State vs. Jason Lynn Young 02-29-12

[gritguy]

It seems to me, that no matter what the reaction is, someone will criticize it in some way. Even though JY never attempted to cash out on his insurance, it's still considered a motive. Would you say "that's why you pay premium" and he should have tried to collect, and no one would have faulted him?

No doubt that's correct.

That's why I focus on only the truly suspicious, hinky, bizarre, nasty, lying behavior of JY, and those so directed on his behalf. :innocent: :blushing:

 

[Just the Fax]

It seems to me, that no matter what the reaction is, someone will criticize it in some way. Even though JY never attempted to cash out on his insurance, it's still considered a motive. Would you say "that's why you pay premium" and he should have tried to collect, and no one would have faulted him?

The reason he didn't call in a claim was he needed to file an official police report to list the 'stolen' items. That would require a statement to police.
That's the only answer.

 

[pjcitizen]

Meredith testified about Cassidy asking her to get a washcloth and band aids for her mom.

Which means IMO she couldn't get the wash cloth herself and was probably remembering how SOMEONE (JLY) helped her clean her feet.

 

[gritguy]

You have to purchase an individual policy covering jewelry and it can be quite high according to the value of the jewelry.

Did Jayson have this type of insurance.

We have it and it is a separate policy from our homeowners insurance. My husband also has a vast gun collection and is insured under another policy.

IMO

I always enjoy the words "vast" and "gun" and "collection" put together in sequence just as you have. Makes me feel a little more normal each time. :rocker:

 

[oceanblueeyes]

But insurance did pay for the repairs to his house. Mr. Nationwide was on the stand testifying to just that. I'm sure there was a claim of $27K or so. So why not include the items that were stolen? That doesn't make sense to me. Unless they weren't really stolen, afterall.

I dont think those items would be covered under a homeowner policy.

 

[Wolfpack]

The reason he didn't call in a claim was he needed to file an official police report to list the 'stolen' items. That would require a statement to police.
That's the only answer.

That sounds perfectly logical to me. And I might have made the same choice.

 

[Cammy]

Today, it was proven that the accident Jason saw really did happen when an email from Michelle to SS was read out loud in court.

Michelle asked Shelly to check on the patient, as "Jase " was really worried and upset.

Then in his email to Gen, Jason also mentioned the accident he came upon.

That makes 2 x.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I always enjoy the words "vast" and "gun" and "collection" put together in sequence just as you have. Makes me feel a little more normal each time. :rocker:

:floorlaugh: He has guns that have been passed down to him by his grandfather and his father and of course he has bought his own too over the years. I have even bought him some too as gifts and one time I won him a 243.

My hubby is a big hunter.

IMO

 

[gritguy]

The reason he didn't call in a claim was he needed to file an official police report to list the 'stolen' items. That would require a statement to police.
That's the only answer.

This idea was forming in my head as well. The damage to the house was obvious. I wonder if you could collect for those other things without the police report or even answering to insurance agents. But, for all I know, they felt like those items weren't covered (can't remember if that was addressed in testimony).

 

[Turnadot]

Once murder turned into a mess, it seems like he would at least try to smudge out the foot prints he left in blood. Or even take the pillow with the foot print on it.

Is the theory that he only meant to strangle her to death? I've also heard that he probably delivered a few blows while she was still in bed. If he just wanted to strangle, why wouldn't he just try to pin her down and strangle her?

If there was a weapon(which I guess we can't really know) then it would seem like it was not meant to just be a strangulation. Did the prosecution/ME/anyone ever mention a weapon in the trial or was that just mentioned here?

Yes, but he had a mess on his hands, and he'd just killed someone. The adrenaline was pumping, he simply overlooked the prints.

Or he's not the killer.

 

[Madeleine74]

The reason he didn't call in a claim was he needed to file an official police report to list the 'stolen' items. That would require a statement to police.
That's the only answer.

ahhh bingo! Thanks for clarifying that. No statement, no way.

 

[Madeleine74]

About 7 yrs ago I had several items stolen out of my car, while my car was parked in front of my then-home. As I recall I did file a police report first and then sent that form and case # and info to my insurance co. No police report, no financial recovery.

 

[LOMom]

Ugh.

The jury doesn't need to have all the pieces to the puzzle (only the killer has those) - they just need enough pieces so that they can make out what the big picture says - guilty.

Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?

 

[Cammy]

Once murder turned into a mess, it seems like he would at least try to smudge out the foot prints he left in blood. Or even take the pillow with the foot print on it.

Is the theory that he only meant to strangle her to death? I've also heard that he probably delivered a few blows while she was still in bed. If he just wanted to strangle, why wouldn't he just try to pin her down and strangle her?

If there was a weapon(which I guess we can't really know) then it would seem like it was not meant to just be a strangulation. Did the prosecution/ME/anyone ever mention a weapon in the trial or was that just mentioned here?

If Michelle was asleep, Jason could have also smothered her with a pillow.

Ack, that sounds awful.

 

[Cammy]

Ugh.

The jury doesn't need to have all the pieces to the puzzle (only the killer has those) - they just enough pieces so that they can make out what the big picture says - guilty.

Or not guilty....

 

[fifteen89]

If they had immediately filed the insurance report, that would have been declared heartless, I'm sure.

And if they had immediately told police they would have been declared what? Helpful to the investigation in their efforts to find the 'real killer'?

IMO some things just aren't reasonable.

 

[JSR]

You have to purchase an individual policy covering jewelry and it can be quite high according to the value of the jewelry.

Did Jayson have this type of insurance.

We have it and it is a separate policy from our homeowners insurance. My husband also has a vast gun collection and is insured under another policy.

IMO

If your ring is over a carat then you buy the insurance no matter how expensive the insurance is. I can't imagine someone like Jason not insisting on insuring Michelle's ring.

I wore my engagement ring all of one week before we had it insured. I was terrified during that week. And we had it added to my now husband's home owners insurance, even though I didn't even live in the house at the time (we didn't live together until after we were married). It was certainly expensive to add my ring, but the alternative didn't sound too thrilling. Rings are considered investments and loss of a ring is not cheap to most people.

 

[Wolfpack]

And if they had immediately told police they would have been declared what? Helpful to the investigation in their efforts to find the 'real killer'?

IMO some things just aren't reasonable.

Or greedy? "He won't submit for a polygraph, but he'll tell us what he wants to cash in on."

 

[Cammy]

And if they had immediately told police they would have been declared what? Helpful to the investigation in their efforts to find the 'real killer'?

Somewhere there are $14,300 rings.......

Even if you think Jason took them, I doubt he would just get rid of them.

Besides, what was the purpose of Jason taking the rings. (don't say swallowing, please :wink

 

[Wolfpack]

If your ring is over a carat then you buy the insurance no matter how expensive the insurance is. I can't imagine someone like Jason not insisting on insuring Michelle's ring.

I wore my engagement ring all of one week before we had it insured. I was terrified during that week. And we had it added to my now husband's home owners insurance, even though I didn't even live in the house at the time (we didn't live together until after we were married). It was certainly expensive to add my ring, but the alternative didn't sound too thrilling. Rings are considered investments and loss of a ring is not cheap to most people.

I know! I know! I still don't have my ring insured though. eek.