The Rest of the Story...

To me, if there is FACTUAL evidence, or if one has good reason to believe, that a man married off his barely 15 year old daughter to a 35 year-old man the same night he, himself, married a 11-13 year old child, there should be a court order prohibiting him and the 35 year-old man from contact with that child. Malonis sought that court ordered protection for her client. I see no fault in that.

Me either. But the restraining order isnt for either of those men. It was for Willie Jessop. They didnt want him to as they put it "threaten" her.


No Sarah, but there is a Teresa. There's probably a daughter of Wendell Neilson and another wife of Raymond. And there is apparently also one or more 11-13 year-old daughter(s) of Merrill Jessop. TX may have also discovered a few others too. Personally, I'm glad we found them. Maybe we can help them and prevent other abuse by knowing about them. Their existance exposes a problem and gives truth to many of those pesky 'apostates' accustions, those accusations the FLDS have said are the lies of profligates out to get them.

What are your thoughts on the fact that "we" also found Billy Dan Carroll, the CPS worker who raped over 20 girls some as young as 8?


CPS had to go in if they believed the calls by 'Sarah' to be genuine (and there are no facts to prove they did not.)

1) She was calling from out of state

2) They waited 3 days after getting her distress calls to go in. A lot went on during that 3 days, no?


Rapes in the temple, who knows? That may or may not come up later on in court. It would be icky, but not a major deal.

Either you have just cut yourself out of the group thinking that predominated threads #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 and #6 in this forum or you were a cool headed thinker all along. Either way, I appreciate and respect what you are saying.


These people were marrying too young teens. THAT is the issue. It seems (although hasn't been yet proven in court) to be a FACT.

YES! A fact! They should have kept up when Texas said 14 wasnt ok anymore!

Graves? Who cares?

Again I am impressed with your cool head on this.

As long as everyone had a death certificate, I don't see what the problem is. They did have death associated death certificates, right?

I dont know what they had but they had enough to make CPS and the state back off and view it as legit. One grave was a toddler that died in a car accident. One was a woman who died of breast cancer. One was an old woman. (I think going on memory - maybe someone else will know)

Broken bones, that seems to have been nothing. But that was basically just grist for Nancy Grace anyway.

I completey agree that it was.

What facts can be proven in court, who knows? But, I'm betting the FLDS ain't going to love "them facts."

Well we will have to see how it all plays out. With Billy Dan Carroll, we have a clear cut case of a 53 yr old man having sex with an 8 year old little girl.
If people were equally concerned about that case I would feel this was really about justice and the well being of children - instead of being about something else entirely
 
Anyone think we will EVER see the same amount of outrage expressed over this as has been expressed over the FLDS men?

Billy Dan Carroll spent the better part of the past three decades assaulting and raping dozens of victims -- from girls as young as two years of age to adult women whom he lured to his home and then drugged into unconsciousness.

His alleged acts ("alleged" because Mr. Carroll has yet to be convicted of a crime) are reportedly documented on videotapes kept in his possession.

Austin police Sgt. Brian Lloyd, a 22-year veteran child abuse investigator, has rarely seen the like of Mr. Carroll, who he describes as “the worst of the worst….

Several of these children were abused multiple times.”

One six-year-old girl was allegedly raped twenty-three times.

This was done, incidentally, without sending in SWAT operators in paramilitary drag and deploying an APC and sniper teams.


The search warrants and all photographic evidence against Mr. Carroll have been sealed, which is entirely appropriate: It wouldn't be wise to taint the jury pool against the suspect by publicizing salacious (and speculative) details or circulating lurid photographs.




Carroll isn't the only opportunistic sexual predator recently uncovered in the Texas child welfare system.


Roughly a year ago, a 13-year veteran Child Protective Services caseworker named Frederick Shavers was arrested and charged with sexual misconduct involving a 15-year-old girl whom he was supervising. According to police in Grand Prairie, there was "a mountain of evidence" that Shavers began a sexual "relationship" with the young girl -- an unwed teenage mother -- when she was thirteen years of age.


Shavers was 37 years old and married with two children at the time of his arrest.

This means he was 35, and his inamorata was 13, when they began their affair.

Gee golly Ned, it seems to me that Mr. Shavers was doing exactly what the agency that employed him said was happening at the YFZ Ranch. The significant difference here, of course, is that CPS didn't bother to prove any of the things it professed to "know" about the FLDS community -- and Shavers was forced to resign in April before being arrested last June.


