Talk on the Net/Blogs/Round town about this case - NOT FACTS/RUMORS *merged*

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK I understand now, but I hadn't heard the story yet so didn't realize it was old.
No worries. It was just misleading in that it looked like a new story and was perhaps related to caylee. Apparently it is unrelated based on the timing.
 
Don't want to be a party pooper here, and forgive me if this was mentioned before, but if Caylee was found LE is obligated by law to disclose that fact to her next of kin. LE is entitled to do an autopsy, dna testing to determine who it is, etc. but once that's done they are required to release the body to the next of kin. They can't just sit on it. It is possible, however, if it were human remains, that they are testing it to determine the identify first.
 
Thanks for the info........

Good Luck with your 'catch-up'........this thread/posts seem to come & go, LOL.......I was on here this AM & poof !! it was gone, then it was back....a couple times......now I see it's been 'merged', kinda makes it hard to follow.

I sure am glad you said that because I thought I was losing what little bit of mind I had left!!

Here's why:

about 20 minutes ago I saw a thread that said 'body found - along with child's building blocks' ----- when I clicked on the thread it told me I didn't have access to that page. When I back arrowed to see the list of threads again --- it was GONE!

Anyone else see it?
 
Hi guys. it is okay to talk about, it is just an old story and was misleading.

Sorry JBean, I posted that story earlier. I found it on FOX Orlando Blog site. Posted there tonight, by justmelaura13 at 10:01pm
I then searched news sites trying to find the article, and couldn't.
Heck, no wonder... if it was from June!
I am so sorry! I didn't mean to cause any disturbance or any extra work for any of you mods.

http://community.myfoxorlando.com/blogs/WOFL/2008/08/04/The_Search_for_Caylee_Anthony?page_no=2270
 
Don't want to be a party pooper here, and forgive me if this was mentioned before, but if Caylee was found LE is obligated by law to disclose that fact to her next of kin. LE is entitled to do an autopsy, dna testing to determine who it is, etc. but once that's done they are required to release the body to the next of kin. They can't just sit on it. It is possible, however, if it were human remains, that they are testing it to determine the identify first.

I asked that ? a couple of days ago and was told that because of how long she's been gone, immediate confirmation by the family would be impossible (what I mean is, cindy or george couldn't look at her and say, yes thats her) because she would be so badly decomposed. So, LE would have to do dental or dna bones which could take a little longer to get results back. Also, why tell cindy and george if you don't know for sure it is Caylee.
 
Sorry JBean, I posted that story earlier. I found it on FOX Orlando Blog site. Posted there tonight, by justmelaura13 at 10:01pm
I then searched news sites trying to find the article, and couldn't.
Heck, no wonder... if it was from June!
I am so sorry! I didn't mean to cause any disturbance or any extra work for any of you mods.

http://community.myfoxorlando.com/blogs/WOFL/2008/08/04/The_Search_for_Caylee_Anthony?page_no=2270

Not a problem Sweetmop. You know the sleuthers around this joint will get to the bottom of everything asap. :)
I wonder if it is even in our crimes forum?
 
Sorry JBean, I posted that story earlier. I found it on FOX Orlando Blog site. Posted there tonight, by justmelaura13 at 10:01pm
I then searched news sites trying to find the article, and couldn't.
Heck, no wonder... if it was from June!
I am so sorry! I didn't mean to cause any disturbance or any extra work for any of you mods.

http://community.myfoxorlando.com/blogs/WOFL/2008/08/04/The_Search_for_Caylee_Anthony?page_no=2270


Ahhhh, sweetmop, everyone is just so excited wanting Caylee to be found (well maybe excited is not the word, but you know what I mean) You were just trying to give us some stuff to sleuth over. God love ya! Big hug :blowkiss:
 
I wonder if this is why JB filed his little motion today to keep LE from doing any further testing of evidence? Because he wants to help select the labs...OR he thinks that perhaps something WAS found and he in no way wants them testing THAT???

He can FILE whatever motion he wants. He still needs to convince the judge this is warranted, and the judge must AGREE. Frankly, I'd be surprised since the FBI labs are involved. I think it's a huge step to presume to discredit the FBI forensic labs.
 
