The question phase continues: Arias on the stand for the 18th day #83

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nurmi's objection to the blood is that it could have been many other wounds that have been testified to?

Wow, so he's admitting to these all these wounds in 62 seconds?

That was exactly what I thought when he said that! Seemed like a tactical error
 
oh Nurm's

Picture22939_zps70bc9b9c.gif
 
hmmm, she states she shot him , before the supposed verbal death threat.
I smell burning toast again.
 
It doesn't matter if it was slitting his throat or the stab to his heart. The fact still remains she would have to grab the knife and start the knifing attack after shooting him all within 62 seconds.
 
Did the expert say that there was no way Travis could have spoken after he was shot? I missed that whole testimony.

With the type of injury he received to the head he would immediately be incapacitated

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
 
Her story is completely unraveling before the juries very eyes. Thank you Juan Martinez and thank you JA for being sick enough to involve a photo shoot in your murder plans- Justice for Travis!
 
I agree Steph. I wonder if he put her on or she demanded to be on? :P

I know all the experts are saying with a Self Defense claim, she had to take the stand.

They must mean she had to in order to explain it.. Not she had to legally, she had no choice.

I am certain she would have done better not taking the stand. Better how? Not sure, but this sure isn't going well
 
I can't believe she said that Travis could of had the knife!!! JM should have asked her if she thought TA cut his own throat. jmo
 
I wonder if she actually thinks that people believe her? Like she wont back down from this ridiculous story. There is no way in 62 seconds that could happen. Yet she still keeps talking like it is the truth.

She has just taken out of any realm of self defense.
 
WHYYYY is Nurmi decked out in green??? Even his socks! Wilmott too. It's not St Patricks Day.
 
Ugh! cnn live switched over to Pope coverage, and radaronline 'experiencing tech difficulties". Anyone still getting a livestream?
 
I think Juan's got her backed into a corner that she can't get out of.

You want to go with her fictional tale, there's no way it's plausible. Even if you buy it, it's premeditated.

More likely, it's not. She's cooked either way. No matter how you view it.
 
Juan just got her to admit that she didn't HEAR ANYTHING while getting away. In previous testimony, she said she heard his "Footsteps" coming after her.

I was waiting for her to mention the footsteps! Hilarious!
 
Didn't know where that knife went - after the first cut (of the rope) don't remember where it was. . . . don't remember where knife was - after the shooting as you are standing there - the fog doesn't have to remember - not a good thing for your memory is it? Does it enhance or improve your ability to remember? I don't know how memory works in the brain.

Fog increases ability to remember
I wouldn't say increases = I don't know I don't remember

Instances where TA would come after you and abuse you and that would create memory issues. . . . according to you you are the only one that knows about you when this fog rolls in

I don't have an understanding of what happens - just can describe it as best I can . . .. I wouldn't say the fog helps memory . . . .
still don't know where the knife is in your fog
I don't know - today as I sit here I don't know where the knife was - I might have remembered on June 4th .. . . he cut the rope and I don't know where he put it.

you remember him cutting the knife but not where he put it
that was 2 questions . . . it could have been nightstand, or closet

you have shot Mr. Alexander - you by necessity had to go look for the knife
I don't know how to answer
you didn't have knife in your hand - you needed to go get it from somewhere
I guess - I don't know
objection - argumentative
sustained

you needed to go get that knife at that point
no it is possible TA grabbed the knife first - I remember testifying I didn't hgave the knife in my hands with the gun

all in the same moment when he was lunging @ me
didn't have the knife in his hands
we both go tumbling -
you never told us he had the knife with him - does he have the knife or not?


you agree you didn't know where knife was and TA didn't have it - then it would take time to go and find it
I didn't know where the knife was
right it would take time to go find it
object- her memory now or awareness @ that time
can you repeat question

I don't know answer to that
you don't think a movement such as a step takes time

Even if knife was there you grabbed it
I guess I don't remember grab
if knife was in the bedroom would have taken more time than if it was in the closet
I don't remember it being in the closet
question is about time - if knife was in the bedroom or closet as opposed o the bathroom It would take more time
I guess because we were in the bathroom when we fell.

I guess under that theory it would take time I guess
like you don't know about time - you have owned a watch some point in your lifetime
object - arguementative - sustained

62 seconds - what you are telling us - under your scenario - you get body slammed - you run down the hall - go in the closet back up, shoot TA, after you shoot you picked up the camera - said it was only possibility - and he ran down hall

object argumentative lack foundation
overruled

possibility
I am asking within 62 seconds you drop camera - exhibit #161 that in the 62 vseconds that photo and 162 you are body slammed, get away, go down hall, go in closet, get gun, shoot him, he goes down he says f@cking kill you b!tch . . . .

he didn't say F'n kill you b until after I broke away
he said it after you shot him and grabbing @ you and you able to get away
yes
then you had to go get knife for everything to occur
I don't know particulars going on in that picture
you deny that is your foot
I don't deny just don't know what is going on
you know timing . . . you see this is blood and blood only occurs when you get cut

another reason your scenario is impossible
object- argue - sustained

you say he gets shot
correct
goes down, holler @ you, you are able to stand up, f'ng kill you, you able to get a way
in fog all the time but I don't remember @ that opint

you haven't seen the knife - but you do have to get the knife in your hand for there to be injuries like in #180 right
object - beyond scope - approach

Thank you so much for doing this. Even though I'm watching, your transcript clarifies what I miss for one reason or another. You rock!:rocker:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
215
Guests online
795
Total visitors
1,010

Forum statistics

Threads
625,923
Messages
18,514,361
Members
240,886
Latest member
chgreber
Back
Top