[/b][/color]
No. He is referring to a low blood count, I think. I have forgotten what terms he used, but it is all related to the old argument about whether she lost enough blood to go into shock. People who think she is guilty don't want to admit she lost a lot of blood and those who think she is innocent want to exaggerate how much she lost. DiMaio kind of puts the issue to rest. She did lose a lot of blood. She was not near bleeding out though as supporters usually want us to believe. She showed no sign of being in shock but by the next day her body reflected the loss in whatever tests he was referring to. Still not enough to make her go into shock though. He used it to show that there was significant blood loss, but I read it as proof she was never in shock....her body immediately compensated as our bodies do in a crisis. No shock, no loss of alertness....she knew exactly what was going on around her and could have sat down next to Damon if she had a mind to. She just didn't have a mind to, pure and simple. No dizziness either. More BS on that front. If she was dizzy, it was not until the next day.
.