Supreme Court Nominee #2

[CARIIS]

I think that it's possible because the revelation of the alleged assault may cause Kavanaugh to not be confirmed which is the goal of the democrats. JMO

well see

the focus needs to be on lying while in confirmation hearings

then the other stuff can be sorted out

but liar on the supreme court IMO is problematic

 

[human]

I vehemently disagree. It is clear, if you pay attention, that news networks are being run by political philosophies. Their job is to report the truth. Not to report whatever their politically affiliated CEO's want reported.

You have been brainwashed. We all have been brainwashed.

JFK warned you America. Now his warnings are being validated.

I do not know wtf is going on or what entity is responsible , but the manipulation is clear.

It is as clear as day. Wake up!

I think some of us know actual journalists a

IMO, he didn't forget; he is fully aware that he told yet another lie.

Legacy students are a well-known, guaranteed part of the Ivy League admissions process.

Brett Kavanaugh was born, bred, and groomed every single day of his privileged life, from zygote to birth to adulthood, to believe and never once doubt that he was/is a 'golden boy', that he was/is destined to ascend to the halls of power, whether in the private or public sector.

When Kavanaugh's so-called 'birthright' to American Male Aristocratic Power was threatened by credible allegations made by a 'lowly female' who dared to speak her truth - not only to corrupt power, but also against corrupt power - the entire world witnessed the fury of corrupt power gnashing its rotten teeth against any bit that would stall its unbridled stampede.

Make no mistake: During Dr. Blasey Ford's credible (across partisan lines) testimony, and during Judge Kavanaugh's subsequent testimony, we observed the centuries-long overdue unmasking of American Male Aristocratic Power.

The face behind that mask is hideous.

But here's the thing: the mask designed to hide the monster has been equally monstrous.

We simply haven't been paying attention.

Incredible post!

 

[jjenny]

Lol. Please consider reading/re-reading what I said.

The alleged victims are witnesses.

Their testimony is evidence, and their evidence cooberates not only the others’ experience, but can be loosely linked to dates, places, parties, etc. in which their alleged attacker was present.

Loosely? Is that enough to be found guilty beyond the reasonable doubt? When exactly did it happen? Where exactly did it happen? We don't even know that.

 

[CARIIS]

IMO, he didn't forget; he is fully aware that he told yet another lie.

Legacy students are a well-known, guaranteed part of the Ivy League admissions process.

Brett Kavanaugh was born, bred, and groomed every single day of his privileged life, from zygote to birth to adulthood, to believe and never once doubt that he was/is a 'golden boy', that he was/is destined to ascend to the halls of power, whether in the private or public sector.

When Kavanaugh's so-called 'birthright' to American Male Aristocratic Power was threatened by credible allegations made by a 'lowly female' who dared to speak her truth - not only to corrupt power, but also against corrupt power - the entire world witnessed the fury of corrupt power gnashing its rotten teeth against any bit that would stall its unbridled stampede.

Make no mistake: During Dr. Blasey Ford's credible (across partisan lines) testimony, and during Judge Kavanaugh's subsequent testimony, we observed the centuries-long overdue unmasking of American Male Aristocratic Power.

The face behind that mask is hideous.

But here's the thing: the mask designed to hide the monster has been equally monstrous.

We simply haven't been paying attention.

it was identical to a road rage incident

he was deplorable

i feel for his wife if she ever bought up him addressing his behavior while he just drinking beer

well see

this of course is speculation at this point

like really this is some big dem CT - it only came up in therapy 6 years ago when it became confusing to the husband as to why his wife desperatly needed two doors so she could feel safe

yeh bla bla in 2012 dems had a fututre glasses on and said ok we have to prepare for putin to get trump in

and he is gonna appoint a sick dude to the SC

so in couple therpaies 6 years ago we are gonna get our smear campagin rolling

and then we will have our therapist risk losing his her livilhood by writing up a false progress note

and then in this big hillary campaign (which had not started for years) we will pay to have two doors installed on our home

and then 6 years ago i am going to put my husband at risk for going to prison for lying about it

and then 6 years ago i am fine with subjecting my kids my death threats

and then i am fine with incurring the costs of fleeing my house

and hiring attorneys

and 6 years ago putting my career on the line

and then i going to subject myself to recalling horrid night in my life

talk about a paranoid nation

and then I am going to think 6 years ahead and start planning with my best friends to plant seeds that this happened three decades ago

