I don't understand why Susan's parents aren't pushing for custody - at least temporary custody. Seems to me there is a basis for her parent's to begin building a case for it; yet, from what I've seen here they just don't seem to be so inclined. There are certainly enough questions that need to be answered - I mean, camping? Really?
I followed the Nancy Cooper case in Cary, NC in which the husband was recently arrested. They had two small children also and her parents were right on top of the custody issue from the get-go. I know the circumstances are different between the two cases, but...I just don't get it.:waitasec:
First of all, let me make it very clear that I do not approve of JP not allowing frequent, ongoing visitations between Susan's parents, Chuck and Judy Cox, nor do I think it is the children's best interest not to have frequent, ongoing contact with Susan's other siblings and cousins who live in Puyallup, Washington.
Having said that, JP is the boy's father and has full legal custody of them and has the right to make any and all decisions concerning where and with whom the boys live and whom they do or do not have contact with.
JP has done nothing that would warrant the children being taken out of his custody and placed in a foster home or with a predesignated, pre-appointed legal guardian.
JP did allow the boys to spend unsupervised time with their grandparents, Chuck and Judy Cox, during the Christmas holiday season. Apparently, JP has decided, or his attorney has advised him, that allowing this contact is not in the best interest of JP.
I am assuming JP did not consult his attorney, prior to allowing the boys to spend unsupervised time with the Cox's, who, upon learning of the visitation, advised JP against allowing any further unsupervised visitations.
I was very surprised and confused when I read the Cox's were allowed to have the boys visit with them at their home without JP being present. I do not think JP's attorney was consulted.
Since the boys were in the Powell's West Valley City home the night JP left to go camping, they may have seen or heard things that would help solve this case. They were, as we all know, with JP between the hours of 12:30 AM, December 7, 2009 until 5:00 PM on Sunday, December 7, 2009. Because of this, it would be fair to assume that the boys, especially the five-year-old, is capable of releasing information that JP and his attorney do not want known.
I remember when I was five years old. I was totally capable of communicating what I saw and heard. So is the oldest boy.
In conclusion, my point is this: JP has done nothing that could justify the boys being removed from his custody, at least nothing that can be proven at this time.
If the Cox's were to file a custody suit, that would start a war between the Powell's and the Cox's which would guarantee JP would not allow them to see the boys while he is present, much less unsupervised.