State vs. Jason Lynn Young 2-22-2012

[fran]

This is what I've been saying. How unlucky can one person be?

On the EXACT night his wife and unborn son are murdered, someone unplugged the camera in the hallway towards his room, someone left a rock in the same door he's already admitted to leaving a twig in, but not a rock, yet his DNA can't be ruled out as moving the rock......... I know some other dude did it.

Then all the walking around he did in the am at the hotel, yet not ONE photo of him that morning.

Someone looking just like HIM got gas 45 minutes from his home where his wife and unborn baby were brutally murdered on the same day.

His shirt seen in the video at the hotel is missing?

His wife gave away his shoes that matched the bloody footprint at the crime scene.

Whoa is me.

Yeah, that's it, just one unlucky guy with a murdered wife and unborn child.


JMHO
fran

 

[Madeleine74]

It seems to me, or I should say I am somewhat surprised that they found no HI transfers on his clothing. I would expect if you stayed you would at least pickup some fibers? I guess not.

Perhaps because he spent less than 30 min at the hotel and wasn't rolling around on the bed or on the floor?

 

[borndem]

Ooh, who is this? I swear HC said yesterday that Spivey was their last witness.

Maybe they are planning on re-calling him to wrap it up...

 

[jamiect]

In addition to cashing in every single account I have, I would sell everything I owned as well if it meant I could keep my children. They are priceless.

ITA, I had to cash in, just to keep my house.. I would sell my soul for my kids.

 

[fran]

IMO, the prosecution has to present evidence like this to get it out there first. If they don't bring in everything in their case, the defense can bring it in on theirs - and that would make the state look shady. Best to get the bad facts out there and show the jury you aren't making stuff up to convict poor JY.

moo

EXACTLY KathrynL!

Withholding exculpatory evidence can be grounds for an appeal or mistrial. This pros is letting everything out on the table, both for and against the defendant. They're showing the jury they looked at all angles, but all the roads kept coming back to JY as the murderer!

JMHO
fran

 

[NCEast]

IMO, the prosecution has to present evidence like this to get it out there first. If they don't bring in everything in their case, the defense can bring it in on theirs - and that would make the state look shady. Best to get the bad facts out there and show the jury you aren't making stuff up to convict poor JY.

moo

I just flew in the kitchen and put a roast in the oven. While doing so, I decided the DNA witness was a pre-emptive strike mostly. Since none of the testimony did anything much for the prosecution.l I am still hoping the prosecution can recover and get something in that is solid, and unbuttable. That's not a word, I'm too tired.

 

[Boodles]

I'm almost convinced HC has early onset dementia. Why CW allows him to present cases in front of a jury is beyond me. He could sit quietly and do strategy.

Yes. It's not fair to anyone that he's in court trying a case.

 

[pjcitizen]

A court will not give your kids to your in-laws because you don't have a savings or retirement account and they do.

 

[ncsu95]

In addition to cashing in every single account I have, I would sell everything I owned as well if it meant I could keep my children. They are priceless.

I just have to say that I love the dog picture in your avatar. No better dog than a retriever.

 

[Cammy]

Court starts at 11:00 am, per tweets at WRAL

 

[Boodles]

No you did not hear that right.

The chance that someone ELSE other than JY left the finger/hand print on the sheet rock in his bedroom is 1 in 6.8 billion (in other words...it matches JY).

Alone this means nothing because it's his bedroom so you would expect that.

HOWEVER, there was some blood splatter on that wall and this splatter did not hit that finger/hand print where investigators expected a spray pattern would have. The theory is that JY had his hand on the wall for leverage as he was bent over beating his wife to death. Her blood spray went all over the wall and up to almost the ceiling, but not any on this particular finger/hand print. It won't be until closing that they point this out to the jury (as they did in Trial #1 during David Saacks closing). You may say "so what," but I think it's a very good point that needs to be made.

Too bad Madeleine can't be there doing an interpretation/translation for the jury, real time!

 

[Cammy]

I just flew in the kitchen and put a roast in the oven. While doing so, I decided the DNA witness was a pre-emptive strike mostly. Since none of the testimony did anything much for the prosecution.l I am still hoping the prosecution can recover and get something in that is solid, and unbuttable. That's not a word, I'm too tired.

Gosh, that sounds good...

I guess there is no chance a NG is invited to dinner......

 

[borndem]

Dang, she was making some pretty good money. Excess of 50k.

Her career and place at PE was on the rise; his was beginning to be a series of successive job failures. He really didn't care -- he was too busy with extra-curriculars.

 

[Madeleine74]

I just have to say that I love the dog picture in your avatar. No better dog than a retriever.

Ditto!

Or, as GritGuy hilariously referred to his:

A Labrador Deceiver!

I had a Golden Deceiver! and I miss her still.

 

[NCEast]

Gosh, that sounds good...

I guess there is no chance a NG is invited to dinner......

Of course! Try to be here by 7:30pm and bring a bottle of your favorite wine!

 

[Shelby1]

Before Mr. Shelby comes home:


Sprayed Fabreeze-check

Washed dishes-check

Threw in load of laundry-check

Dinner-I'm screwed *running around like a crazy person*

 

[Cammy]

If Jason's print was found in actual blood splatter, that would be it, as well.

He somehow just keeps getting around all the things that could tie this case together.

 

[borndem]

....just crazy....Becky is telling him what to do and where the papers are and what's what. The witness has said Prudential at least 4x already. He is not prepared. OK, I will stop now, but this is inexcusable.

This is extreme, even for him... he doesn't look like he feels good, and nearly everybody in the courtroom, it seems is hacking & sneezing...

 

[Cammy]

Of course! Try to be here by 7:30pm and bring a bottle of your favorite wine!

That is so sweet..!!

I think it is really classy when both sides of a case can get along......

 

[BrownRice]

Custody is based on best interests of the child. Someone without a home or a job and no savings versus someone with a home (Meredith) ... custody could very well have gone to Meredith regardless of how much money was spent.

Of course that is true. I would still spend EVERY penny I owned and sell everything I owned to have my chance in court to attempt to get custody.

And most often the court looks at many other things outside of finances to decide where the child will go (most of the time it is with the natural parent unless there is abuse or neglect). Obviously, not having a home would be an issue, but that wasn't the case with JY. He was with mama.