The Last Happy Hour, book by Charles Joseph Hackett

[truthspider]

I have a question for anyone who thinks it was CPH. Do you think he was involved with JB or do you think he just happened to find her running around the neighborhood? Is there any evidence that JB and CPH are friends?

The number of possible scenarios as to how those 2 met is infinite, we as the public just don't know. It would be pure speculation to say exactly how, when, if they met. We do know JB has not spoken to the media about the so called drifter, we know the police are not being open with the public because it could ruin the investigation and we (think) we know that JB took a ride within the community and then SG started "acting weird" which I believe to mean she was drugged. More importantly, we know CPH has told various versions of his side of the story of May 1, and lied about calling MG. Whereas JB has done what the police told him to do: not talk to the media. For some odd reason, even though LE asked CPH not to talk to the media, he kept doing it, and kept doing it, and wrote signed letters....

Knowing how and when and if JB and CPH met doesn't impact our ability to deduce who the guilty party is in SG's death. We know enough about both people, and the events surrounding May 1 to deduce who is the guilty party. If we have multiple witnesses who say that CPH told them he administered SG a sedative, then it really doesn't matter that CPH tells us he didn't, and he doesn't know JB, etc. We need not even bring up his documented history of lying throughout the 90's because there are witnesses to his lies surrounding the May 1st events.

In short, we don't know the answer to the specific question you asked, but JB does.

 

[truthspider]

CPH stated that he didn't even know who Joseph Brewer was til Gilbert went missing.

CPH also told Newsday reporters: "While Hackett told Newsday that he was flown by the Coast Guard out to the Flight 800 wreckage hours after the explosion, lowered onto the deck of a yacht and then swam through the fuel-slicked ocean "to examine a body," Coast Guard officials said that was impossible. "Absolutely not," said Cmdr. Jeff Pettitt, operations officer at Air Station Brooklyn, whose helicopters flew over the crash scene."

CPH also claimed he resigned from his post as SC EMS Director, "That version of his departure is "odd," Bradley said, considering Hackett asked to keep his job on a part-time basis, without pay if necessary, in combination with the Central Suffolk job. She said no".

"But some emergency officials, like Quinn, say they began to mistrust Hackett after hearing stories from him they suspected were embroidered or false: One day in February, 1996, Hackett mentioned he had just come from the scene of a roof collapse in Bay Shore, where he'd been crawling around in the wreckage, searching for survivors. Quinn, a member of the Brentwood fire department that answered that alarm, said he knew Hackett was not there."

Why <modsnip> believe a single thing out of the mouth of this person?

 

[truthspider]

Newsday (Melville, NY)

November 24, 1997

Edition: NASSAU AND SUFFOLK
Section: NEWS
Page: A04

Topics:
Index Terms:
SUFFOLK COUNTY.C PETER HACKETT.EMERGENCY.COUNSELING.

Suffolk's Trauma Care Bruised / Disputes still swirl around ex- director
Author: Elizabeth Moore. STAFF WRITER

Article Text:

Five hours after TWA Flight 800 exploded off Long Island's South Shore, Suffolk County's former emergency medical director said, he asked why the trauma counseling team he had called hadn't arrived.

Dr. C. Peter Hackett said he was told his order had been countermanded by David Fischler, the county's fire, rescue and emergency services commissioner. Furious, Hackett said, he got police to let the team past roadblocks, and in the next several days they debriefed hundreds of traumatized recovery workers in a marathon effort that won the county's emergency medical system a state award Nov. 15.

Fischler, who was in overall command of the scene in those first hours, said he only wanted the counselors to stand by until he could take charge of a chaotic situation. His communications director, Miles Quinn, admitted he may have "miscommunicated" Fischler's order but denies Hackett's account of the conversation between them - "I never spoke to him."

<modsnip>

Caption:
Newsday File Photo by John H. Cornell Jr.-Dr. C. Peter Hackett,

Copyright (c) 1997 Newsday, Inc.
Record Number: 963248187

 

[MrsPC]

CPH also told Newsday reporters: "While Hackett told Newsday that he was flown by the Coast Guard out to the Flight 800 wreckage hours after the explosion, lowered onto the deck of a yacht and then swam through the fuel-slicked ocean "to examine a body," Coast Guard officials said that was impossible. "Absolutely not," said Cmdr. Jeff Pettitt, operations officer at Air Station Brooklyn, whose helicopters flew over the crash scene."

