- Joined
- Jul 14, 2015
- Messages
- 6,187
- Reaction score
- 31,184
Princess Ann didn't request royal titles for her children and they all seem to be ok with it. They're all doing very well, in fact.
If PH wants it, I'm sure the Queen will give the baby an appropriate royal title. Lady or Viscount would be nice.
Titles usually come from the father. In Princess Margaret's case her husband was given the title of Earl Snowdon, and an additional title of Viscount Linley. When their first son, David, was born, he was given the Viscount Linley title. Now the first Earl Snowdon is dead, David is Earl Snowdon and his eldest son is Viscount Linley.
In Prince Edward's case, he's not only a prince but also has an earldom, so his eldest son got that earldom.
In Princess Anne's case, her first husband didn't take a title....so there would have been no title for her son/daughter to inherit.
Prince Harry has an earldom, which is has been suggested is the most likely title to be given to his eldest son. And just like the daughters in the cases of Princess Margaret and Prince Edward, a daughter would be styled as a 'Lady'.
The Queen intervened to make Prince William's younger children prince/princess, and that seems fair as it would have been weird for the children to have the eldest a prince and the other two earl and lady, plus when they're older they'll be the three children of the King and would surely all be elevated to prince and princess at that time?
So I think the question might be whether Harry's children would be elevated to prince/princess when Charles takes the throne, in which case it wouldn't be so much of an intervention to give Baby Sussex that title early, as with Charlotte and Louis. But if they'd never become prince/princess then the Queen might not see any 'raising' of the titles as being appropriate and then the most likely is that a son of Harry would become an earl, and a daughter styled as lady.