beesy
myspace.com/beesy_boo
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 1,814
- Reaction score
- 21
What do you mean, your pics? You took those photos? I can't draw a map. Why should I draw a map? Isn't that the joke when somebody is acting thick headed? Should I draw you a picture?G.I.RattlesnakeJane said:Look I'm keeping score here, don't kid yourselves, so far goody and beesy have the most convincing arguments. They have scored more points in the way of blood evidence. Remember my posts about velocity. I know you know what it means. My pics of the crime scene are in MTJD. Could you draw a map like they showed on the site showing this cast off pattern. I read the site very thoughly.
I also saw where cast off is often obscured by additional bleeding by victims just what happened in this case. What are the size of these drops cause the site gave real specific measurements and I use a mm ruler everyday. The tiny spot on the back of Darlie's shirt looks like it could have been aspiration too. Was her back to him ? I am looking really hard at all the blood but really don't know how to make it tell it's story.
From MTJD, I see one was 1/16 of an inch and one was 3/8 of inch. I would have to check the trial transcripts to confirm that. This is the cast-off in Damon's blood I'm talking about. Why does it matter if you use a mm ruler everyday? You didn't measure this blood. That one teeny dot of Devon's is not an issue. Chris actually accuses LE of planting it! It wasn't even a focus at the trial so why would they plant it? I think they'd plant a bigger spot if they were going to plant anything. Of course spatter can be obscured. These weren't though. So why does that matter?
You are doing a great disservice to yourself if you are only looking at MTJD and the evidence listed on Darlie's site. Have you read any of the transcripts? Have you listened to the 911 tape? I haven't listened to it in awhile because I actually started feeling sick when I did :sick: I used to be able to quote it though. What about the autopsy reports? What you should do is check behind anything from MTJD or the evidence on the site. You will then understand what we mean when we say they use smoke and mirrors. They simply state something without qualifying it. They say "these fingerprints are unidentified" They do not say why they are though. They are smudged and cannot even be run through the data base. They leave that part out.