CPH also claimed he resigned from his post as SC EMS Director, "That version of his departure is "odd," Bradley said, considering Hackett asked to keep his job on a part-time basis, without pay if necessary, in combination with the Central Suffolk job. She said no".

"But some emergency officials, like Quinn, say they began to mistrust Hackett after hearing stories from him they suspected were embroidered or false: One day in February, 1996, Hackett mentioned he had just come from the scene of a roof collapse in Bay Shore, where he'd been crawling around in the wreckage, searching for survivors. Quinn, a member of the Brentwood fire department that answered that alarm, said he knew Hackett was not there."

Why <modsnip> believe a single thing out of the mouth of this person?

All I did was post what CPH said. That doesn't mean I believe everything he says. Believe me, I've been around the block a time or two - I'm probably at least twice as old as you are. You call me gullible - I'll refer to you as "young whippersnapper"...lol.

I like #4
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=whipper%20snapper


I do believe you have a little bit of tunnel-vision though in this case. None of us know that Gilbert even died at the hands of a killer yet. Do we???

 

[dcgrumpy]

The number of possible scenarios as to how those 2 met is infinite, we as the public just don't know. It would be pure speculation to say exactly how, when, if they met. We do know JB has not spoken to the media about the so called drifter, we know the police are not being open with the public because it could ruin the investigation and we (think) we know that JB took a ride within the community and then SG started "acting weird" which I believe to mean she was drugged. More importantly, we know CPH has told various versions of his side of the story of May 1, and lied about calling MG. Whereas JB has done what the police told him to do: not talk to the media. For some odd reason, even though LE asked CPH not to talk to the media, he kept doing it, and kept doing it, and wrote signed letters....

Knowing how and when and if JB and CPH met doesn't impact our ability to deduce who the guilty party is in SG's death. We know enough about both people, and the events surrounding May 1 to deduce who is the guilty party. If we have multiple witnesses who say that CPH told them he administered SG a sedative, then it really doesn't matter that CPH tells us he didn't, and he doesn't know JB, etc. We need not even bring up his documented history of lying throughout the 90's because there are witnesses to his lies surrounding the May 1st events.

In short, we don't know the answer to the specific question you asked, but JB does.

No we don't. Maybe you do, but most of us don't. <modsnip>
Credible witnesses? <modsnip>?

 

[truthspider]

No we don't. Maybe you do, but most of us don't. <modsnip>

Credible witnesses? <modsnip>

That we was for we the believers, those of us who can tell one someone is and has been lying to us again and again and again....

And yes credible grump, if the phone calls and the body in the backyard aren't enough for you, I can't help you. Do you think OJ killed his wife?

 

[truthspider]

big points to anyone who knows this reference...



Visions of Hackett&#8217;s Trial


DA: [walks towards Hackett] Did you kill Shannan Gilbert?

Hackett: No. [laughs]

DA: [picks transparent plastic bag containing a syringe off a table] Your Honour I&#8217;d like to present Exhibit A. [to Hackett] Is this your syringe?

Hackett: No.

DA: Yes it is.

Hackett: No it isn&#8217;t.

DA: We have your name on the order forms and it came from your home clinic.

Hackett: No you don&#8217;t.

DA: May I remind you that you&#8217;re under oath?

Hackett: Oh right. And I would never lie under oath &#8211; not to God. [laughs]



(I can't help but feel like we are dealing with a 5th grader when listening to cph squirm his alibi this way and that.)

 

[dcgrumpy]

That we was for we the believers, those of us who can tell one someone is and has been lying to us again and again and again....

And yes credible grump, if the phone calls and the body in the backyard aren't enough for you, I can't help you. Do you think OJ killed his wife?

Oh please, enough with the backyard.

 

[En Passant]

No, it does not imply that. But I do happen to think they were all killed by the same individual.




Others can accuse me of whatever they want to accuse me of and you can call it whatever you want to call it. I find public data on CPH and share it with interested parties. I draw my own conclusions and opinions from the data and occasionally share those opinions, I hope everyone draws their own conclusions as well because that is the point of crowdsourcing and collective intelligence. I believe in this method of solving problems as it relates to crime and that is the only reason I do what I do.