then on national tv i am gonna beg to just pls find out when he was at Safeway

and then she had to plan for Judge to put in his books years ago that he described to a tee that he worked at a grocery store

and then i need to make sure that part of the book matches up exactly up exactly (6 years ago) that his job was to arrange shopping carts which he describes in his book years ago

and then i am gonna start a smear campaign before knowing if the guy who would get the nomination before that happened

then i am begging for an FBI investigation while as a educated woman am willing to go to prison for lying to the fbi because i am a fortune teller and know 6 years earlier that he must not get on the sc - before putin gets trump in

and i have decided that should it be that way i will go get seperated from my kids for around 5 years after being locked up for making all this up 6 years ago

then 6 years ago i had to arrange other people to come out with allegations

and i knew it might be risky to put a bunch of other people at risk for going to prison to help me bring down the SC nomination

but 6 years ago i decided it was worth giving up all my degrees I earned for this false claim

and then I spent time trying to find an encrypted new organization to share all the things i made up for the clintons

and then I publically begged the FBI to come talk to me even tho I knew 6 years ago i was making all this up and could go to the penn for lying to the feds

and then after 6 years before he was even nominated I had trouble deciding, after all this planning if I wanted to proceed

then i held on that fear and did not come forward until media was crashing my classes and my students

and then truth be known i should have no worries i rival Meryl Streep in my story on global tv .

and then i planed 6 years ago how to bring the nation to tears when asked ( i knew of course they would do this) when describing that the most horrid part of it was them laughing at me as two men were hopping on top of me while one is trying to rip my clothes off

and the six years ago i kinda knew if i added to my lie that he tried to keep me from screaming that would be captivating 6 years before he was even nominated

 

[rosemadderlake]

I wonder if Professor Ford has tried hypnosis. To try and help her piece together where this house was and how she got home, who drove her, did she walk or run the whole way, hitchhiking was considered too dangerous, happen to run into another friend? Too afraid to say? --Just some thoughts...

I know trauma memory works in mysterious ways. In one traumatic event in my life some 40 years ago I can remember very specifically exactly what happened next, how I got there, who I talked to, etc.

I think the FBI might be able to find out when and where this party occurred.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Sorry to have to insert actual FACTS about Feinstein & the letter.

1. Dr. F sent the letter to Feinstein, after attempting to get the info to the Senate via her rep, and the annoymous tipline at the WaPo. This is not disputed.

2. She told Feinstein she did not want to go public,and that she wanted the letter kept confidential. This is not disputed.

3. Feinstein did not initially share the letter with anyone, including any other Dem senator. This may be be disputed by repubs, but there is solid evidence to believe it's true.

4. When other Dems heard about the letter, and the fact Feinstein hadn't shared it with them, they were furious, accusatory, and had a showdown with Feinstein. This is undisputed.

5. Feinstein wanted to protect Ford's confidentiality. That isn't the whole reason why she held onto it. As she explained when she was confronted by Dem senators, she thought it was bad strategy to go after K on personal matters of any kind. Didn't think it was good strategy, thought it would backfire, and given Dr. F's unwillingness to go public, didn't think it was a viable strategy, even if theoretically a good one.

That Dems were pissed at her for making that determination unilaterally is undisputable based on the actual RECORD.

6. Feinstein, after confronted by Dems, sent the letter to the FBI. Undisputed.

7. Who leaked the letter after it was sent to the FBI? Feinstein didn't. She says her staff didn't , and given what had led up to the letter being leaked, there is no reason to disbelieve her/them.

8. Who else knew about the letter? Other senators. Their staff. Republican staff who heard the buzz. The WaPo. At least a handful of Dr. F's friends, and likely friends of those friends. Friends of the staffers, both repub & Dem. Etc. Washington is a VERY small town when it comes to this kind of info & it's spread.

In #3 you have Feinstein not sharing the letter with anyone including democrat Senators because of "solid evidence" but you didn't give us that evidence.

.

 

[jjenny]

I wonder if Professor Ford has tried hypnosis. To try and help her piece together where this house was and how she got home, who drove her, did she walk or run the whole way, hitchhiking was considered too dangerous, happen to run into another friend? Too afraid to say? --Just some thoughts...

