The British Royal Family - news, views, clothes & shoes! #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #641
B9353792-B7FA-4C8D-951B-83D4DA503800.jpeg

Victoria Beckham is reportedly helping Meghan Markle spruce up her new home at Frogmore Cottage after she moved in with Prince Harry.

The former actress, 37, is said to have spoken to Victoria, 44, about interior design of the Grade II-listed building which sits on the Frogmore Estate in Windsor.

And the expectant mother has also moved posters and artwork to the cottage from her former apartment in Toronto to make it as 'homely as possible', a source told the Mirror.

Victoria Beckham 'is helping Meghan spruce up her new home' | Daily Mail Online
 
  • #642
IMO there is nothing wrong with Meghan. If the papers said wonderful things like they did at the Wedding time their papers wouldn't sell now. They did the same to Kate. No matter what choice Meghan makes the press is always going to give it a negative slant.
 
  • #643
IMO there is nothing wrong with Meghan. If the papers said wonderful things like they did at the Wedding time their papers wouldn't sell now. They did the same to Kate. No matter what choice Meghan makes the press is always going to give it a negative slant.

The Daily Mail have a Middleton family hit piece with “disgruntled former employees” slamming Mrs. Middleton. It is disgraceful and nobody’s business. I’m sick of the attacks on both Duchess’s.
 
  • #644
deleted since the article had already been posted....
 
Last edited:
  • #645
The Daily Mail have a Middleton family hit piece with “disgruntled former employees” slamming Mrs. Middleton. It is disgraceful and nobody’s business. I’m sick of the attacks on both Duchess’s.
Me too. In the beginning they can do no wrong. As time goes on everything Meghan as the new kid on the block does is wrong. So classy going after Mrs. Middleton Grrrrrrrrrr..................I'm sure Meghan and Harry have a bit more freedom of choice than Kate and William have or ever will have.
 
  • #646
Gosh how refreshing it would be if we had a report on all of the day to day charity work Meghan/Harry and all the Royals did. Every outfit worn every day or to every event that day. Not just the less flattering?
 
  • #647
IMO when the baby is born it will be sugar and spice and everything nice. Briefly.
 
  • #648
IMO when the baby is born it will be sugar and spice and everything nice. Briefly.

I hope so and I also hope they don’t start condemning them for baby gifts they have received and how much they cost. And if the baby has ginger hair.
 
  • #649
I hope so and I also hope they don’t start condemning them for baby gifts they have received and how much they cost. And if the baby has ginger hair.
Me too. Well if the baby is a ginger the rags likely wont run with it being an alien baby LOL
 
  • #650
  • #651
58D8B02C-1086-4DD2-BDFD-CC2D540ACDD7.jpeg

I wish the press would let Princess Diana Rest In Peace and remember her for the wonderful Lady she was. Going over her death won’t bring her back. (No criticism or offence meant to you Gardenista)

My favourite photo of Princess Diana is above.
 
  • #652
  • #653
Meghan's mum is flying over from LA to be by her side as she prepares to have her first child.

But sources say yoga teacher Doria Ragland, 62, can’t stretch out her stay – as she has to go home to look after her dogs.

Meghan Markle's mum Doria to fly over and be by daughter's side for baby arrival

IIRC, it was reported earlier that Doria was going to be staying with Meghan and Harry for an extended period of time and that the couple would not be having a traditional nanny like most of the royals. What happened to the initial plans?
 
  • #654
IMO there is nothing wrong with Meghan. If the papers said wonderful things like they did at the Wedding time their papers wouldn't sell now. They did the same to Kate. No matter what choice Meghan makes the press is always going to give it a negative slant.

Do you think they're making up those quotes? Not saying they wouldn't or couldn't, but I thought the BRF usually goes after reporters when they report false, negative stories. If not, it's a shame if Daily Mail is deliberately printing false information.
 
  • #655
Do you think they're making up those quotes? Not saying they wouldn't or couldn't, but I thought the BRF usually goes after reporters when they report false, negative stories. If not, it's a shame if Daily Mail is deliberately printing false information.
It must be true or we will find out soon enough when Meghan gives birth in the Lindo Wing with the royals’ experts by her bedside.

The renovations to Frogmore Cottage cost two to three million and the cottage and repairs were freely offered to them. Harry and Meghan incurred no obligation.
 
  • #656
It must be true or we will find out soon enough when Meghan gives birth in the Lindo Wing with the royals’ experts by her bedside.

The renovations to Frogmore Cottage cost two to three million and the cottage and repairs were freely offered to them. Harry and Meghan incurred no obligation.

Yes, I agree. The Queen has been very kind and generous to Harry and Meghan. I hope Meghan is appreciative of the generosity and kindness shown to her so far. I do indeed hope these reports of her using harsh and condescending language towards the Queen are false, that she's really not using such a bad tone when discussing the Queen's choice of her own doctors. There's no call for that and hopefully, its a case of erroneous news media reporting.
 
