State vs. Jason Lynn Young 2-22-2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #641
Been watching and reading. I really understand what folks said about the PT today. Their "big" points needed a sharpener.
 
  • #642
Yes, they do.
Why?

I doubt they will. The PT was weak wrt JY's prior testimony. So far I don't see a reason to put him back on the stand.

IMO
 
  • #643
glad I am out and can't watch this.
can't believe this PT is so weak. these are supposed to be the top 2...geez
He may walk because of their incompetence.

I have been thinking the very same thing. I hope both BH and HC retire after this case. They simply just don't have what it takes in my very humble opinion.
 
  • #644
May/07, she gave description of customer - shirt, no coat, blond hair, blue jeans. That was only time she provided description to Spivey. She never gave another description ... didn't describe height, weight, lots or little hair, eye color, facial features ... never further described clothing. She also mentioned another person in store when customer cursed at her ... claimed it was a regular customer ...she said that regular customer discussed the curser with her ...

:eek:
Ut oh, here we go !!

Look at all the customers that were in there right near the same time!!
 
  • #645
Why?

I doubt they will. The PT was weak wrt JY's prior testimony. So far I don't see a reason to put him back on the stand.

IMO

I was responding to the post asking if the defense team was the one to put them on the stand, not the prosecution. In other words, the prosecution can't put him on the stand, the defense has to.

He doesn't HAVE to take the stand by any means. But only one side can do it.
 
  • #646
I think he did it. But now think he will get another hung jury.

The pros is out lawyered.

JMO
 
  • #647
glad I am out and can't watch this.
can't believe this PT is so weak. these are supposed to be the top 2...geez
He may walk because of their incompetence.

That's an extremely accurate assessment of why I am so mad on all of this.

It's become a "see who can poke bigger holes in the life raft of the others" type of mess.
 
  • #648
This guy is good
 
  • #649
I wouldnt put him on the stand!!!! moo



There is no reason for him to take the stand now.

The Jurors saw him , the Pros blew it.
 
  • #650
... and the phone rings ... here
 
  • #651
  • #652
I was responding to the post asking if the defense team was the one to put them on the stand, not the prosecution. In other words, the prosecution can't put him on the stand, the defense has to.

He doesn't HAVE to take the stand by any means. But only one side can do it.
Sorry, I misunderstood the question to mean: does the defense have to put Jason on the stand to muffle the damage.
 
  • #653
There is no reason for him to take the stand now.

The Jurors saw him , the Pros blew it.

Yep, they blew it *****again*****.
 
  • #654
Doesn't the defense have to put him on the stand? thanks.

That's what I mean. I originally hoped the defense would put him on the stand again but now I'm afraid if he does testify the PT will blow it. Again.
 
  • #655
  • #656
Klinkosum talking about all the efforts that LE took to find the regular customer!!

Set up cameras for 60 days !!

They never showed the tapes to Gracie, so, why did they set up cameras?

Customer always came in between 5 and 5:30 am.
 
  • #657
OMG, they have had all this time to show her the tapes.............and they still didn't do it, even since the first trial.
 
  • #658
I feel like I want to throw something.
 
  • #659
We will see Mr young in the papers again one day! moo!!!!!:twocents:
 
  • #660
Now, we are moving on to the Ebay papers.

Oops, no they aren't.

They are going back to Gracie :woohoo:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
117
Guests online
3,112
Total visitors
3,229

Forum statistics

Threads
632,552
Messages
18,628,348
Members
243,196
Latest member
CaseyClosed
Back
Top