State v Bradley Cooper 04/01/11

Status
Not open for further replies.
**Help Please*** About the 'ignore' list. Yesterday I tried to find out by reading the help boards how to place someone on ignore but couldn't find the info. Would you please fill me in? Thank you!

From the FAQ

Can I block posts, emails and messages from specific users?

If there are particular members that bother you and you do not want to see their posts or receive Private Messages and Emails from them, then you can add these members to your 'Ignore List'. There are several ways to do this:

Through your User Control Panel: User CP, Settings & Options, Edit Ignore List. Then, type their name into the empty text box and click 'Okay'.
 
*****kind of off topic*****I just want to say how ashamed I am of myself. I'm out running errands right now, sitting in the parking lot at HT, thinking.... back into my reality, and cannot believe some of the things I have said about the victim in this trial. These are things that don't have anything go do with what happened or who did what. The only thing I have to say for myself is that one of my faults is that I'm too quick to openly criticize when I'm irritated. I speak before I think. I blurt things out and go on a rant, without taking into account the feelings of others. I need to try and express my thoughts and ideas more eloquently and with a little more compassion when dealing with others feelings and opinions.

I can't say I'll be well behaved all the time now but I certainly am aware of my actions and am going to keep reminding myself that these are real people involved here and not actors and actresses. I have no problem with anybody else; It's only my actions I'm concerned with and disappointed with.

FYI....The only reason I came here to begin with was because of the outcome of the Ray Cook trial and my disappointment with it. My boys very frequently drive through the intersection where Cook crashed into the young lady killing her. I can't imagine the heartbreak if it had been my child.

Anyway, I was so let down with the final result and subsequent sentenceing in his trial that I decided to start paying more attention to our justice system and what goes on, who does what, so that maybe instead of complaining about certain actions I could cast a vote in the future and try to support someone that may help certain changes to be made.

Of course, after being here now, I have become intrigued with this trial and still am.

I hope that concrete evidence that no one can question is presented one way or the other so it will be easy for jurors to know what to do in the end.

Okay, so moving on, I'm going to try and be less condemning of people involved in the future.

Pam

I'm not sure what all you said, but don't feel bad. It isn't about blaming the victim, it's about trying to look through all of this stuff and understand the real picture of what was going on with this couple. I think a lot will be clearer when we get to hear from the defense witnesses. Everyone here agrees that this was a horrible thing that happened to this poor woman.

Nobody here is blaming the victim.
 
Until enough evidence is presented that 100% proves he did it. How was it not a rush to judgement to point at the guy and say he was guilty on day one, if for nothing else because a) he's the spouse and b) he didn't look right? Do you think if by some miracle they find something down the road that proves his innocence that all those people are going to say 'I'm sorry, I thought you killed her"? I don't think so

So that's what you think happened? CPD just picked him up because he was the spouse and he didn't look right?
 
From the FAQ

Can I block posts, emails and messages from specific users?

If there are particular members that bother you and you do not want to see their posts or receive Private Messages and Emails from them, then you can add these members to your 'Ignore List'. There are several ways to do this:

Through your User Control Panel: User CP, Settings & Options, Edit Ignore List. Then, type their name into the empty text box and click 'Okay'.

I totally missed this yesterday. Thank you so much!
 
Update me, please!

I didn't get to watch much today, but am I correct that HP contacted Interact on behalf of Nancy? Or did Nancy do it at HP's behest?

If so, I may have turned a corner today with regard to the "Lochmere busy-bodies" or HP, at least. Did the say why there was no help for Nancy? I get the feeling Nancy told everyone about her situation as a kind of cry for help. Maybe hoping that something might come of it...I don't know...speculating. Misery loves company and all that.

While we're on the subject of the prosecution "friend" witnesses, it's my opinion that they should have put up JA and HP and stopped there. All of these neighbors just leave me with a bad taste in my mouth. Totally MOO.

I'm still very worried for this prosecution. Still no direct evidence and nothing overly compelling otherwise. I agree that all "signs" point to Brad (basing that solely on what I consider to be odd behaviors and activities presented so far) but as the weeks go on I'm getting more anxious/convinced that he will walk.

Lastly, it really upsets me that there are couple and families that live this way. So very, very sad.
 
Update me, please!

I didn't get to watch much today, but am I correct that HP contacted Interact on behalf of Nancy? Or did Nancy do it at HP's behest?

