Ravyn
New Member
I'm just wondering cause maybe she had them on and chaged into the longjohns afterwards...
I don't think they were missing, but I am not sure when or IF they were taken into evidence. Anyone out there know?
PR put the longjohns on an awake JB.
I am having doubts that Patsy put long johns on a live JB at ALL, since JB was found wearing the long johns, and they had post mortem urine on them. I believe in the bed wetting theory. So, IF Patsy in fact put those long johns on JB, then JB wet the bed..and Patsy went off the deep end, and then she changed JB's underwear, and then she would have put those wet longjohns back onto JB's dead body. UNLESS...she wasn't wearing the long johns when she wet the bed, or she had two pair.
The only reason I asked about the black pants cause when someone dies the can release all body funtions so I wonder if this is what happen about the lonjohns she had on. Just wondering...
Postmortem urine release happens immediately after death- primary flaccidity relaxes ALL muscles. The bladder will always release urine. Healthy kidneys are always functioning, so the bladder always contains at least some urine. The sphincter muscle also relaxes, but feces will not always be released. It depends where the last food eaten was in the digestion process, and where the feces was in digestive system. The pineapple had not progressed that far along- some of it was still identifiable as pineapple. That's how we know it was the last thing eaten. Foods do not "leap frog" over each other in the digestive process. Foods that are easy to digest are processed faster, not out of eating order.
Soft, green fecal material was noted in JB's autopsy in an area where it would not have been quite at the point of excretion. So there was no fecal matter on the body or clothes.
JB'e urine stains were anterior (on the front of her long johns and panties). It would require laying on her stomach when it was released. This COULD have happened while she was alive 2 ways. If she had indeed gone to bed and asleep, she could have wet the bed. The urine could have been dried by the time she was redressed. We do know the urine was dried by the time she was found. While there was creatine (from dried urine) found on her sheets, that can't be dated so we can't tell when it was left. The other way it could have happened is if it was released as an extreme fear reaction as she was being strangled. I don't believe this was the case, as I believe she was unconscious when she was strangled.
Ok dumb question here - what did happen to everything in that house? I thought the R's never went back there. I'm curious as to what happened to all the furniture, beds, clothing, paintings etc?
Now I believe that the R's had the furniture, beds and stuff ship to the after the LE was done with it now but I might be wromg here..
If the carpets was replaced this could mean there was blood or and lest some evidence of something cause the R's covered all tracks...
Shortly after the Rs left, when the crime scene was released by LE, professional movers packed up the Rs furniture and personal belongings, eventually shipped to the Rs when they resettled in Atlanta.
Then the house was "sold" to a group of R friends and lawyers. While in their hands, the house was "cleaned"- rugs pulled up, and all the rooms pained white (PR was a big fan of wallpaper). Had anyone wanted to go back in for a closer look at the carpets, walls, etc. it would have been pointless.
After that, the house was sold a few more times, having been listed again within the past year. The latest remodeling/decorating was a big improvement, and the house looked very nice in the real estate photos.
Obviously the swing set stayed behind at the house. One of the subsequent owners sold it. I would have thought the sellers might want to keep the history of the swing set secret, after all the house address was changed at some point to discourage curiosity.
We'll never know what those carpets would have revealed or where. Urine, blood, fiber evidence. Where it was found would be very important to the case. The Rs were allowed to leave an active crime scene without being searched and without leaving behind the clothes they were wearing. No other people in that same situation would have gotten away with that.
Ripping up all the carpet ensured that virtually no evidence was left behind.
Yep...and isn't it "ironic" that a group of the Ramsey's friends...were the ones that had this done...along with removing the wallpaper and painting the walls ?![]()
Do you think that these people might had missed something, I know all the carpets are gone..
Not only ironic...also pretty transparent. You know what is ironic? That they either thought no on would think it suspicious that the house had been "whitewashed", or they didn't care. I bet on the latter.