- Joined
- Apr 6, 2018
- Messages
- 2,604
- Reaction score
- 7,006
They had a vile or Bundy’s blood that was found in 2011. They used the vile to get DNA to test against the physical evidence recovered from Ann Marie Burr’s house but the results were inconclusive.From the second article…
“The state crime lab got new technology in 2023 that allows investigators to extract DNA from samples even if they are small, degraded from age or contain DNA from multiple people, he said. That technology allowed them to identify a single male DNA profile, which they submitted to a national law enforcement database.
Bundy’s DNA was a match, Mason said.
That profile can now be used by other law enforcement agencies who have long suspected Bundy of additional unsolved killings, he said, adding that more families could get similar closure.” (bolded by me)
Does this mean we didn’t have a DNA profile for Bundy prior to this??
Even in 2011, DNA testing was nowhere near as advanced as it’s gotten in the past few years. I have a feeling it will be a lot easier to exclude Bundy as a suspect in cases now.
Perhaps they can also retest the skeletal remains found in 1989 where Bundy claimed Nancy Wilcox was buried. I don’t know if those remains were determined to be human or not.