Can you decipher the difference between what I am doing and "starting rumors"?

Truth thank you. I found all the info & your thoughts extremely eye opening. Like Wow.

I do not believe you need to answer to people who mis represent. That is wasted energy & yours is good.

I now think "What If" CPH mom was a "" who couldn't be changed.....???? What if his father had something to do with this fact????

The dismemberment........than his own leg?>??
Did he want that done????
If all this is true about the book found near the AC4, that would be very interesting.

Now I wonder....what could his son be responsible for if ....watching his dad??????

I understand where you think the Doc is souly responsible but I still think JB is involved.

As for the JJ articles, IMO, they were ridiculous...staying drunk during serious important exchanges ...did not make him non partial, it made him suspect to me. It made me feel he is involved in covering up for ;people. It made me think either he is really a crazy person who gets off on hurting a victims mother. He had no place getting close to discredit MG. He obviously has an alcohol problem. Which than I realize, JB owns a liqueor store. Didn't JJ run the LISK site?
I find that whole group concerning & dangerous. I believe the clams will get steamed eventually. Unable to clam up anymore.... the authentic genuine concerns are with those who go under fire attacking posters & sticking out like a sore thumb on what the motive is.

I appreciate your opinion truth......I do not know why you are being bullied. I thought the info was brilliant & you really have invested in this case. Hats off!!!!
Keep up the incredible sluething. I am a fan.

You Actually had me open to this as a possibility.
Bravo

 

[the quiet girl]

Truth thank you. I found all the info & your thoughts extremely eye opening. Like Wow.

I do not believe you need to answer to people who mis represent. That is wasted energy & yours is good.

I now think "What If" CPH mom was a "" who couldn't be changed.....???? What if his father had something to do with this fact????

The dismemberment........than his own leg?>??
Did he want that done????
If all this is true about the book found near the AC4, that would be very interesting.

Now I wonder....what could his son be responsible for if ....watching his dad??????

I understand where you think the Doc is souly responsible but I still think JB is involved.

As for the JJ articles, IMO, they were ridiculous...staying drunk during serious important exchanges ...did not make him non partial, it made him suspect to me. It made me feel he is involved in covering up for ;people. It made me think either he is really a crazy person who gets off on hurting a victims mother. He had no place getting close to discredit MG. He obviously has an alcohol problem. Which than I realize, JB owns a liqueor store. Didn't JJ run the LISK site?
I find that whole group concerning & dangerous. I believe the clams will get steamed eventually. Unable to clam up anymore.... the authentic genuine concerns are with those who go under fire attacking posters & sticking out like a sore thumb on what the motive is.

I appreciate your opinion truth......I do not know why you are being bullied. I thought the info was brilliant & you really have invested in this case. Hats off!!!!
Keep up the incredible sluething. I am a fan.

You Actually had me open to this as a possibility.
Bravo

bbm
JJ did? Where is this info?
I have to laugh Tater Salad is not being bullied, he is strong enough on his own. Actually look at one of his last posts...
I rather like my tater salad and find him funny but can reach a little too far at times. Keep it up TS. :great:

 

[Just K]

Just to clarify: The book found at the AC dump site is not the book written by CPH's father. At AC it was "Beach Road" by Patterson. The book written by CPH's father is "The Last Happy Hour."

The confusion probably comes in because the writer, JJ, noted that he saw a copy of "Beach Road" in CPH's bookshelf.

 

[Just K]

Has it occurred to anyone that the title of CPH's father's book could be seen as a double entendre? The obvious being a reference to the common term for the "drinking hours" after work (let's say 5:00 PM-7:00 PM) but it could also be a reference to the last happy hour of a person's life or day. It is all very creepy, IMO.

 

[En Passant]

No we don't. Maybe you do, but most of us don't. <modsnip>

Credible witnesses? <modsnip>

I do not understand the comment "Most Of US".
That seems to be very misleading.
It is polite to speak for yourself....not all others as they have a voice & can wiegh in.

