IMHO, when or IF the last pros witness testimony or worth of it is mentioned in the closing by the pros, it was to show another lie JY gave in his sworn testimony in the first trial. Evidence of him being a liar and cannot be trusted to what he states that may show he did NOT commit the crime of murder against Michelle.
It is to show he lied when he said it was because of the money involved that he relinquished custody of his daughter, because all he had to do was simply sign an agreement for a one year period of visitation. MF and LF wanted in writing that they could see CY, approximately every other month, supervised visits either in MF's home or PY's home.
It's also to show that they were NOT originally persuing JY as the 'slayer,' but merely for visitation they felt they were legally due, because of their relationship with CY previously.
It was to show how far JY and his family would go to deny the F's any contact with CY.
It was to show how the Y's even went so far as returning gifts from the F's unopened.
It's part of the puzzle that spells murder.
IMHO, some are getting too hung up on every piece of dust on the story. It's the facts that MAY get JY convicted. Each item in itself doesn't say the whole story, but is placed within the puzzle, that when all the pieces are placed, spell JY is the one who quietly entered the Y's home on the nite or Nov. 2nd, or early morning hours of Nov. 3rd, 2006, and beat and strangled Michelle Young until her last breath.
That's the big picture and I think the PROS as shown the entire puzzle, piece by piece by piece, over the past few weeks, and their closing statement or argument, will put it in a package that the jury can see as a whole. A picture of premeditated murder.
JMHO
of course,
fran
