State rests rebuttal case - thread #169

[Gypsy Road]

It drives me crazy the way JW always has to pat herself on the back every time she gets an answer she likes.

I know, right? She even verbalizes it by saying "Ok. Great!" :banghead:

 

[Hope4More]

Ok, forget sending out for pizza. The way JW keeps digging, everyone should be getting Chinese food in a few more minutes. :lol:

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[HarvestMoon]

Hair: I think it's getting oily, just an observation.

 

[ElleElle]

JW is huffing and puffing. :floorlaugh:

 

[MagicRose99]

OMG an end in sight... go Juan!

 

[Bernina]

Gopher..........roflmao!!!!!!

 

[banzai]

JW breaking a sweat - her fluffy hair has gone flat lol - digging her client deeper into her void.

 

[kaydono]

She is trying, and failing each time.

 

[carole]

A gopher!!

 

[JRS_JD2L]

The tiger and bear hypo is BS. There is a HUGE difference between possibly being confused in what you are attacked BY, and being THE ATTACKER. Pretty easy.

 

[elementary]

So. Here's my take on the tiger/bear controversy. It took me awhile to sort it out, but now I get it. I think. If you got attacked by a bear, the sight of a tiger would not trigger PTSD. So that's why they ARE different in terms of the triggering traumatic event. Does that make sense?

By George, you've got it! Kudos!

 

[Veritas_Vita]

Wild About Trial@WildAboutTrial

Jurors, as is everyone else, are looking exhausted. Willmott's handbag must be choc full o' 5 hour energies. #JodiArias
Reply
Retweet

 

[Curious Me]

Hang on, here comes Juan to wake us up.

A GOPHER NOW!

 

[HarvestMoon]

"redirect" wow did the Judge sound tired,

LMAO a "gopher:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[rose222]

Now I realize why JM got her in at the end. She is amazing. Standing ovation for this credible witness with the charming accent...:blushing:

 

[Mrs G Norris]

Straight back to the lion .. I mean gopher!!!! Love you Juan.

 

[luvtenniss]

Dr. Horn is supposed to read the transcribed report, check for accuracy and then sign it. IMO, he was sloppy.

Yes, he made a mistake. Well, one prosecution witness with a mistake. Let's count the defense's mistakes - intentional and unintentional...1, 2, 3...nevermind, I am way too tired for that.

 

[wasnt_me]

Let's concentrate on the lying. I like that much better than tigers and bears.

But then we'd be looking at the iceberg and not the chairs! :floorlaugh:

 

[MidwestMama]

BWHAHAHA!
Now gophers are thrown into the mix!
LOL

 

[ChinaBlue]

With all due respect to psychologists - and your education and training and hands-on experience - psychology is not an exact science. Mathematics is - 2+2=4 will always be true no matter what expert witness you bring to court; psychology deals with probabilities, perhaps,and maybes. Do not be fooled by any of this testimony. The only definite, and measurable, proof in this case is 20-some stab wounds, a neck slit ear-to-ear and a gunshot wound. What else do you have to focus on?