- Joined
- Jul 14, 2015
- Messages
- 6,187
- Reaction score
- 31,184
Really? Sounds good on paper, but how do they make tht work when everyone has a phone with camera nowadays...
I think you're right, it does sound good on paper. I think anyone should have a right to walk around without paps following them to the point of harassment.
An individual with a phone camera first has to recognise the famous person, and then unless they're very close they won't get a great or detailed shot. If they're closer, then they can ask if it's okay. I think there's a big difference between that and a bunch of guys with 700mm primes.
I also think if someone lives in a gilded cage, it's still a cage. Imagine staying inside and worrying about telephoto lenses looking through the windows...or going out into the garden with the kid and a paddling pool in summer and he pulls his swimshorts down and pees into a pool and there's a photographer up a tree taking a shot over a 6' wall? And having people saying, "well don't go outside, cos the paps have every right to be there". I think all that sounds like a nightmare...and it's one of the reasons why I don't find being "Royal" to be a pure blessing or, for me, even a particularly desirable position.