If so, I may have turned a corner today with regard to the "Lochmere busy-bodies" or HP, at least. Did the say why there was no help for Nancy? I get the feeling Nancy told everyone about her situation as a kind of cry for help. Maybe hoping that something might come of it...I don't know...speculating. Misery loves company and all that.

While we're on the subject of the prosecution "friend" witnesses, it's my opinion that they should have put up JA and HP and stopped there. All of these neighbors just leave me with a bad taste in my mouth. Totally MOO.

I'm still very worried for this prosecution. Still no direct evidence and nothing overly compelling otherwise. I agree that all "signs" point to Brad (basing that solely on what I consider to be odd behaviors and activities presented so far) but as the weeks go on I'm getting more anxious/convinced that he will walk.

Lastly, it really upsets me that there are couple and families that live this way. So very, very sad.

Hannah introduced Nancy to a friend, Susan Crook. Susan is the one who actually contacted Interact. She testified today.
 
Susan Crook called InterAct based on information she received from HP. Nancy did not contact InterAct when Susan suggested to Hannah that Hannah tell Nancy to contact InterAct so Susan made the call. At this point we have no evidence showing whether Nancy contacted InterAct or not but based upon what we do have it appears that she did not.
 
And who is this Susan? Is she affiliated with Interact in some way? Or just another friend?
 
There is zero evidence that NC was a victim of domestic violence. That is probably the reason she never followed through and called them.

I will admit that there is zero evidence that she was a victim of physical domestic violence. (Yet) I can't say the same for emotional and/or psychological domestic violence.
 
From the affidavit point 14. "... I finally spoke with someone." indicating a call to CPD. "To date, no one has paid a visit..."

OK, so, she told her story to CPD 3 times, and someone spoke with her. What else would be required to satisfy her that they knew what she had to offer?

#18 Brad Cooper's investigator was the first person to ask me detailed questions about how and when I saw Nancy.
 
There is zero evidence that NC was a victim of domestic violence. That is probably the reason she never followed through and called them.

I have to agree with you here. None of her complaints to her friends seem to include Brad physically abusing here. I think if Nancy had mentioned something he'd done in particular, Hannah or Susan would had testified to it.
 
#18 Brad Cooper's investigator was the first person to ask me detailed questions about how and when I saw Nancy.

I'm actually looking forward to seeing this person on the stand. I'm assuming the defense will call her. I would like to hear how she was able to identify the person as NC.
 
I'm honesty surprised more people here don't have a problem with this.

I would guess it has to do with her statement she gave in the phone interview. Example: If she said something like, "Yes, she's about my height. I know because we were eye level. I'm 5'2"." That might give them reason to feel that the person she saw was not Nancy. I'm in a location where people walk, run, ride past my house all the time. There are a few regulars that I recognize and if something happened I would be able to say for sure if I had seen them walk past my house if I was out. Others that I'm not familiar with, I would not be able to identify even with a picture. I'm very curious as to what specifically allowed her to be so certain that a stranger that passed by her was the woman she saw on a flyer.
 
They have a sworn witness who says she say and spoke with NC while jogging at 7:10 am that morning... I posted lnk and everyone just glosses past it. That alone should at least keep people objective.

I don't put much stock in a witness who does not KNOW the victim. She saw and said one word, "hello," to a woman jogging with a light colored shirt on. She is certain in her mind the woman looked just like the picture she saw on a flyer of Nancy. Lots of people look like lots of other people. "She had a long face" - I have a long face. I'm nearly 5'10". In a pony tail and ball cap and out jogging, I'd even look like NC's picture on a flyer. Eye witnesses can certainly be wrong. Many of those innocent people sitting in prison all those years who were convicted on eye witness testimony alone - even something as close up and personal as a rape where the victim had to spend several minutes and longer directly face to face with a man have picked a man out of a line up, pointed at him court and said, yes, that's him - all to find out later that DNA did not match the accused. So, no, I don't believe the woman truly saw nancy - she might truly believe in her mind she did, but she did not KNOW nancy, therefore, could be mistaken.
 
I'm not sure what all you said, but don't feel bad. It isn't about blaming the victim, it's about trying to look through all of this stuff and understand the real picture of what was going on with this couple. I think a lot will be clearer when we get to hear from the defense witnesses. Everyone here agrees that this was a horrible thing that happened to this poor woman.

Nobody here is blaming the victim.

Really?? :waitasec:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
407
Total visitors
536

Forum statistics

Threads
626,902
Messages
18,535,203
Members
241,150
Latest member
Phantom_Chops
Back
Top