I know trauma memory works in mysterious ways. In one traumatic event in my life some 40 years ago I can remember very specifically exactly what happened next, how I got there, who I talked to, etc.

I think the FBI might be able to find out when and where this party occurred.

Hypnosis? Memory produced under hypnosis is going to be considered reliable? I don't think so.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I wonder if Professor Ford has tried hypnosis. To try and help her piece together where this house was and how she got home, who drove her, did she walk or run the whole way, hitchhiking was considered too dangerous, happen to run into another friend? Too afraid to say? --Just some thoughts...

I know trauma memory works in mysterious ways. In one traumatic event in my life some 40 years ago I can remember very specifically exactly what happened next, how I got there, who I talked to, etc.

I think the FBI might be able to find out when and where this party occurred.

If there is a way for Dr Ford to improve her memory and at the very least say where the assault occurred it would give investigators somewhere to look for corroborating evidence.

JMO

 

[human]

I am glad you brought this up human. I have been giving a lot of thought on that particular subject. I do think it would be a very memorable event for her close friend.

Since CB did not drive back then it's logical she came with her close friend she has named as being there. Especially since her home was miles away from around the country club area where she thinks it took place.

So CB says it took place upstairs and she hid in the upstairs bathroom and by then everyone there was back down on the first floor continuing to party. That would also include her close friend.

Once the two guys are downstairs is when she left so no one would see her leaving.

But even if the guys there didn't notice Chrissy had disappeared... her close girlfriend definitely would.

Dr. Ford has said they were close friends. She would be frantic to find out Chrissy was no where to be found nor did she even tell her she had left.

If her friend saw Chrissy was all of a sudden missing with no explanation she would at least see if she was walking home. And if she didn't do any of these logical close friend acts.... she would certainly call her the next morning or go over to check on her asking...'Wth happened to you last night?.....you just disappeared and didn't even tell me you were leaving!!'

I think her close friend would certainly remember the night she all of a sudden disappeared at a party.

Imo that would be a very vivid memorable event if it happened to her close friend who DF
.says was there.

This particular party would be where Chrissy went upstairs and her close friend never saw her come back downstairs and never saw her again that night.

Yes indeed her close friend would have a vivid memory of that event if she had been there. Any close friend would remember when their friend just disappeared right in the middle of a party they both attended.

Jmo

I am curious. How many people that attended college went to parties where there was drinking? I really did not in high school even though every summer was spent at a country club . There were the boys who did it, but my friends and I did not attend. Only heard rumors.

The most exciting boy was a boy who attended a prep school and boarded there, His name was spoken with awe,He could water ski barefoot.

In collge, there are where the parties began. I guess we were selfish and worried about our own selves, I don’t remember anyone wondering about anyone else,

It was not in MN, but I worked at a resort one summer on the East Coast. I remember a drunken pool party but I have no recollection of how I or my best friend got home now that I think about it,

And even though the boys were drunk, I don’t recall assaults.There were lots of wild drunken parties that summer of college kids working at a famcy resort. But I do not recall any assaults.

 

[jjenny]

If there is a way for Dr Ford to improve her memory and at the very least say where the assault occurred it would give investigators somewhere to look for corroborating evidence.

JMO

The problem with hypnosis is that you don't know if the memory is improved or false. Good article about using hypnosis as a forensic tool.
"But since its heyday in the 1970s and '80s, forensic hypnosis has not only dwindled rapidly, but hypnotically induced evidence has been banned in some places as unreliable."
Texas uses hypnosis to investigate crimes. Dallas death row inmates say it's time to stop | Crime | Dallas News

 

[black_squirrel]

I wonder if Professor Ford has tried hypnosis. To try and help her piece together where this house was and how she got home, who drove her, did she walk or run the whole way, hitchhiking was considered too dangerous, happen to run into another friend? Too afraid to say? --Just some thoughts...

I know trauma memory works in mysterious ways. In one traumatic event in my life some 40 years ago I can remember very specifically exactly what happened next, how I got there, who I talked to, etc.

I think the FBI might be able to find out when and where this party occurred.

It should be possible to figure this out. If it wasn't timmy's house (that was far away from the country club) then it could have been someone else's house. Maybe it was Tobin's house, or Mark Judge's house. Has anyone checked these possibilities. Did any of Kavanaugh's friends live close to that country club?

 

[MyBelle]

Uncorroborated evidence is weak evidence in my opinion.

