Supreme Court Nominee #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #721
Incorrect. The multiple alleged victims are witnesses and witness testimony is evidence.
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.
 
  • #722
In this case unfortunately all other supposed witnesses claim to not recall anything about the incident.


this is not accurate at this point

more names have come out

and only last night came out and said they are fine to talk with the FBI

we need to see

best we can hope for is an amazing news week

they all need to come out on media

the investigation is a joke and something we just have to accept

best bet is do the perjury ( i saw several but it is actually 12 incidents of perjury)!

dems have some super smart folks -- will be interesting to see if more perjury stuff does not start to blossom around tues!!

that has nothing to do with a SC nominee being an alleged rapist
 
  • #723
Cotton says Feinstein will be investigated over leaked letter by Kavanaugh accuser

Feinstein, who represents California and who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, had received the letter from Ford sometime over the summer and was asked to keep it confidential. At some point, however, the letter was leaked to the press, although Feinstein denies that anyone in her office is responsible.

I really would like to know if someone from Senator Feinstein's office leaked the letter. How can she be so sure that no one did?

Cotton says Feinstein will be investigated over leaked letter by Kavanaugh accuser
 
  • #724
This reeks of enabling. Well, if the FBI isn't going to be able to look into how his drinking plays into this, let's hope those closest to BK plan an intervention if those closest to him deem it necessary.

I very much agree with you, @Cubby. Excellent point. This might be the attitude they’ve had about prior investigations, too, which might be why the behavior tied to his alcohol abuse wasn’t as prominently documented up to this point.

Speculating.
 
  • #725
  • #726
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.

Lol. Please consider reading/re-reading what I said.

The alleged victims are witnesses.

Their testimony is evidence, and their evidence cooberates not only the others’ experience, but can be loosely linked to dates, places, parties, etc. in which their alleged attacker was present.
 
Last edited:
  • #727
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.

we have to wait for all the folks stories to be nailed down

media all over the place

this week should add clarity

and i think Aventti is gonna be big a help!!
 
  • #728
Why do you believe Feinstein’s office might be the leaker? Honest question.

I think that it's possible because the revelation of the alleged assault may cause Kavanaugh to not be confirmed which is the goal of the democrats. JMO
 
  • #729
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.
Uncorroborated evidence is weak evidence in my opinion.
 
  • #730
Two people testified. Then millions had their say - CNN

180928211953-05-sunday-opinion-column-exlarge-169.jpg
 
  • #731
Why do you believe Feinstein’s office might be the leaker? Honest question.

and this is with all the stuff the last two years

who cares (where or how) a video comes out showing someone chopping someone's head off

the story should then change to the chopping off of someones head

not how the video showing someone's head be severed

in normal times

the story would change

if someone you love head was chopped off would you care how the video came out or would you want to focus on who chopped off your loved ones skull?

it is ludicrous

who cares - there is a possibility that a SC nominee raped a woman that should be the focus
 
  • #732
Go ahead and confirm someone from Animal House.... to the highest court in the land.... for life.
 
  • #733
No, that’s literally NOT the definition of mainstream news, coolj. Lol. Maybe that’s why there’s so much confusion. Do people really not know what it is?

It’s not one extreme or the other.

Which moderate, mostly slightly left or right leaning sources did you read?

They’re the most fair, unbiased and factual. THOSE are mainstream media sources.

I vehemently disagree. It is clear, if you pay attention, that news networks are being run by political philosophies. Their job is to report the truth. Not to report whatever their politically affiliated CEO's want reported.

You have been brainwashed. We all have been brainwashed.

JFK warned you America. Now his warnings are being validated.

I do not know wtf is going on or what entity is responsible , but the manipulation is clear.

It is as clear as day. Wake up!
 
  • #734
  • #735
Uncorroborated evidence is weak evidence in my opinion.


I know it is hard for all of us

we just have to wait for just a bit

all the misstatements will get cleared up

i vote by tues!!
 
  • #736
Why do you believe Feinstein’s office might be the leaker? Honest question.

Feinstein is the one who had a Chinese spy working for her for 20 years right?
 
  • #737
Sorry to have to insert actual FACTS about Feinstein & the letter.

1. Dr. F sent the letter to Feinstein, after attempting to get the info to the Senate via her rep, and the annoymous tipline at the WaPo. This is not disputed.

2. She told Feinstein she did not want to go public,and that she wanted the letter kept confidential. This is not disputed.