Don't want to be a party pooper here, and forgive me if this was mentioned before, but if Caylee was found LE is obligated by law to disclose that fact to her next of kin. LE is entitled to do an autopsy, dna testing to determine who it is, etc. but once that's done they are required to release the body to the next of kin. They can't just sit on it. It is possible, however, if it were human remains, that they are testing it to determine the identify first.

Not true.
 
Ahhhh, sweetmop, everyone is just so excited wanting Caylee to be found (well maybe excited is not the word, but you know what I mean) You were just trying to give us some stuff to sleuth over. God love ya! Big hug :blowkiss:


:blowkiss: ditto..
 
Not a problem Sweetmop. You know the sleuthers around this joint will get to the bottom of everything asap. :)
I wonder if it is even in our crimes forum?

Thank you JBean.:heart:
I appreciate your kindness.
 
Goodness no I'm not mad at you for bringing info you found!!! I'm nobody but I'm certainly not mad! I do however question things when they come.

That's why I like the idea of a 'rumors thread'...so we don't get stuff shut down just because it isn't "news". I like to be able to read all the stuff and decide for myself if it's worth taking into my 'fact bag'.

A rumor thread could have stuff on it and be bumped as unconfirmed news happens. jmo, of course.

Isn't the thread heading, "Talk on the Net/Blogs about this case - NOT FACTS *merged*" an adequate thread heading? Isn't that sufficient?
 
Ahhhh, sweetmop, everyone is just so excited wanting Caylee to be found (well maybe excited is not the word, but you know what I mean) You were just trying to give us some stuff to sleuth over. God love ya! Big hug :blowkiss:
Oh thank you sweetie:blowkiss: Thank you for your kind words!
 
Wonder how long it takes to make a positive ID (for next of kin notification), since it's been like two months ???

Also wonder if LE would combine 'notification' with an arrest ??

Yeah, Scott Peterson's "notification" was his arrest before he could flee La Jolla to the Mexican border only 30 mi/ away.
 
It just doesn't make sense that only a few days after LE gave Tim money, planes, boats, mounted LE officials and more that the search would abruptly end. The excuse of waiting until the water recedes doesn't make sense either because there are far more dry places that could have been searched.

Pluse only days earlier TES was begging for more volunteers to help search. They wouldn't have done that unless there were areas that COULD safely be searched.

I suspect that it is not that there are no possible areas to be searched. Rather I think that something discovered or some new turn in the case may have narrowed down the area LE is looking at, to a very high degree. And it may be one of those areas in water that they are certain she is in.
 
The video about the body found in Jacksonville states that the investigators said that the skull was too big to be that of a child's. And it was found back in June.

God forbid anything happen to my kids! LOL! I had better keep their head measurements on hand...You see, they have BIG heads! My youngest Sons head was so big, as a 10 year old, he wore the largest hockey helmet for an Adult! My Daughters, is off the charts, the ped, tells me...I uv 'em, anyways! :)

Bring on the jokes! :)
 
This thread was started with info taken out of context from a FOX blog which this poster is a member. It was discussed with this blogger regarding the inappropriateness of creating a thread based on misinformation. I was a part of those post and urged this WS member to not "cut and paste" info to sensationalize a story.

I contacted Trish to request the thread be taken down and was assured it would be, but I see it's only been disguised under a new title.

Mrb was not even the person blogging info, only responded. As I stated, this thread has been created by snips from another blog and been totally taken out of context to create a sensationalize story.
 
I have read where R>>>>> has stated that she was bullied by others at FOX Blog. That is simply not true and is a testiment to the false info she has posted on this thread. I was a part of that blogging and we were trying to inform her that starting a "rumor" based on someone's interpretation of something was wrong. This entire thread is based on a portion of a blog that went on over a two hour period in which it was stated that the searcher had only made an interpretation of what she "thought" had happened; no true facts.
 
Isn't the thread heading, "Talk on the Net/Blogs about this case - NOT FACTS *merged*" an adequate thread heading? Isn't that sufficient?
Tate, the post you quote was made wee hours yesterday morning, when the thread wasn't called this. Thank you :) happy sleuthing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
196
Guests online
435
Total visitors
631

Forum statistics

Threads
625,789
Messages
18,510,043
Members
240,845
Latest member
tillynz
Back
Top