One of the articles that I read about the search for the blue barrel said that Drew P bought the barrel with chlorine recently. Obviously Drew P will say that is where the plastic in his vehicle came from.
Okay, think about this one. Drew P. said that he found Stacy's car at Clow airport and we all figured that that was a diversion. Searches and dives did not find a body in the area. Drew P said she went to Jamaica, we all figure that too is a diversion to get LE looking to Jamaica.
Drew P brings home a blue barrel and it is now missing. Bits of plastic are found in his vehicle. A neighbor saw Drew P and unknown man carrying a blue barrel out of the home (if they were carrying a dead body in a barrel, wouldn't you think they would check to see if anyone was outside?) What if this too is a diversion meant to get LE to looking for a blue barrel and in the water?
I keep thinking about the neighbors saying that there was a hit on the car by the cadaver dogs and allegedly Drew P tried to put the car elsewhere during the search warrant. But there are no reports of hits on the SUV and no reports of trying to hide the vehicle. What if the barrel was taken one way in the Denauli, and Stacy's body was taken a different way in the car? For instance what if Drew P took the barrel and disposed of it, and the other man took the body and disposed of it? Or vice versa.
Maybe the reason that Drew P seems so arrogant and confident is that he knows that LE is following a false trail? The reason I am thinking of that is that IMO, the only thing worse than finding no evidence would be to find too much evidence and all of it pointing to different directions.
Also, I wonder if the neighbor who saw the man with DrewP noticed a strange car in the neighborhood? Did he park at the airport and walk to DrewP's house, and when they got back from where ever they did the disposals, the other man parked the car he was driving in the airport lot and picked up his own. DrewP then walked back to the airport and picked it up.
Does this make sense or is it only the ramblings of a tired mind, lol?
I understand what you're saying.

But, just from the way DP has acted, I don't think he planned it. I think he killed Stacy in a rage over something. Then, he had to think of a way to dispose of the body quickly. I don't think he had time to think of any diversions. He disposed of her body, and then came up with the "she ran off with another man" statement. If he had planned it, I don't think he would have planned on killing her in the house, especially with the children present in the house......he would have thought of a way to get Stacy to go with him somewhere, or meet him somewhere.
Since the beginning, DP has been very transparent in his actions, and I have the feeling that he's making it up as he goes along - not that he had planned it. The letter he supposedly received from a tipster is one such transparent thing. A genuine tipster would be calling LE with their "sighting" of Stacy in the Kroger store in Peoria, not sending DP a letter.
What we've seen of DP, we know he's a very bad actor and not good at planning. He had time - a couple of days to prepare for the interview on the Today show. He's a policeman and should know how people react to bad news about a loved one. Yet, he couldn't even muster up some fake tears or fake emotion. Instead of going on that program and crying and pleading with Stacy to return to her family and saying how sad and upset her children are without mommy, it was all about him. He couldn't even act like a grieving, jilted, spouse.
When it came to the exhuming of KS body and the second autopsy, he attacked the findings of a medical examiner, instead of acting surprised at hearing that his ex-wife's death was a homicide. DP isn't good at planning things to make people think he's not guilty of wrong-doing.
I'm just not sure if DP is smart enough to think in terms of planning a diversion.