The British Royal Family #3

[Luna20]

Hollywood executive SNUBS Duchess - ‘Meghan needs Disney more than Disney needs Meghan'

“She’s a controversial figure”

That’s an understatement.

 

[Luna20]

It's Meghan Marvel: Duchess of Sussex tells her agent to find her a role as a Hollywood superhero | Daily Mail Online

~Finding Yoko~

 

[rosemadderlake]

^^ imo... That’s unfair to Yoko who was loved deeply by John, and who suffered the most tragic of losses along with the whole world. And she has kept singularly vigilant of his memory ever since that unspeakable day in 1980.

Paul McCartney has shed a lot of light on the breakup of The Beatles all of whom went on to create some of their best, most iconic works as individuals.

That line of thinking though illustrates the real fear for those with high profiles. Especially here in the U.S.

 

[Oregonmama]

How Beatrice the Contessa is marrying into a family much posher than her own | Daily Mail Online

 

[gregjrichards]

The Queen looks elegant in turquoise as she rides alone to church

The Queen looks elegant in turquoise as she rides alone to Windsor church service | Daily Mail Online

 

[weepingangel]

She’s so lovely
The sunglasses and that lip color

View attachment 235451

The Queen looks elegant in turquoise as she rides alone to church

The Queen looks elegant in turquoise as she rides alone to Windsor church service | Daily Mail Online

 

[gregjrichards]

Palace confirms Duchess of Cornwall still 'intends' to pass over title of Queen for Princess Consort when Prince Charles ascends the throne

Duchess of Cornwall still to be known as 'Princess' not 'Queen' when Charles is crowned | Daily Mail Online

 

[Luna20]

^^ imo... That’s unfair to Yoko who was loved deeply by John, and who suffered the most tragic of losses along with the whole world. And she has kept singularly vigilant of his memory ever since that unspeakable day in 1980.

Paul McCartney has shed a lot of light on the breakup of The Beatles all of whom went on to create some of their best, most iconic works as individuals.

That line of thinking though illustrates the real fear for those with high profiles. Especially here in the U.S.

Hey Rose thanks for noticing, it was supposed to be Nemo. I have seen a few Yoko comments and references expressed elsewhere regarding dissolving the ‘the brotherhood’. Apparently it was still in my thoughts!

 

[astheworldfallsdown]

View attachment 235451

The Queen looks elegant in turquoise as she rides alone to church

The Queen looks elegant in turquoise as she rides alone to Windsor church service | Daily Mail Online

She looks amazing, those bright colours really suit her.

 

[astheworldfallsdown]

View attachment 235456

Palace confirms Duchess of Cornwall still 'intends' to pass over title of Queen for Princess Consort when Prince Charles ascends the throne

Duchess of Cornwall still to be known as 'Princess' not 'Queen' when Charles is crowned | Daily Mail Online

I'm a little disappointed in this, I'd love there to be a King and Queen, will have to wait for Wills and Kate I suppose.

 

[Betty P]

TALK OF THE TOWN: Humble Princess Anne shows 'call me Harry' what being ordinary really means | Daily Mail Online

Princess Anne is a class act.

Yes, quite a contrast there. Princess Anne walks the walk, taking the subway while "call me Harry" takes a private rail car to give a speech.

 

[ktm44]

It's interesting that tabloids never reveail their sources and over time, fairy tales become fact. Employees who had agreed to work for a specific time, ended their tenure and fact was established that she was hard to work for. There was no room for the young couple at Kensington Palace, yet tabloid fact became an ugly war between two wives, when that fell apart, it became a battle between brothers.

At one time, tabloid facts were that they were not hard enough working royals, deserved no privacy and needed to step down. When they gave the tabloids what they wanted, the tabloid fact seems to be that they disrespecting the queen and should get back to work as senior royals, even if that means ruining every employment opportunity they may have.

Tabloid fact seems to have forgotten that Prince William and his wife, copyrighted their brand to prevent others from capitalizing or embarrasment but when the Sussexes did the same, they were villified.

We have nothing but tabloid fact on their statement regarding the use of Royal, which may have been nothing more than their decision to rebrand but tabloids have spun that into factual disrespect for the queen.

Tabloid facts currently seem to focus on security, which is beneficial to them and if they can shame the royal family into removing their security, they can destroy Princess Diana's son's life, just as they did hers. I wonder at what point they'll be satisfied. Will they be content just to force him back to working as a senior royal or would it be better for them if they destroy his marriage or cost him the life of his wife or son?

 

[rosemadderlake]

Hey Rose thanks for noticing, it was supposed to be Nemo. I have seen a few Yoko comments and references expressed elsewhere regarding dissolving the ‘the brotherhood’. Apparently it was still in my thoughts!

I’ve seen some Yoko comparisons, too.

And she was controversial for some time, too.

I didn’t mean to lecture, in my reaction I find myself protective of her.

