The British Royal Family

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
Diana certainly had her struggles but she overcame them. Such a tragic ending. She would have gone on to do so much good.

I agree, @Bravo. She really was coming into her own. Just as I remember where I was when I heard about JFK’s assassination, I remember where I was when I heard the news about Diana. It was the same kick in the stomach.
JMO
 
  • #482
DBM. Duplicate.
 
  • #483
On what basis, perception or just flying or I’m asking: quantum universe of grace from God or possibilities or just flying by the ephemeral perception/supposition of known quantum theory? FACTS can someone please give citations?

LOL I love your posts @Tony1902! :D
 
  • #484
Do you guys think the person taking the video was up in a tree?
 
  • #485
I LOVE the fact that Diana wasn’t skinny and frail looking like most of the others. She looked healthy and strong.
JMO
Exactly what I was thinking - thin was certainly in back in the 90’s IMO - most look frail to me
I miss her even though I never knew her except through the media
 
  • #486
Don't worry. I'll be critical for both of us :D


Speaking for myself, I didn't say said she shouldn't have lived her life as she did. I'm just judging her based on it. I guess I'm proudly above our crass pop culture. Imo, that video wasn't goofy. It was cheesecake one nip slip away from softcore. jmo

Just thinking off your post, firebird.

I think the Hollywood piece is what is perceived as very shallow and superficial.

And racy, and loose, flighty, cutthroat, and whatever other adjectives.

Her part on suits was the equalivent of a nighttime soap. Fluffy, sexed up entertainment.

Therefore, some feel this ‘American woman L.A. Hollywood’ archetype is not good enough for Harry? And that’s a class issue?

But maybe Harry likes it! Lol!

I have a hunch that H&M decided that they’d give the BRF an earnest try. And, if it wasn’t working they’d make a change.

The press has been really disappointing in that Meghan just became fodder for a media frenzy. And things like the constant comparisons, between Kate and Meghan as if it’s a constant competition, had a permanent high school level mean girls shade to it.

Truth is Meghan and Kate are grown up women. Truth is they had very different upbringings. And, they have very different roles in the RF.

It was nice to see pics of them both today, one in full out glam, and the other perhaps trying to soak in being a Mom for the fist time.

One thing I observe about the Queen, maybe it’s the British is their sense of good timing. Get something established quickly, give it until spring to get it together, review it in a year. That’s so sensible.

I think QE is well aware of the horror show that the press relationship with the BRF is, was, and can be. But she couldn’t make the decision for Harry.

—all jmo
 
  • #487
  • #488
  • #489
  • #490
  • #491
Exactly what I was thinking - thin was certainly in back in the 90’s IMO - most look frail to me
I miss her even though I never knew her except through the media

I think this is part of what made Diana seem "real" and "down to earth."
 
  • #492
Anybody have an idea appx how much $$$ the newest MM photos are worth?

I think there are different answers to that question. The person who took them would make money, but they're possibly working for someone else, so that other person (maybe the editor of a big newspaper) would make the bulk of the money. Or it might be someone working independently and they'll sell to the highest bidder...again that means that both the photographer and the organization they sell to can make a lot of money on fees.
 
  • #493
Do you guys think the person taking the video was up in a tree?

I’m inclined to think her gal pal was with her, taking them.
It’d be risky for MM to carry Archie & walk two dogs. If one caught a scent & pulled her, she would be in trouble.
Her bodyguards behind her would be of little help if either dog bolted.
In one photo it looked like the large dog found a place to take care of his biz, if paparazzi had that photo op’, I think they would have published it.
MM is smiling in such way it appears to me that it was a planned photo op.
 
  • #494
I’m inclined to think her gal pal was with her, taking them.
It’d be risky for MM to carry Archie & walk two dogs. If one caught a scent & pulled her, she would be in trouble.
Her bodyguards behind her would be of little help if either dog bolted.
In one photo it looked like the large dog found a place to take care of his biz, if paparazzi had that photo op’, I think they would have published it.
MM is smiling in such way it appears to me that it was a planned photo op.

That makes lots of sense. Thinking it through further, there also would be tons more footage if it was a regular pap.
 
  • #495
  • #496
The photo credit is splash news backgrid
Palace advisor says it would be 'unsatisfactory' if Harry uses 'Sussex Royal' brand | Daily Mail Online

I need to check their website again to see what has changed if anything
ETA - not sure who took the photo of her the dogs and the baby(I think he will be tall - look at those long legs hanging from the carrier) I will checkout this splash news photo credit in the meantime
 
  • #497
  • #498
  • #499
  • #500
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
1,234
Total visitors
1,308

Forum statistics

Threads
632,421
Messages
18,626,343
Members
243,148
Latest member
ayuuuiiix
Back
Top