State wants answers from Baez

[MD MOMMY]

That's it. IF I were HHJP I would make ICA come to every single hearing status or not. I can't believe he wrote "This request to counsel that was written without a written filing, without poper notice, and without knowledge of the defendant Miss CA, was nonetheless complied with in open court for Mr. A to understand and was done in the spirit of cooperation." She waves her appearances so that is who's fault here?

 

[Lera213]

Seriously???

YEs, but I'm not in florida, sorry I should have included that part. I just thought it was Ironic that i got summons so close to when ICA jury was probably getting one too.

I have no idea what case, this will be my first time on a jury.

 

[Intermezzo]

That's it. IF I were HHJP I would make ICA come to every single hearing status or not. I can't believe he wrote "This request to counsel that was written without a written filing, without poper notice, and without knowledge of the defendant Miss CA, was nonetheless complied with in open court for Mr. A to understand and was done in the spirit of cooperation." She waves her appearances so that is who's fault here?

I always wondered why they would want to "waive her right" to attend hearings...There is our A-HA moment... so Baez could use it as an excuse

I have always believed that ICA should be in attendance at ALL Hearings and I agree with you...HHJP should now issue an Order requiring Casey to Attend ALL future hearings...no matter what.

 

[MD MOMMY]

YEs, but I'm not in florida, sorry I should have included that part. I just thought it was Ironic that i got summons so close to when ICA jury was probably getting one too.

I have no idea what case, this will be my first time on a jury.

Let's hope it's a short trial. May is right around the corner!

 

[Lera213]

Let's hope it's a short trial. May is right around the corner!

a little nervious because I've never sat on a jury before. I don't even follow my local news so have no idea even what possible case it might be. LOL.

I have to report on the 14th of march. I guess that is when jury voir dire is? I have no idea.

 

[MD MOMMY]

I always wondered why they would want to "waive her right" to attend hearings...There is our A-HA moment... so Baez could use it as an excuse

I have always believed that ICA should be in attendance at ALL Hearings and I agree with you...HHJP should now issue an Order requiring Casey to Attend ALL future hearings...no matter what.

I think they waive her right so the media doesn't "pick" on her. I don't think she should have been excused from one hearing. HHJP confirms before every status hearing that she has waived her right. I believe I've read something she signed stating the same thing. I don't *think* this excuse would fly. ITA she needs to be at every hearing. I think in DP cases in particular this should be the rule, no waiving hearings period. JMO.

 

[MD MOMMY]

a little nervious because I've never sat on a jury before. I don't even follow my local news so have no idea even what possible case it might be. LOL.

I have to report on the 14th of march. I guess that is when jury voir dire is? I have no idea.

I have been called for jury duty 3 times and Grand Jury duty once. They will ask you questions etc. you may be excused an never even have to sit on the jury. It's good that you have no clue, you sound like the perfect juror from a far LOL.

 

[faefrost]

That's it. IF I were HHJP I would make ICA come to every single hearing status or not. I can't believe he wrote "This request to counsel that was written without a written filing, without poper notice, and without knowledge of the defendant Miss CA, was nonetheless complied with in open court for Mr. A to understand and was done in the spirit of cooperation." She waves her appearances so that is who's fault here?

Someone forgot to tell JB that while is client is not required to attend the status hearings, she is not forbidden from doing so either. The option is hers and the courts do not slow or stop doing the peoples business depending on her whims or approval. It was an open hearing of the court. Matters were raised and rulings were handed down.

And really does JB truly want to dredge up exactly why his client is required to attend all but the most cursory housekeeping status hearings? HELLO JB! BOTH JUDGES MANDATED THAT SO YOUR CLIENT CAN CLOSELY OBSERVE AND JUDGE YOUR PERFORMANCE! Not so she may bestow her blessings or approval on the proceedings as a whole or in part. She attends because the Judges truly want her to make an informed educated decision on whether or not her privately hired, unpaid, defense is a pack of incompetent . Mr. Ashton and any actions he tales do not factor into her presence in the court. if you are in court and the judge is in court, and it is a duly opened and recorded court session, well thats all that JA needs.

 

[sleutherontheside]

a little nervious because I've never sat on a jury before. I don't even follow my local news so have no idea even what possible case it might be. LOL.

I have to report on the 14th of march. I guess that is when jury voir dire is? I have no idea.

