IMHO, it's irrelevant if she or her mother called him a stalker or not. If you take each event where she saw this man, anyone could call it a conicidence. However, if you take the sightings collectively, then one might call it stalking.
1. McKinley's
mother told KWTV that Martin had followed her daughter around at a rodeo about two years ago.
2.
She also said McKinley recently bumped into Martin at a convenience store and on Thursday night he showed up at her door, introducing himself as a neighbor.
3. McKinley
told her mother she did not know who he was until she pieced it all together after the shooting.
The statements above all come from the MOTHER, not Sarah. So how is it that Sarah is a liar?
In this article, she again doesn't mention stalking. The reporter does. Is he putting words in her mouth?
http://lybio.net/sarah-mckinley-okl...into-her-home-while-on-phone-with-911/people/
Regardless, this woman did the right things. She called 911, she barricaded her door, she kept quiet as to not give away her location in the house. She even put a bottle in her 16 week old baby's mouth so they wouldn't hear where the baby was.
The perp knocked the door down with enough force to push the couch away from the door. He had a 12" hunting knife in his gloved hand. He was in her house with a knife, and she shot him justifliably.
So calling him a stalker, an acquantiance, a follower, a friend, or whatever label she chooses is is irrelevent to me.
And from what I gather from reading many links,
Ms McKinley said she didn’t know who he was until after the shooting, when she pieced everything together.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...looking-prescription-drugs.html#ixzz1jMrXqEqV
MOO
Mel