I think it was more likely an angry lesbian that had thought she was a virgin and got awfully upset and decided she had had enough or not enough?
Wow....ok then.
I think it was more likely an angry lesbian that had thought she was a virgin and got awfully upset and decided she had had enough or not enough?
I think it was more likely an angry lesbian that had thought she was a virgin and got awfully upset and decided she had had enough or not enough?
I need to find the link to David Saacks closing from JY Trial #1. I specifically remember he made a point to talk about JY's hand print on the sheetrock and how the blood splatter managed to not hit that print. Then he literally acted out how that would happen, showing him putting his left hand up and braced on the wall, and then bent over beating MY on the floor. I remember he said "think about that... blood spray going all over the wall...but none of it gets on the hand print. Now why would that happen and how could that happen? Because JY's hand was on the wall as the blood was spraying. Common sense."
VERY effective IMO. I remembered it.
Just THAT in itself is enough to convict. I mean, really. What OTHER plausible explanation could there be?
Except isn't the state's theory is he had gloves on, because if he did not have gloves on, then his hands would have scratches, right?
Because MY tried to pull the hands of her attacker off her neck.
Although, now there are no gloves in the hotel photo, which never made any sense to begin with.
Why would he take gloves in the hotel, when he didn't need them unless it was to keep the cigar
smoke off his hands?
:::shrugs:::
Except isn't the state's theory is he had gloves on, because if he did not have gloves on, then his hands would have scratches, right?
Because MY tried to pull the hands of her attacker off her neck.
Although, now there are no gloves in the hotel photo, which never made any sense to begin with.
Why would he take gloves in the hotel, when he didn't need them unless it was to keep the cigar
smoke off his hands?
:::shrugs:::
I think it was more likely an angry lesbian that had thought she was a virgin and got awfully upset and decided she had had enough or not enough?
Except isn't the state's theory is he had gloves on, because if he did not have gloves on, then his hands would have scratches, right?
Because MY tried to pull the hands of her attacker off her neck.
Although, now there are no gloves in the hotel photo, which never made any sense to begin with.
Why would he take gloves in the hotel, when he didn't need them unless it was to keep the cigar
smoke off his hands?
:::shrugs:::
I don't believe it is 100% that she would have been able to scratch him.
I don't believe it is 100% that she would have been able to scratch him.
To adjust the camera angle?
I think she was bashed over the head as she slept, and what ever feeble attempts she was able to make were just that, feeble and ineffectual. When one takes that hard a blow to the head, it's like being cold-cocked. MOO
Then why did Sheriff Donnie Harrison say that a struggle occurred?
Why did the Pros allude to MY fighting for her life in the first trial?
They might not want to do that this time around, come to think of it.
Not when the defendant has a perfectly clean NTO.
It could be as simple that the attacker was furious that she was pregnant.
His fantasy could have been an athletic brown haired women and he was angry that she ruined the fantasy by being pregnant.
I don't believe it is 100% that she would have been able to scratch him.
Everybody from the person cutting meat in the deli to the the maid at the hotel has disposable plastic gloves. There are boxes of these gloves on the maids carts and they would certainly be easily disposed of with little notice.
No great news that gloves were not spotted in the pictures or found. He tossed them.