Furthermore, it appears that this was not the first time that Shavers had been accused of sexual misconduct and other improprieties. According to the Dallas News, Shavers "has been the subject of several prior CPS inquiries" regarding his conduct.


In 1994, a 12-year-old girl "accused Mr. Shavers of kissing her during horseplay at a pool in Greenville."


Remember, Shavers at the time of his 2007 resignation had been with CPS for thirteen years; that meant that the first allegation of sexual misbehavior came immediately after he was hired by the agency. And his work record ended with allegations of suborning perjury from a child witness.


Shavers supervised an estimated 600 children during his career as a caseworker. His case records are under police scrutiny on the assumption that other children were abused in various ways by the former child-saver.


But CPS, of course, did nothing wrong in keeping Shavers on the payroll for over a decade. Agency spokeswoman Marissa Gonzalez insisted that CPS "handled Mr. Shavers appropriately during his career," observes the News: "I think each of those incidents was handled appropriately."


Let us be clear about an important distinction: There are no due process considerations regarding a job on the public payroll.
It's not necessary to prove an allegation beyond reasonable doubt in order to terminate the employment of a bureaucrat accused of a sexual offense against a child.
Had CPS been genuinely interested in child safety it would have excised Frederick Shavers from their roster in 1994.


But Shavers was given the benefit of every doubt. The same was quite possibly true of Billy Dan Carroll. The innocent FLDS parents, of course, enjoyed no such deference.
 
Billy Dan Carroll is scum and I for one am just as outraged by him as I am of the FLDS men. I would show absolutely No Mercy to a sick pervert like that:mad:

An eight year old child and him 53:mad::mad::mad:
 
Sen. Reid says Polygamy is a "Form of organised Crime"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,390070,00.html

I read your links too Ciara! :)


I think Sen Reid is a grandstander (IMO)

But I did like the thinking of the Utah Attorney~


Utah U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman, however, warned against using too blunt an instrument against polygamists, who are reclusive and cloistered. Saying rather than forming a task force to crack the surface of polygamist organizations, "subtle, more covert methods may be properly employed."

Thanks for the link!
 
I figured it was about time I stuck one up Glow instead of letting everyone else do all the work:)
 
Instead of an "aggressive effort" to apprehend (as the Texas Attorney General recommends) couldnt they just tell the FLDS who they want and let the men step forward?



FLDS Willing to Cooperate with Texas Authorities



On Tuesday, July 22, 2008, the grand jury in Schleicher County, Texas, delivered indictments against Warren S. Jeffs and five unnamed members of the FLDS Church. An indictment is a formal accusation and does not amount to a finding of guilt. The grand jury merely determines if there is enough evidence to require the accused person to stand trial on the alleged offense.

According to an AP article of July 23, “The identities of the Jeffs’ followers who were indicted were not released Tuesday because the indictments remain sealed until authorities can arrest the men.” Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott is quoted as saying, “There will be an aggressive effort to apprehend them.”

We are deeply concerned that this “aggressive effort” not involve another raid by Texas authorities on the YFZ community near Eldorado. The last thing our women and children need is the additional trauma associated with such an action.

When Sheriff Doran and the Texas Rangers arrived at the gate of the YFZ Ranch in April searching for Dale Evans Barlow, our people gave full cooperation, located the man requested, and allowed the sheriff to talk to him on the telephone. The massive military force used to invade the community was entirely uncalled for. As the raid by Arizona authorities in 1953 also attests, the FLDS are a peaceful, nonviolent people.

The same AP article of July 23 quotes FLDS spokesman Willie Jessop as saying, "We're actually quite shocked. As soon as we know who they're looking for, we'll try to face it. We believe in our innocence."

Willie Jessop told the Salt Lake Tribune, "As soon as we know who they are looking for we will make contact with the sheriff's office and make arrangements for those people to appear on the charges."

http://www.truthwillprevail.org/index.php?index=0&parentid=1
 
One of the most alarming things surrounding the FLDS case has been the issue of government and its power.

How much is too much? Who ultimately has control of what goes on in our homes? "

Who decides what is enough - what is too much?

Where are the lines drawn in parenting? Educational choices? Religion?

The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to debate two bills that could give the federal government unprecedented control over the way parents raise their children – even providing funds for state workers to come into homes and screen babies for emotional and developmental problems.

The Pre-K Act (HR 3289) and the Education Begins at Home Act (HR 2343) are two bills geared toward military and families who fall below state poverty lines. The measures are said to be a way to prevent child abuse, close the achievement gap in education between poor and minority infants versus middle-class children and evaluate babies younger than 5 for medical conditions."