Why do you constantly infer FlukeYou.
1. He stated it is not him!
2. Are you more obsessed with posters or the Issue?
3. We can come on here & not be attacked as people are being by you & IMO a collected Group....so maybe thats the "KEY" to you referring to" most of us".

I hope this goes on record, I feel Truth is being BULLIED

I do not know him/her , I am a independant poster myself & I will not tolerate the Bullying either. I feel targeting is happening & I will write my concerns.

Keeping track of bullying is important. Bullys are made examples of IMO. Doesn't fly in this day & age.

This isn't about a popularity contest it's about murdered tortured individuals & we all have a right to be upset & try to get to the bottom of it, instead of those who credit & discredit every post. IMO

If the energy is used on finding clues or thoeries it's very helpful.
Agree to disagree, I know you all do not like me, due to constantly bothering moderater over petty issues. But you stick out like sore thumbs.

They say to many complaints from one on the FAQ that isn't productive.
Peace & keep it coming ...... Many of you are simply Brilliant & truth I like your latest

 

[dcgrumpy]

I do not understand the comment "Most Of US".
That seems to be very misleading.
It is polite to speak for yourself....not all others as they have a voice & can wiegh in.

Why do you constantly infer FlukeYou.
1. He stated it is not him!
2. Are you more obsessed with posters or the Issue?
3. We can come on here & not be attacked as people are being by you & IMO a collected Group....so maybe thats the "KEY" to you referring to" most of us".

I hope this goes on record, I feel Truth is being BULLIED

I do not know him/her , I am a independant poster myself & I will not tolerate the Bullying either. I feel targeting is happening & I will write my concerns.

Keeping track of bullying is important. Bullys are made examples of IMO. Doesn't fly in this day & age.

This isn't about a popularity contest it's about murdered tortured individuals & we all have a right to be upset & try to get to the bottom of it, instead of those who credit & discredit every post. IMO

If the energy is used on finding clues or thoeries it's very helpful.
Agree to disagree, I know you all do not like me, due to constantly bothering moderater over petty issues. But you stick out like sore thumbs.

They say to many complaints from one on the FAQ that isn't productive.
Peace & keep it coming ...... Many of you are simply Brilliant & truth I like your latest

What the heck are you talking about? I don't think I've ever mentioned Flukeyou's name before that post.

And the idea that truthspider is being bullied is hysterical. JMHO of course

ETA
I just did a search and I was correct, that is the first and only time I have ever posted anything about flukeyou

 

[MrsPC]

What the heck are you talking about? I don't think I've ever mentioned Flukeyou's name before that post.

And the idea that truthspider is being bullied is hysterical. JMHO of course

ETA
I just did a search and I was correct, that is the first and only time I have ever posted anything about flukeyou

I'm confused on the bullying thing too...

oh well, time for a cigarette

 

[the quiet girl]

Personally I would rather have posters get their info straight before misleading others with info they just throw out there. Which is the worst anyone can do to research, imo. On the other hand its a nice distraction when one will do this and claim others are, then they can simply fly under the radar.
oh well hopefully people can see through this

eta:
Also, I think it is good to question things otherwise anything can go unchecked and I do not feel it is an attack when done correctly.

 

[the quiet girl]

Has it occurred to anyone that the title of CPH's father's book could be seen as a double entendre? The obvious being a reference to the common term for the "drinking hours" after work (let's say 5:00 PM-7:00 PM) but it could also be a reference to the last happy hour of a person's life or day. It is all very creepy, IMO.

good point!

 

[En Passant]

The number of possible scenarios as to how those 2 met is infinite, we as the public just don't know. It would be pure speculation to say exactly how, when, if they met. We do know JB has not spoken to the media about the so called drifter, we know the police are not being open with the public because it could ruin the investigation and we (think) we know that JB took a ride within the community and then SG started "acting weird" which I believe to mean she was drugged. More importantly, we know CPH has told various versions of his side of the story of May 1, and lied about calling MG. Whereas JB has done what the police told him to do: not talk to the media. For some odd reason, even though LE asked CPH not to talk to the media, he kept doing it, and kept doing it, and wrote signed letters....

