Something just occurred to me while listening to LO in this commentary -
It's not that something was said that was profound - my realization is what has not been said by anyone arguing for BK to be elevated to SCOTUS.
What exactly qualifies him? There is a huge argument for and against with no reason by anyone arguing for BK's appointment. Not one and I have been reading much of what is out there.
When one puts everything aside, what exactly is it that BK will bring that no one else can?
I respect CBF's bravery to no end - she had nothing to gain by coming forward and much to lose. So why has this appointment become about CBF accusations and nothing about BK qualifications? Not one senator voting for this appointment has given any commentary on why they think he is the best of the best.
Someone desperately wants this guy in imo, and it's not the WH. Imo, no one in the WH really knows about such things - which among them has the experience to know any better and what the ramifications will be in the long term?
Someone is dancing the American people around with - look here, don't look over there. And that person(s) is doing a good job imo.
I respectfully challenge those posting here for the appointment of BK to give a statement as to why he is the only good choice at that time for SCOTUS. IOW - what is your specific reasoning for supporting this nomination? Imo it will go a long way to supporting your senators opinion and why the world should listen and agree.