ITA. uncorroborated evidence is pretty much useless to a prosecutor.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Hypnosis? Memory produced under hypnosis is going to be considered reliable? I don't think so.

True. If the hypnosis didn't provide any leads that would bring corroborating evidence it wouldn't have much weight.

Just like the polygraph doesn't carry much weight for me. JMO

 

[frisson]

So DJT is now running the FBI.
Go ahead, make a nameplate for the newest member of the SCOTUS. Everyone else can go home now.

So much WORD. ... PREACH. yes...yes

 

[Hope4More]

In #3 you have Feinstein not sharing the letter with anyone including democrat Senators because of "solid evidence" but you didn't give us that evidence.

.

I'm handicapped by being on my phone & unable to provide/post links. Feinstein not sharing the letter & dems' outrage was covered extensively in the news. Many on SM were ready to all but lynch her for not sharing the letter with them, because many believed it entirely fair & relevant to use ( I don't remember specifics, if there were any , about how any of those Senators proposed handling the not-insignificant problem that Dr. Ford did NOT want her name known. I'm guessing sending the letter to the FBI was a compromise- the allegations could be investigated - theoretically- but, confidentially, without her name being made public, and, perhaps, to keep her name from being known by the WH & Federalist goon squad who they KNEW would immediately set out to destroy her credibility. As they did. And are doing right now, with incredibly slimy personal attacks on her via SM in particular.

 

[frisson]

In case anyone needs comic relief here's the link to SNL's opening last night. Hilarious.

BRILL , as the kids say. I cried laughing.

 

[CoolJ]

IMO, he didn't forget; he is fully aware that he told yet another lie.

Legacy students are a well-known, guaranteed part of the Ivy League admissions process.

Brett Kavanaugh was born, bred, and groomed every single day of his privileged life, from zygote to birth to adulthood, to believe and never once doubt that he was/is a 'golden boy', that he was/is destined to ascend to the halls of power, whether in the private or public sector.

When Kavanaugh's so-called 'birthright' to American Male Aristocratic Power was threatened by credible allegations made by a 'lowly female' who dared to speak her truth - not only to corrupt power, but also against corrupt power - the entire world witnessed the fury of corrupt power gnashing its rotten teeth against any bit that would stall its unbridled stampede.

Make no mistake: During Dr. Blasey Ford's credible (across partisan lines) testimony, and during Judge Kavanaugh's subsequent testimony, we observed the centuries-long overdue unmasking of American Male Aristocratic Power.

The face behind that mask is hideous.

But here's the thing: the mask designed to hide the monster has been equally monstrous.

We simply haven't been paying attention.

Good post, I just hope everyone realises that the mask hiding the monster is non-partisan.

 

[Hope4More]

It should be possible to figure this out. If it wasn't timmy's house (that was far away from the country club) then it could have been someone else's house. Maybe it was Tobin's house, or Mark Judge's house. Has anyone checked these possibilities. Did any of Kavanaugh's friends live close to that country club?

Others elsewhere have sleuthed the bejeebers out of this. One consensus possiblity: Judge's grandparents owned a house that fits location criteria and Judge was known to have parties there.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I'm handicapped by being on my phone & unable to provide/post links. Feinstein not sharing the letter & dems' outrage was covered extensively in the news. Many on SM were ready to all but lynch her for not sharing the letter with them, because many believed it entirely fair & relevant to use ( I don't remember specifics, if there were any , about how any of those Senators proposed handling the not-insignificant problem that Dr. Ford did NOT want her name known. I'm guessing sending the letter to the FBI was a compromise- the allegations could be investigated - theoretically- but, confidentially, without her name being made public, and, perhaps, to keep her name from being known by the WH & Federalist goon squad who they KNEW would immediately set out to destroy her credibility. As they did. And are doing right now, with incredibly slimy personal attacks on her via SM in particular.

I'm trying to figure out why it's impossible for someone in Senator Fienstein's office to have leaked the letter.

 

[CoolJ]

I'm trying to figure out why it's impossible for someone in Senator Fienstein's office to have leaked the letter.

RANCH my friend, not only is it possible, it is likely considering she had a Chinese spy working for her for 20 yrs.

Opinion | Explain the Chinese spy, Sen. Feinstein

MSM basically ignored this story. I guess it wasn't newsworthy LOL