State vs Jason Lynn Young 6-17-11

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #61
It "wasn't an issue" when the custody order stated "no smoking around Cassidy" but Jason couldn't stand it when Meredith smoked in his jeep. I guess she stopped smoking at some point.

Or she simply did not smoke indoors or around the child. I know plenty of parents who do not let their children see them smoke. But regardless, smoking bothered JY enough for him to make an express motion of it in the custody agreement.
 
  • #62
Knock her out...then strangulation...betcha that was the plan
 
  • #63
Or she simply did not smoke indoors or around the child. I know plenty of parents who do not let their children see them smoke. But regardless, smoking bothered JY enough for him to make an express motion of it in the custody agreement.

So it's a bit much to believe he was smoking a cigar at midnight at the Hampton Inn.
 
  • #64
Of course a 'knock out' is involved. He had to knock her out, so he could strangle her.
 
  • #65
Defense trying to keep the computer evidence out on the basis that the time of the search cannot be narrowed to a specific time, also arguing that "anatomy of a knockout" is inconsistent with the prosecution theory introduced in opening statements.
 
  • #66
Great....it comes in
 
  • #67
Computer searches are in!
 
  • #68
Another guy who thinks he's a computer genius and thinks by deleting files from your computer, they're gone!

Sorry charlie! Nope, won't happen. Just messes up dates and such and SHOWS it's been deleted.

Two searches Yahoo.com "Anatomny of a knock-out drug."
"Head trauma blackout." Web md was one search.
Terms used to search.

Just not sure when done, or same time, per judge. Aug 1 '04, so puter had been in use for two years at this period.

Judge, do we know anything about his employement? He's been in medical field, his business was a trip related to data collection file storing.

:eek:
fran

Oh, good grief! Is he going to claim this has to do with his employement?!

Judge inquiring into professional related search.

Def, argument, double problem, don't know when searches made. and if you put on top of that, blah, blah, blah.................could mislead jury. Unfair prejudice. def looking up head-blows etc, if that wasn't part of his plan. It's going to leave this jury with the impression of him looking out knock out and it's not part of the pros case, per pros opening statement.

Ahhhhh..............it's not fair! def asking judge to keep it out!........thinking, thinking, thinking..................

Judge, evidence to jury seems to defy single theory of what happened......pros, clear evidence weapon was used. by injuries. Because weapon was used,................................use of weapon to make her available to be strangled, is there, whether that's what happened,............

talking REALLY FAST!

confrontation started on bed and ended in pool of blood on the floor.

fits with evidence. Timing. on their home computer.

Sorry, you have to watch yourself to get everything.

Judge, two year time frame, it's for the jury to determine. Yes!!!!

Objection overruled!
 
  • #69
Overruled!:great:
 
  • #70
YES !

Guess Mr. Collins is not aware of the defendents 4th, 6th, and 14th amendments :D
 
  • #71
Great, CCBI and not SBI
 
  • #72
Somebody with certifications and training in computer forensics! See BC team, this is the kind of *expert witness* one retains to testify in court.
 
  • #73
She is an excellent witness....easy for jury to understand
 
  • #74
YES !

Guess Mr. Collins is not aware of the defendents 4th, 6th, and 14th amendments :D

No kidding. :floorlaugh:

It's such a pleasure to watch a *normal* trial. For those whom the cooper trail was one of their first experiences in criminal law, this is how, by far, the majority of trials and witnesses behave. An expert with credentials, certifications in the field, and she belongs to national and international organizations in her field of training. Certainly not *jay* what's his name. And I bet you *she* won't be posting here later tonight.
 
  • #75
You know we have had some great Forensic witnesses in this case. I have been impressed with CCBI, SBI, and FBI witnesses.
 
  • #76
Defense will ask if there is a way to tell which user performed the search. It won't matter, this is damning evidence against JLY.

She's doing a great job -- well-spoken and taking her time to break down the information to a level the average person can understand.
 
  • #77
Yes, GL, this is how most trials go. BC trial was a mess all the way around IMO.
 
  • #78
Hmmm...is anyone going to claim someone "planted" files on JLY's computer? Another item to add to the list of murdering husband commonalities: does Internet searches connected to murdering their wives at some point before they then do the deed. Wonder how long he spent on one of the pages? Apparently 41 seconds is not enough, but no one has specified the minimum amt that is 'enough.'
 
  • #79
This witness is outstanding! Clear, concise, superlative communicator! Brava!
 
  • #80
These searches + the shoes + the hotel video will, I believe, be hard, if not impossible, to overcome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
1,089
Total visitors
1,239

Forum statistics

Threads
632,312
Messages
18,624,572
Members
243,083
Latest member
Delmajesty
Back
Top