  • #657
Posts removed and bumping in case anyone missed Tricia's post earlier in the thread:

Hey Everyone,

Come on now. Let's leave the conspiracies to black helicopters and the Illuminati.

THERE IS NOTHING TO EVEN SLIGHTLY HINT MEGHAN IS NOT ACTUALLY PREGNANT.

To me, her face as really filled out. I know that feeling. Like a bloated oat.

We are pretty easy going on this discussion but I do have to draw the line on this theory.

Thank you in advance for understanding.
Tricia
 
  • #658
I think I'm starting to understand now what Meghan is working on. I don't usually follow celebrities on social media, but happened to read an article recently about Beyonce negotiating some advertising deal with Adidas or somesuch. They don't call them advertising or marketing deals these days, but refer to them as "branding". Pretty much the same thing, though.

Anyway, it looks like the template for these celebrity business plans involves gaining (through various methods) large numbers of followers on twitter, instagram, etc. then use that "following" as leverage to promote the celebrity's "style" or "brand" ie a logo or color graphic design, web site and a couple of specially designed shirts, , tennis shoes, travel mug, etc that are sort of designed around this "brand".

It brings to mind, for example, the "pink ribbon" cause marketing campaigns used to promote "breast cancer awareness" when every big charity had their own special pink ribbon design and logo and used it to raise money and sell some nick-nacks with their pink ribbon "brand". You hired a graphic designer and marketing firm that put your unique cause ribbon design together and promoted it. There were teams of consultants who specialized in doing just this.

The celebrities today are doing the same thing, only for profit. They negotiate deals with big companies to market their products using the celebrity's "brand" via their big social media accounts. They mix lifestyle advice, personal "insights" into their private lives, etc. all while getting you to buy their latest CD, tshirt, tennis shoes, make-up line, whatever. It serves the celebrity several ways: 1) enhances sales of their entertainment product, whether music or the latest movie or tv show; 2) it makes them a tidy profit on selling merch or getting big promotional contracts with retailers or manufacturers and 3) it's a great vanity project to boost their ego and get their name in the news and around social media. It expands their fan base, helps their entertainment career, etc.

I suppose this is what MM and Harry are doing, because it appears so similar to the bit of Beyonce "branding" and marketing/messaging that I saw online. Same business/PR template. Of course Meghan and Harry technically can't profit from any ventures, but there are doubtless many other perks available to them. If they follow the typical brand/cause marketing template as other celebs, we can expect them to use their child as part of this campaign.

Intersting, but not original. It's a tried and true business plan that has just been updated to accommodate social media. That's why MM wanted separate PR office, staff, etc. Everything has to be tailored to MM and PH's brand. There's no room for other members of the royal family.

Yes, it's branding and the latest term "influencer". Meghan and Harry developing their own branding. Regardless of what fans of Meghan say, she is not an influencer. She wears designer clothing, but she doesn't have a style of her own and therefore doesn't have a "brand" like other celebrities who dress in a manner that other women are inspired by.

I hope that when their baby is born she focuses less on being in the spotlight.
 
  • #659
Yes, it's branding and the latest term "influencer". Meghan and Harry developing their own branding. Regardless of what fans of Meghan say, she is not an influencer. She wears designer clothing, but she doesn't have a style of her own and therefore doesn't have a "brand" like other celebrities who dress in a manner that other women are inspired by.

I hope that when their baby is born she focuses less on being in the spotlight.

She is in the spotlight because she exists
 
  • #660
The Mirror reported earlier today how a charity was left stunned after gaining the royal nod on social media.

The Little Village charity that collects good quality clothes, toys and kit for kids aged under five for families in need was left "completely astounded" when it was mentioned by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 's new Instagram account.

After the royal mention, Little Village's Instagram followers shot up by 1,000 in just 24 hours after the post by the pregnant couple's account.

Meghan Markle's mum Doria to fly over and be by daughter's side for baby arrival


^^ From the same link that gregjrichards posted.

Think this is where Harry and Meghan are very aware they can be a force for good. This little charity is big news, now.

They are unique in that they represent two countries. And when they find their way, get their footing, find their collective identity, I think they’ll be great. They have more freedom than Will and Kate.

-Harry and Will, and with Kate have started some important campaigns, most recently opening up about the profound grief for Princess Di, their struggles, and the importance of mental health awareness, and care.

America is in love with the royal family. Yeah, I love all the pomp and circumstance, and fashion, but I’m seeing these two young princes come into their own in a very modern age. And it’s exciting. And their causes, their voices carry weight. Harry and Meghan’s Instagram allows them their own narrative. It’s the best publicity because it is their own.

The BRF is special in that it transcends leaders, and the tides that affect other countries. That’s a burden on the figureheads, but also a gift.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,370
Total visitors
2,504

Forum statistics

Threads
633,168
Messages
18,636,792
Members
243,429
Latest member
LJPrett
Back
Top