What did judge say would be relevant but prejudicial? I got up when the jury was dismissed for break and then came back to the judge speaking.
Thanks in advance!
Notice how the witness is testifying about Michelle's mood, Michelle's statements, Michelle's actions.
and... that evidence is allowed.
and... the defense is not objecting to this line of questioning either.
bypasses the hearsay rule -- victim state of mind
OMG, Jason urinated on himself on a BET. ETA: He was naked, and in the Schaads livingroom. NOT unusual behavior.
Break for 15 min.
OMG, Jason urinated on himself on a BET. ETA: He was naked, and in the Schaads livingroom. NOT unusual behavior.
Break for 15 min.
Don't know if any of the cooper supporters are following this trial, but hopefully if any are, they will see that the cooper trial was NOT different from 95% of similar trials. If somebody shoots you down in a hold-up, 'state of mind of the victim' isn't usually a determining factor. But if an *intimate* acquaintance murders you, 99% of the time 'state of mind' IS important to the *motive* and as you said, bypasses the hearsay rule. The cooper trial was, IMO, fair and just.