3. Feinstein did not initially share the letter with anyone, including any other Dem senator. This may be be disputed by repubs, but there is solid evidence to believe it's true.

4. When other Dems heard about the letter, and the fact Feinstein hadn't shared it with them, they were furious, accusatory, and had a showdown with Feinstein. This is undisputed.

5. Feinstein wanted to protect Ford's confidentiality. That isn't the whole reason why she held onto it. As she explained when she was confronted by Dem senators, she thought it was bad strategy to go after K on personal matters of any kind. Didn't think it was good strategy, thought it would backfire, and given Dr. F's unwillingness to go public, didn't think it was a viable strategy, even if theoretically a good one.

That Dems were pissed at her for making that determination unilaterally is undisputable based on the actual RECORD.

6. Feinstein, after confronted by Dems, sent the letter to the FBI. Undisputed.

7. Who leaked the letter after it was sent to the FBI? Feinstein didn't. She says her staff didn't , and given what had led up to the letter being leaked, there is no reason to disbelieve her/them.

8. Who else knew about the letter? Other senators. Their staff. Republican staff who heard the buzz. The WaPo. At least a handful of Dr. F's friends, and likely friends of those friends. Friends of the staffers, both repub & Dem. Etc. Washington is a VERY small town when it comes to this kind of info & it's spread.
 
  • #738
Did he forget? Very strange. One would think a Yale graduate would be common knowledge in the family.

IMO, he didn't forget; he is fully aware that he told yet another lie.

Legacy students are a well-known, guaranteed part of the Ivy League admissions process.

Brett Kavanaugh was born, bred, and groomed every single day of his privileged life, from zygote to birth to adulthood, to believe and never once doubt that he was/is a 'golden boy', that he was/is destined to ascend to the halls of power, whether in the private or public sector.

When Kavanaugh's so-called 'birthright' to American Male Aristocratic Power was threatened by credible allegations made by a 'lowly female' who dared to speak her truth - not only to corrupt power, but also against corrupt power - the entire world witnessed the fury of corrupt power gnashing its rotten teeth against any bit that would stall its unbridled stampede.

Make no mistake: During Dr. Blasey Ford's credible (across partisan lines) testimony, and during Judge Kavanaugh's subsequent testimony, we observed the centuries-long overdue unmasking of American Male Aristocratic Power.

The face behind that mask is hideous.

But here's the thing: the mask designed to hide the monster has been equally monstrous.

We simply haven't been paying attention.
 
  • #739
Incorrect. The multiple alleged victims are witnesses and witness testimony is evidence.
I said "all other" clearly meaning other than the accuser's. All other people who were supposed to have been at the party claim they don't recall. Yes, you have accuser's testimony that is considered evidence. But without corroborating witnesses, it's he said, she said.
 
  • #740
With the multitude of drunk parties, I imagine it is hard to remember a particular party if they were not the one assaulted.

I am glad you brought this up human. I have been giving a lot of thought on this particular subject. I do think it would be a very memorable event for her close friend.

Since CB did not drive back then it's logical she came with her close friend she has named as being there. Especially since her home was miles away from around the country club area where she thinks it took place.

So CB says it took place upstairs and she hid in the upstairs bathroom and by then everyone there was back down on the first floor continuing to party. That would also include her close friend.

Once the two guys are downstairs is when she left so no one would see her leaving.

But even if the guys there didn't notice Chrissy had disappeared... her close girlfriend definitely would. Within a few minutes of not seeing her come back down she would go looking for her friend.

Dr. Ford has said they were close friends. She would be frantic to find out Chrissy was no where to be found in the house nor did she even tell her she had left.

If her friend saw Chrissy was all of a sudden missing with no explanation she would at least see if she was walking home or drive the route trying to find her.. And if she didn't do any of these logical close friend acts.... she would certainly call her the next morning or go over to check on her asking...'Wth happened to you last night?.....you just disappeared and didn't even tell me you were leaving!!'

I think her close friend would certainly remember the night she all of a sudden disappeared at a party.

Imo that would be a very vivid memorable event if it happened to her close friend who DF
.says was there.

This particular party would be where Chrissy went upstairs and her close friend never saw her come back downstairs and never saw her again that night.

Yes indeed her close friend would have a vivid memory of that event if she had been there. Any close friend would remember when their friend just disappeared right in the middle of a party they both attended together.

Jmo
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
68
Guests online
1,772
Total visitors
1,840

Forum statistics

Threads
632,469
Messages
18,627,194
Members
243,163
Latest member
420Nana
Back
Top