- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,395
- Reaction score
- 6,417
I don’t know about Britain but in the USA there are an inordinate number of celebrity gossip news shows. TMZ must have camping rights at LAX.
That's very interesting, and explains, for eg, the National Enquirer. But IMO no one takes the NE seriously, or look to it for actual 'news' the way they do the British tabloids.All of them, potentially. In the US, they can, and do, largely get away with pretty much any nonsense due to extremely broad (overbroad, if you ask me) 1st Amendment protection. Here's a snip from an article about the difference between US and UK libel law:
"I did not live in England, I do not live in England, the book was not published there, so why not come and sue me in the United States?" she asks.
The reason is simple.
"English laws are much more favorable for someone looking to protect their reputation," says Jenny Afia, a lawyer in London who often represents people making libel and privacy claims.
Ehrenfeld's case was an example of "libel tourism," where someone brings a libel claim in a country where he is most likely to win. Often, that country is Great Britain.
"Crooks and brigands from around the world come here to launder their reputations, where they couldn't get exculpation in either their home country or indeed in the United States of America," says Mark Stephens, a London lawyer who often represents media companies in these cases.
In American courts, the burden of proof rests with the person who brings a claim of libel. In British courts, the author or journalist has the burden of proof, and typically loses.
"So you've got the rich and powerful shutting down and chilling speech which is critical of them," says Stephens.
On Libel And The Law, U.S. And U.K. Go Separate Ways
![]()
Kate Middleton wears £395 LK Bennett dress at Teen Heroes reception | Daily Mail Online
The Cambridges today. Wouldn't have thought brown would be so nice on Kate but it really suits her, like the cut of the dress too
Meghan Markle arrives for first public appearance since ITV documentary as she attends Royal Albert Hall – without Prince Harry – just hours after source close to the couple told how they have 'single-handedly modernised the monarchy'
Meghan Markle arrives for first public appearance since ITV documentary at Royal Albert Hall | Daily Mail Online
View attachment 210488 View attachment 210489
that is one of the few dresses I like on her. That is a great color on her
This is FASCINATING !Prince Charles seems to have gone without Camilla but theres lots of photos of the other European royals in fabulous tiaras (the ettiquette seems to have been long gowns and hats during the day which I think looks rather odd) in Japan for their new Emperor to be enthroned. I think Maxima's evening look is my favourite
See Japanese Emperor Naruhito's Enthronement Ceremony in Photos
Which US press sources are worse than the UK tabloids?
That's very interesting, and explains, for eg, the National Enquirer. But IMO no one takes the NE seriously, or look to it for actual 'news' the way they do the British tabloids.
IMO, while they could potentially be scandal sheets, the news media in the US choose to be much more reticent and respectful about people's personal lives. That includes TMZ, who will try to be first to verify facts, but doesn't invent or feed elaborate soap opera stories like palace feuds. The last story they had about MM was when she and Harry took a private jet in September.
The US press have, for example, been very respectful of Trump's family, however much they criticize him. Melania complains about being 'bullied' for what is really very mild commentary compared with what MM has faced.
TMZ did all the stories in her father. Now today it seems the National Enquire has decided to join the fray.
Duchess Meghan Markle hits Prince Harry With Booze Ban to Conceive
Yes, I think that’s pretty accurate. Plus, they came down hard with some laws on photographing children without permission. They cannot show their identity.
Still, TMZ will follow, film people being followed even if they have no comment that day... so, there’s an in one’s face aspect.
Daily Mail has a whole U.S. branch. I’m often impressed at their regular reporting, they are there faster with the story than many U.S. papers.
There are some second and third city papers like the NY Post which has a dishy section.
FLOTUS, both recent First Ladies have gotten raked over the coals. You name it, they’ve said it. In fact, Meghan could get some good guidance by watching both First Ladies, their interviews, responses, as to how they handle the brutal press and SM world they endure pretty regularly. —FLOTUS definitely lives in a fish bowl while in the WH.
If I were to define bullying on SM, I’d have to say twitter is where so much happens. In fact I read that Meghan’s sister got banned from twitter.
I'm certainly under the impression that the US press make stuff up. I'm not saying the UK press don't, but l think generally there is some element of truth in it.
I'm a bit surprised Meghan is out and about at all given his awful life is for her at the moment. If l had caused such a fracas l would want to hide for a few weeks![]()
What Happens When Celebrities Speak Out About mental illness.
More individuals in the spotlight—be it professional athletes, authors, musicians or social influencers—are opening up and disclosing their mental illnesses and experiences with seeking treatment.
We’ve learned that one of the most effective anti-stigma agents is a face-to-face experience with a person’s story of lived experience. And face-to-face is now in the palm of your hand, and accessible at any time.
What Happens When Celebrities Speak Out | NAMI: National Alliance on Mental Illness
Yes, I think that’s pretty accurate. Plus, they came down hard with some laws on photographing children without permission. They cannot show their identity.
Still, TMZ will follow, film people being followed even if they have no comment that day... so, there’s an in one’s face aspect.
Daily Mail has a whole U.S. branch. I’m often impressed at their regular reporting, they are there faster with the story than many U.S. papers.
There are some second and third city papers like the NY Post which has a dishy section.
FLOTUS, both recent First Ladies have gotten raked over the coals. You name it, they’ve said it. In fact, Meghan could get some good guidance by watching both First Ladies, their interviews, responses, as to how they handle the brutal press and SM world they endure pretty regularly. —FLOTUS definitely lives in a fish bowl while in the WH.
If I were to define bullying on SM, I’d have to say twitter is where so much happens. In fact I read that Meghan’s sister got banned from twitter.