case or knew anything about them @ the time.

he has not been acused of being unethical or needed discipline. . . . no point he was not allowed to testify - in most cases his credentials were . . .
he was allowed to testify but not a specific things . . had to do with a legal matter not your qualifications?
objection - sustained

legal aspect not one of your expertise - that what he was told by other Atty's - not about his expertise that part was not challenged.

diplomate in neuropsychology - he trained Master level students . . .

whole part of operation doing neuro-psych evals for hospital . . if someone was suspected to have a learning disablity, injury to brain, stroke and they did outpatient rehab. they still train people in neuropsych evals.

peer review/publish . . . any publications in neuro-psych . . . some were learning disablity in school children, neuropsychological assessment, and research we conducted on quantitative EEG's =

domestic violence offenders to people with head injuries to people who have none of those . . . putting together data base for neuro-psych evals of capital offenders in 8 states.

objection
approach

Dear Wen,
I am forever grateful for all that you do, and always thank your post. Do you have your own thread for these? Or have I missed another part of websleuths altogether?
 
"Whaaa..whaa..whaaa..wha..whaaa...whaa..whaaaaaa..." Spoken in Charlie Brown Teacher Speak...UGH!!!!!!!! Someone make it stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This Judge should be DISCIPLINED for her shoddy oversight in this trial! This is a TRAVESTY her allowing this GARBAGE into this case at this late stage of the trial. She is the Judge, she should know what is grounds for appeal and whether there is even remotely a chance certain things may or may cause appeal grounds. This is just nuts her not having control over this court. It's a shame for Travis's family that they have to be put through another day of this bag full of lies and untruths from a make believe defense.
 
tumblr_mkivr3S8gm1r972ibo1_400.gif
 
I'll be around as long as people continue to commit crime :)

.....whenever I see sassy cat, aka Miss Thang, that black eyed peas songs plays in my mind..." My humps. my humps, my lovely lady humps..." or wahtever the "ump" word is....:floorlaugh:
 
For the love of God........please stop. I'd rather stick needles in my eyes than listen to this for the rest of the day.
 
He spills water everywhere, he burps,he can't point out lobes of the brain, doesn't know which side is which, then I swear he burps again.

This is like a Sat. Night Live sketch, I swear.
 
WEEBLES!
Thank you for providing a much needed service.

We Wuv you.
 
OOOOOHHHH, this is leading into Travis's being shot in the head, not Jodi's head?
 
Just dropped in for a moment:

Did this guy just say he is "generally" familiar with physiology of the brain, but he may have forgotten some things? WTF?
 
More dirty looks for...the jury? The gallery?

sg4_zps0d953a3a.jpg


sg5_zps26759e1e.jpg
 
Speech is in the big wobbly bit behind the bone there .. you know the floppy inside part under the bone right?
 
So the judge limited testimony until 5pm today. Will Juan get a fair shot??
 
:banghead: banghead: :banghead:

What DOES this have to do with anything?????? Why is this allowed t drone on and on and on when it has no bearing on the matter at hand?
 
Wait did I not understand this??

By Jodi's expert own admission Travis would not have been able to speak after being injured by the gunshot???? So what happened to Travis shouting Kill you f'in b!tch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
211
Guests online
581
Total visitors
792

Forum statistics

Threads
625,828
Messages
18,511,222
Members
240,852
Latest member
owlmama
Back
Top