State v Bradley Cooper 04-19-2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #441
Kurtz wanted to give this guy knowledge of the FBI tools? Mr. boot-leg?
 
  • #442
I be the judge won't rule until after lunch.

Poo poo on what I think.
 
  • #443
Can he still be allowed to testify but not as an expert or will he be out as a witness if the judge disallows him being tendered as an expert witness?

Not sure Cheyenne..But doubt he will be given the hat of expert...and his cross exam on his experience could very well sink his credibility in the jury's eyes. IMO
 
  • #444
Oh crap!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't allow him.
 
  • #445
Will allow the witness but NOT to what Kurtz wanted.
 
  • #446
Witness is in as networking expert. Not forensic examiner.

Kelly
 
  • #447
Gessner's ruling is what I expected. Now I predict Boz objecting to many questions, saying that they are outside Ward's field of expertise.
 
  • #448
Kurtz needs clarification.
 
  • #449
  • #450
Well, there ya go. That pretty much renders Ward useless.
 
  • #451
Not qualified to interpet FBI data
 
  • #452
Gessner's ruling is what I expected. Now I predict Boz objecting to many questions, saying that they are outside Ward's field of expertise.

This pretty much blows the defense out of the water. They have no one to back up the claim of tampering, which is the only way out of the smoking gun testimony.
 
  • #453
Not sure Cheyenne..But doubt he will be given the hat of expert...and his cross exam on his experience could very well sink his credibility in the jury's eyes. IMO

Thank you. I think the judge just answered for me. He can testify as to the security risks of the network but not forensic examination or the forensic analysis of the FBI data.
 
  • #454
The Judge is splitting the baby here..expert only on security and penetration but NOT as forensic expert so therefore cannot interpret FBI's findings...Rhut Rho...Kurtz will NOT BE HAPPY:truce:

ETA~~ When are they due back..too busy typing and didnt hear that?
 
  • #455
Denied
 
  • #456
Kurtz is going to cry in his lunch. LOL! He is pizzed off. He might as well just say I don't want the witness now Your Honor.
 
  • #457
Did you lose your feed? I couldn't hear what Kurtz was saying there at the end 'your honor, we are going to need........'
 
  • #458
This pretty much blows the defense out of the water. They have no one to back up the claim of tampering, which is the only way out of the smoking gun testimony.

Not sure that I would go so far as to say they don't have something up their sleeves, but the Defense was dealt a serious blow today.

I will be very interested in what comes up next.

Kelly
 
  • #459
Kurtz looked dumbfounded
 
  • #460
the judge is splitting the baby here..expert only on security and penetration but not as forensic expert so therefore cannot interpret fbi's findings...rhut rho...kurtz will not be happy:truce:

Eta~~ when are they due back..too busy typing and didnt hear that?

12:45
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
2,272
Total visitors
2,352

Forum statistics

Threads
632,847
Messages
18,632,540
Members
243,312
Latest member
downtherabbithole003
Back
Top