Knowing how and when and if JB and CPH met doesn't impact our ability to deduce who the guilty party is in SG's death. We know enough about both people, and the events surrounding May 1 to deduce who is the guilty party. If we have multiple witnesses who say that CPH told them he administered SG a sedative, then it really doesn't matter that CPH tells us he didn't, and he doesn't know JB, etc. We need not even bring up his documented history of lying throughout the 90's because there are witnesses to his lies surrounding the May 1st events.

In short, we don't know the answer to the specific question you asked, but JB does.

You have an interesting question......I have some too.

1. Why did the Doc call MG & say SG was in his rehab?
Doc first lied & when story was going to break he was given an opportunity to come clean....& guess what, he did...
Doc than stated he called MG

Why would he do something so stupid & lie & risk his career & reputation, It had to be pretty important, don't cha think???

Where did JB & SG go upon her arrival?????? JB took Shannan somewhere for 15 or so minutes???? Where? Could it have been THE DOCTORS HOUSE or in a certain location in the area MEETING the Dr HACKETT?????
Make sense if he administered a seditive like stated by Anderson, right????

So the Doctors plott gets much deeper......the type of mean spirited comments the Dr father made in his book is pretty damaging & any professional would put him right under a microscope, IMO. I think he harm's himself.....loves sympathy from others,,,,& is in full Masquarde Costume year round....
He plays security, he plays doctor he plays victim.....he is worthy of disecting himself surely if all this info is what it is. I believe it, as Doc is a pathelogical liar & has been caught...also a common trait of socio-path's.

I still believe Joesph Brewer is the one who trolls & picks up victims......
The fact that NO ONE knows if JB & doc are friends....has to be a joke right?

Security, Parties, tapes earsed after 911 calls were made from area, person claiming to be killed goes missing & the tapes were erased. Real Fowl Play. There were incriminating info of others on there in my speculation factor mode. Coincidence& COINCIDENCE times a 1000 of them ....equals conviction in my opinion.

There are way to many dirty hands involving that alone IMO.

 

[truthspider]

Nobody needs to worry about me being bullied, I have bullet proof skin and I gargle with a mouthful of razor blades each morning, so bring it on.

 

[truthspider]

So the Doctors plott gets much deeper......the type of mean spirited comments the Dr father made in his book is pretty damaging & any professional would put him right under a microscope, IMO.

(warning, this post is actually in defense of CPH)

On the subject of people being bullied by mean people, what do you guys make of CJH's use of the term "limping" to insult people. Am I being too sensitive, or was he too insensitive? I mean if my father insulted people by calling them a "no good, surf bum, computer dork, who drives a surveillance van" my feelings would be hurt. :laugh:

Is that not like a parent who has a child with down syndrome recklessly throwing around the word ""? It seems hurtful to me.



Newsday (Melville, NY)
May 16, 1986

Edition: NASSAU AND SUFFOLK
Section: VIEWPOINTS
Page: 101

Topics:
Index Terms:
LETTERS.
`Doonesbury' Is Not Funny
Author: Charles J. Hackett - Hempstead
Article Text:Regarding the letter by William J. Corbett [" `Doonesbury' Is Out of Place, May 8]: A number of reasons were enumerated for ditching Doonesbury or at least getting it out of the cartoon section. He left out the most compelling reason of all. Doonesbury is just not funny. In the '60s, its limping attempts at political satire might have been tolerated for protest value, but now G.B. Trudeau's pseudo-sophistication is nothing more than insulting drivel.
Copyright (c) 1986 Newsday, Inc.
Record Number: 103222484







Newsday (Melville, NY)
September 30, 1990

Edition: ALL EDITIONS
Section: IDEAS
Page: 02

Topics:
Index Terms:
LETTER.
Reno's Rancid Rhetoric
Author: Charles J. Hackett. Point Lookout
Article Text:Robert Reno's puerile condemnation of Gen. Michael J. Dugan was another example of the inability of your master of rancid rhetoric to demonstrate the perspicacity of a titmouse whenever he gets a chance to apply his limping logic to a sensitive issue. Back in the days when the press corps was more honorable, remarks like Dugan's would not have been reported - or published. Recently one of your readers suggested that Reno be transferred from the financial section. May I suggest that the comic section might be appropriate.
Copyright (c) 1990 Newsday, Inc.
Record Number: 1006043218