State v Bradley Cooper 4-27-2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #421
Ok, like I think some of the things we say here are akin to "he wore green socks, but it was winter...he must have been thinking of spring...therefore, he ran off to the Bahamas! Not Siberia!"
 
  • #422
Really? They know the make and model of every telephone in your house?

The FXO port looks just like a telephone to the modem. There is no signaling to pass information through the telephony port. There is no mac address or serial number associated with the telephony port.

The the question I was responding to is below, I said nothing about them knowing the make and model of my specific handsets.

"Originally Posted by Albert
Your router is connected to an ethernet interface. A router with a voice module would be connected to the telephony line. Ask TWC if they have any clue what is connected to your telephony line."
 
  • #423
Oh good grief!! This guy is just a gossipy busybody!!

No kidding, same thing JP was bashed for yesterday. I put them on about parr with each other. Wouldn't trust either of 'em to dog sit for me. Now the 'sad guy' yesterday, I'd trust him with anything.
 
  • #424
How many times does he have to say, he talked on NC's phone?
 
  • #425
I missed what he said before this crap about the phone started. Same Sex Flings?????
 
  • #426
Well, so far the rumors keep getting confirmed. Looks like we do need the same-sex options in our "Cheat Sheet". DD?

Please explain what I just missed. I was on a business call...:maddening:
 
  • #427
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. :seeya: That wasn't my take on it at all. :) My interpretation was quite different, along with attempting to liken a one time drunken mistake to a long-term affair of the heart. Brad did say 'he loved HM'.

One time drunken mistake? Didn't we hear testimony about her other man just last week? The one from back in 2001? So that is at least 2.
 
  • #428
What is wrong with this guy?? He talked to Brad using Nancy's phone!! WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL?????
 
  • #429
I think you should correct your post. NC's children were NOT home that night, it has been testified to. Nancy was at the halloween party, brad was out of town yet again, and the children were staying with HM, before nancy discovered her best friend was cohabitating with her husband. The children were not home and saying otherwise borders on unnecessary victim bashing with untruths. MOO

I agree that he should correct his post, but I do wonder how when the BDI'er's post things as fact that are not in evidence and are just hypothoses it is not also unnecessary victim bashing?
 
  • #430
WS gets a mention :D
 
  • #431
WEBSLEUTHS!!! OMG!!!! He did post here!!!!
 
  • #432
Oh wow.....he posts here.
 
  • #433
There you go! It was him here.
 
  • #434
Another websleuths callout. Posted under name eyebelieve
 
  • #435
ADA asking witness if he posted on websleuths. yes. ibelieve or some such as user id
 
  • #436
No kidding, same thing JP was bashed for yesterday. I put them on about parr with each other. Wouldn't trust either of 'em to dog sit for me. Now the 'sad guy' yesterday, I'd trust him with anything.

The women in this neighborhood have taken a very public bashing over gossiping. I've managed to watch this today - it makes me smile, at least with regard to what counts as a gossiping busybody.
 
  • #437
deletion
 
  • #438
Ha! I knew he had posted here!!
 
  • #439
Here comes another Websleuths shout out!
 
  • #440
It's possible to overthink some of this stuff.

I do not believe I'm "over-thinking" anything. Do you feel your comment is adding anything constructive here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
1,014
Total visitors
1,155

Forum statistics

Threads
632,296
Messages
18,624,435
Members
243,077
Latest member
someoneidk
Back
Top