Don't be nervous. Serving on a jury is an opportunity to facilitate the legal process. Relax, answer questions presented to you in a truthful manner, and remember that our legal system far outweighs the rest.

 

[Joan (Canada)]

That's it. IF I were HHJP I would make ICA come to every single hearing status or not. I can't believe he wrote "This request to counsel that was written without a written filing, without poper notice, and without knowledge of the defendant Miss CA, was nonetheless complied with in open court for Mr. A to understand and was done in the spirit of cooperation." She waves her appearances so that is who's fault here?

I agree and also at pratically every status hearing JB brings us some motion to discuss without her being there. Again, the arrogance is there. As I said on another thread, I hope he is not going for a "mistrial" or to get HHJP recused. L0L. Like that's going to happen.:floorlaugh:

 

[Lera213]

TY, I'll do my best and last OT comment: Me thinks the defense won't want me because even my own son said my facial expression always looks like I'm mad and other females over my life thought I was a "B" until they got to know me and realized they were so wrong about me. hehehehe

 

[kaRN]

I have to read this response in small doses. I just got to the part where JB and CM thought because HHJP said "I'll say this and end it here" that that was the end of it. I assume HHJP's order came AFTER the status hearing, which makes me think they didn't bother to read it. Oh, and ICA was not present? Because you waived her right to be there!!!!!!!!!!!

I got to page 9/34 of the drivel and realized this motion was about 31 pages longer than anything he's ever pleaded on behalf of his client. I stopped there and have no intention of reading further. By page 9 he accuses JA of being confused. :banghead: I hope the judge rips him a new one

 

[Lera213]

JB wants a circus trial the judge will not allow that at all.

JB will probably object throughout the trial for simple things like SA: "On Monday" JB: "I Object, I thought it was Tuesday not Monday"

 

[AZlawyer]

I got page 9/34 of the drivel and realized this motion was about 31 pages longer than anything he's ever pleaded on behalf of his client. I stopped there and have no intention of reading further. By page 9 he accuses JA of being confused. :banghead: I hope the judge rips him a new one

Do you have a link to a copy with the attachments?? The one I saw only had 9 pages.

 

[MD MOMMY]

Do you have a link to a copy with the attachments?? The one I saw only had 9 pages.

The pages on WESH stop at 9 out of 34!

 

[Jomo]

I got page 9/34 of the drivel and realized this motion was about 31 pages longer than anything he's ever pleaded on behalf of his client. I stopped there and have no intention of reading further. By page 9 he accuses JA of being confused. :banghead: I hope the judge rips him a new one

The motion to strike that is being referred to is only 8 pages long on the PDF, not 31 or 34. Are you sure you have the right motion?

http://www.wesh.com/pdf/27038010/detail.html

 

[AZlawyer]

The motion to strike that is being referred to is only 8 pages long on the PDF, not 31 or 34. Are you sure you have the right motion?

http://www.wesh.com/pdf/27038010/detail.html

The fax page numbers at the top indicate that it goes to p. 34, so I assume the additional pages are exhibits to the motion.

 

[MissJames]

I got a juror summons today

What's it gonna be ,girl ? Is it

or is it :great:

or :floorlaugh:

Do want to :sick:
or :woohoo:

No matter which case it is ,you are a :websleuther: and super
so don't anic:

You will :rocker: , unless you get booted off for being so "well informed".

 

[CarolinaMoon]

The fax page numbers at the top indicate that it goes to p. 34, so I assume the additional pages are exhibits to the motion.

I could also be his other motions we haven't seen yet. He did file a witness list.

Nah, that still wouldn't explain 34 pages...

 

[Horace Finklestein]

I got to page 9/34 of the drivel and realized this motion was about 31 pages longer than anything he's ever pleaded on behalf of his client. I stopped there and have no intention of reading further. By page 9 he accuses JA of being confused. :banghead: I hope the judge rips him a new one

He writes long motions when he is getting his "revenge" on people for questioning him or making him look bad. His true motivation is to himself and his vanity. He says he's pressed for time yet peruses the blogs and makes his personal anger at bloggers an issue in court, like he is doing with his feelings toward Mr. Ashton. Very bizarre way to spend time this close to trial. He fumbles/ignores simple things, but he roars like a lion when something unrelated to defending Casey ticks him off. In fact, he finds ways to MAKE his personal vendettas tenuously relevant to Casey's case so he has a way to voice them.