State v Bradley Cooper 4-27-2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
I don't pull up anything except 'no matches' with that.

mod must have closed it. against TOS to sleuth other members here
 
  • #502
He's been defending BC from the beginning. His posts are just as arrogant as he sounds in person. Really upset that poor Brad lost the girls....

There are plenty of people that disagree with him losing his children at that point in time. He hadn't been charged with anything when the custody ruling came out.
 
  • #503
Well, anyway, I go along with Ghostcrab and not yet fully aware of how it helped the pros. to bring up the posting. The guy didn't think BC was involved is what I got from that.
 
  • #504
I don't pull up anything except 'no matches' with that.

Click on the earlier link to his post. Click on his userid. Go to statistics. Then to "find all posts by this user".
 
  • #505
mod must have closed it. against TOS to sleuth other members here

If you do an advanced search for all posts by eye_believe they will come up.
 
  • #506
Aw, this is choking me up. Poor Mrs. Cooper.
 
  • #507
Here is one thing he wrote:

"I really am done here.
Don't confuse my future silence with any type of victory by those who discount the scientific nature of the topic thread (A U T O P S Y) and choose to speculate about the killer's motives and other non-autopsy distractions. "

Seems like his ego causes him to get angry whenever anyone dares question his stance. No wonder he was so uncomfortable on the stand.

Well obviously he had more background information than the people he was arguing with (for the most part). I think that kind of attitude went on for the friends on both sides (hence the you are in or out stuff from earlier).
 
  • #508
mod must have closed it. against TOS to sleuth other members here

Not sure how it is sleuthing when it was directly from a trial we are all watching.
 
  • #509
I'm still very puzzled how the state knew Eye_believe was MH.

I've heard of this sort of things happening before. As far as I could figure out, police were monitoring forum comments and zeroed in on a couple that had "too much information". The IP address was obtained, and traced back to a computer. That person was then identified.
 
  • #510
I don't pull up anything except 'no matches' with that.

Same here ... wondering if they were quickly purged, although there's not much point of that at this time.
 
  • #511
Probably the same way I did...googling Nancy Cooper. Do you honestly believe that none of Nancy's friends read this site and/or posted on this site?

ETA: He joined October 6th, 2008.
Just an FYI...but not 100% sure if it still applies...we're not supposed to talk about other posters. Heck...how does that TOS rule work now?
 
  • #512
I missed what happened with Mrs. Cooper.
 
  • #513
  • #514
It got quiet here for a minute. Everybody ran off to dig up his posts.
 
  • #515
Just an FYI...but not 100% sure if it still applies...we're not supposed to talk about other posters. Heck...how does that TOS rule work now?


I'm not sure how that rule would apply here since we are allowed to discuss the trial evidence, and websleuths, eye_believe, and the autopsy post are all now part of the trial record.
 
  • #516
I sure hope Tricia didn't have to be involved (and hope that's ok to say).
 
  • #517
Not sure how it is sleuthing when it was directly from a trial we are all watching.

good point, just don't want to see anyone get a time out. :blushing:
 
  • #518
I can't believe the defense atty. is having Bradley's mom get up and show pics to the jury. Probably told her that her performance on the stand and in front of the jury is the key to getting her baby boy a get out jail card. Pressure and DRAMA!
 
  • #519
Same here ... wondering if they were quickly purged, although there's not much point of that at this time.

Hey otto,
Check out the post from kar and ncsu above.
 
  • #520
I sure hope Tricia didn't have to be involved (and hope that's ok to say).

Police could get the IP from the forum, or from the host server.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
94
Guests online
1,801
Total visitors
1,895

Forum statistics

Threads
632,345
Messages
18,625,002
Members
243,098
Latest member
sbidbh
Back
Top