jmflu
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 1,404
- Reaction score
- 0
The search was on the 13th. No way he did that trying to make it look like it was Nancy. Was he going to suggest she snuck into the house to do it?
There goes that theory...
The search was on the 13th. No way he did that trying to make it look like it was Nancy. Was he going to suggest she snuck into the house to do it?
The search was on the 13th. No way he did that trying to make it look like it was Nancy. Was he going to suggest she snuck into the house to do it?
Yet he did neither.
The search was on the 13th. No way he did that trying to make it look like it was Nancy. Was he going to suggest she snuck into the house to do it?
Yes, and didn't he also include in those searches "things to do with the kids" even though he had plans for tennis. It is likely that his story was, she wasn't home yet, he took the kids out, and came back and lo and behold, she had searched flights and jobs and everything else. Add this to the contact with her ex- fiance in Canada, and we have a woman running away.....He didn't know she had plans in the morning, or why would she let him make tennis plans?
He had tennis at 9:30. He would have been home by noon at the latest.
I personally think they should call his entire MBA class and everyone who has ever competed in an Ironman with him. Just to get everyone's opinion in.
All the folks who were invited to their wedding should come to verify there was indeed a wedding. Heck, let's bring in Building #9 at Cisco, too.
But the dress NC wore to the party was in the house. So was the necklace, her cell phone, keys.
Let's have a "pool" to see how many days the defense will take to present their case. What is everyone's guess?![]()
But he could have been asleep? he couldn't even find the rifht dress, her cell was in the car, who is ti say he ever even knew if she came home? She could have left the party with someone.
During the deposition BC's attorney objected many many times in the depo...and the next words out the attorney's mouth was that he could answer the question. They could have saved him at that deposition so many times and they did not do that.
I am thinking Kurtzie will pull some 'directed verdict' nonsense. Can we pull that side first?
I'll go with seven days on defense (it's Easter weekend, so three days this week and ending next Friday?
Allowing Brad to be co-counsel is one of the biggest mistakes they are making. He's not in a position to see things clearly. MOO
I was thinking six, with closing next Friday, but I'm a rookie. Never followed a trial before. EVER. How long do you think the close will take?
He isn't co-counsel. Where do you get that from?
I keep going back to the M.E. testimony. That onion segment still in her stomach. Defense didn't counteract that factoid. An entire meal would be digested within 6 hrs. Every bit of food gone. Even an onion, which takes longer to digest, would be gone by then.
If you assume Nancy took her last bite of food at midnight, right before she left the party, all food in her stomach would be gone, out of her stomach, within 6 hrs.
Onion piece still in stomach at autopsy. Not contested.
Nancy was dead by 6am.
Found this info on a GI site, a study:
50% of stomach contents emptied 2.5 to 3 hours Total emptying of the stomach 4 to 5 hours
He isn't co-counsel. Where do you get that from?