 

[HongKongPhooey]

Hey Rose thanks for noticing, it was supposed to be Nemo. I have seen a few Yoko comments and references expressed elsewhere regarding dissolving the ‘the brotherhood’. Apparently it was still in my thoughts!

Hi, how does Finding Nemo relate to MM? I'm confused

 

[Deleted member 158085]

It's interesting that tabloids never reveail their sources and over time, fairy tales become fact. Employees who had agreed to work for a specific time, ended their tenure and fact was established that she was hard to work for. There was no room for the young couple at Kensington Palace, yet tabloid fact became an ugly war between two wives, when that fell apart, it became a battle between brothers.

At one time, tabloid facts were that they were not hard enough working royals, deserved no privacy and needed to step down. When they gave the tabloids what they wanted, the tabloid fact seems to be that they disrespecting the queen and should get back to work as senior royals, even if that means ruining every employment opportunity they may have.

Tabloid fact seems to have forgotten that Prince William and his wife, copyrighted their brand to prevent others from capitalizing or embarrasment but when the Sussexes did the same, they were villified.

We have nothing but tabloid fact on their statement regarding the use of Royal, which may have been nothing more than their decision to rebrand but tabloids have spun that into factual disrespect for the queen.

Tabloid facts currently seem to focus on security, which is beneficial to them and if they can shame the royal family into removing their security, they can destroy Princess Diana's son's life, just as they did hers. I wonder at what point they'll be satisfied. Will they be content just to force him back to working as a senior royal or would it be better for them if they destroy his marriage or cost him the life of his wife or son?

Standing ovation from me.

 

[firebird]

It's interesting that tabloids never reveail their sources and over time, fairy tales become fact. Employees who had agreed to work for a specific time, ended their tenure and fact was established that she was hard to work for. There was no room for the young couple at Kensington Palace, yet tabloid fact became an ugly war between two wives, when that fell apart, it became a battle between brothers.

At one time, tabloid facts were that they were not hard enough working royals, deserved no privacy and needed to step down. When they gave the tabloids what they wanted, the tabloid fact seems to be that they disrespecting the queen and should get back to work as senior royals, even if that means ruining every employment opportunity they may have.

Tabloid fact seems to have forgotten that Prince William and his wife, copyrighted their brand to prevent others from capitalizing or embarrasment but when the Sussexes did the same, they were villified.

We have nothing but tabloid fact on their statement regarding the use of Royal, which may have been nothing more than their decision to rebrand but tabloids have spun that into factual disrespect for the queen.

Tabloid facts currently seem to focus on security, which is beneficial to them and if they can shame the royal family into removing their security, they can destroy Princess Diana's son's life, just as they did hers. I wonder at what point they'll be satisfied. Will they be content just to force him back to working as a senior royal or would it be better for them if they destroy his marriage or cost him the life of his wife or son?

If I could find my tiny violin, I would play it for them unceasingly.

 

[astheworldfallsdown]

It's interesting that tabloids never reveail their sources and over time, fairy tales become fact. Employees who had agreed to work for a specific time, ended their tenure and fact was established that she was hard to work for. There was no room for the young couple at Kensington Palace, yet tabloid fact became an ugly war between two wives, when that fell apart, it became a battle between brothers.

At one time, tabloid facts were that they were not hard enough working royals, deserved no privacy and needed to step down. When they gave the tabloids what they wanted, the tabloid fact seems to be that they disrespecting the queen and should get back to work as senior royals, even if that means ruining every employment opportunity they may have.

Tabloid fact seems to have forgotten that Prince William and his wife, copyrighted their brand to prevent others from capitalizing or embarrasment but when the Sussexes did the same, they were villified.

We have nothing but tabloid fact on their statement regarding the use of Royal, which may have been nothing more than their decision to rebrand but tabloids have spun that into factual disrespect for the queen.

Tabloid facts currently seem to focus on security, which is beneficial to them and if they can shame the royal family into removing their security, they can destroy Princess Diana's son's life, just as they did hers. I wonder at what point they'll be satisfied. Will they be content just to force him back to working as a senior royal or would it be better for them if they destroy his marriage or cost him the life of his wife or son?

I wish I could like this post a hundred times over.

 

[astheworldfallsdown]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reveal their plan for March is to stay positive on social media

Good to see they're not letting the haters get them down.

 

[Oregonmama]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reveal their plan for March is to stay positive on social media

Good to see they're not letting the haters get them down.

Looks like they finally realize they made huge mistakes and drama with their prior SM postings and rants re retreating from the RF.

 

[firebird]

Looks like they finally realize they made huge mistakes and drama with their prior SM postings and rants re retreating from the RF.

nah...this is a "thing" they've been doing for a while. Each month they follow one "good news" site on insta. And that's the only site they follow for that entire month. Then they change it. The current one is just a really cheesy (imo) good news "consolidator."