If you're not in the military or below the poverty line - as determined by the state- maybe this wont interest you.

The ongoing government harassment of the FLDS is where precedents will be set that either hold the line on the Constitution as it reads now, or change where that line is.

Another good reason to pay close attention to what happens with the FLDS.
 
Some new developments....

First here is a description of a term that appears in the linked article...

Suspending Discovery :

Suspends everything. Stops the process. Covers up the State’s lack of evidence to support probable cause.



and here is the article -

FLDS order: Judge Walther in Texas CPS con game with Charles Childressby Kurt Schulzke

Tonight, Judge Barbara Walther and U. of Texas law prof Charles Childress cackle quietly, together, in her chambers, while big media applaud Walther’s order severing the case of 330 FLDS children into mother-based groups. Meanwhile, other attorneys on the case stare in disbelief at yet another constitutional and ethical violation by Judge Walther and Texas CPS.

It is good that Judge Walther has finally accepted — at least superficially — that individual FLDS families are entitled to separate consideration. However, this order and the process that produced it carry distinctly bad news for the FLDS or for other Americans who believe in due process and the rule of law. Some of the bad news is this:



“Discovery” refers to the process whereby the FLDS parents and children get access to whatever evidence the State may have to justify the continuing presence of CPS in the lives of FLDS families. Ever since the State stole personal records and gather DNA samples back in April, it has refused to share that information with attorneys representing FLDS parents and children. Staying discovery allows the State to continue to stall and pretend is has evidence justifying the State’s refusal to allow the FLDS to return to their homes in Eldorado, Texas.

The worst news is that the entire, unconstitutional case against the 330 children in the order (yes, it is against the children) should have been dismissed, period, and was not. CPS or the Texas Rangers should be required to open new cases, one-by-one on the basis of individualized probable cause which, for most of these people, does not exist.

Why FLDS attorneys did not insist that Walthers hold a hearing on a motion to dismiss is itself worthy of some investigative reporting. I think a game theory dynamic has set in, in which individual attorneys are in a dysfunctional equilibrium, thinking they are best right where they are when, in fact, they are not. I don’t want to call it a prisoner’s dilemma, because unlike the classic prisoner’s dilemma, few or none of the FLDS hostages (they’re still hostages) have likely committed any crime. But equilibrium has set in, preventing individual FLDS attorneys from objecting to Walther’s crimes against the Constitution.

This is a perfect illustration of Justice Harriett O’Neill’s collaborative, therapeutic justice* approach to CPS cases: CPS and the courts working together in blatant disregard of essential constitutional checks and balances. Judge Walther secretly signed the severance order on Thursday, July 24 — while Harry “Wormtongue” Reid distracted the FLDS in Washington — and held it back until just after noon on Friday.

It came as a complete surprise to the AALs representing the FLDS kids. One remarked, off the record, “I bet the press release failed to mention the suspension of discovery or that this was all ex parte with no notice to any of the attorneys.”

Ex parte, for non-lawyers, means in essence, “talking to only one side of the case.” Judges are not supposed to do it. Fundamental to our Constitution is the idea that all parties to a case must be given the right to be there, participating when any other party communicates with the judge. The Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(B)(8), flatly prohibits ex parte communications (see below).

Only Texas CPS knew that Charles G. Childress (one of Harriet O’Neill’s fixers) had delivered a motion to sever the cases and stay discovery. As with Harry Reid, in Washington, no one but the anti-FLDS Texas CPS had any opportunity to be heard on the merits of the CPS motion. Her Honor just signed the order, kids, parents, Constitution and statutes be damned. Her first love is Texas CPS. The order and her excuse for “process” prove it. (Childress, by the way, having trained the AALs against whom he will now litigate, has taken over as lead Texas CPS counsel on the FLDS case.)

The order means that hundreds of children, mothers and fathers will remain in limbo — unable to disprove their guilt (that’s how things work in a CPS case, not just in Texas) — for as long as Judge Walther wants them to be there.

Not for the last time, let me say: Every father and mother in America should be afraid, very afraid. This could just as easily happen to you. And no one would hear you scream because you would be all alone.

If you’re interested in know how Judge Walther is supposed to behave, take a close look at the following excerpts from the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, with special attention to Canon 3(B), Section 8:

Texas Code of Judicial Conduct

Canon 3(B)

(5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice.

(6) A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status, and shall not knowingly permit staff, court officials and others subject to the judge’s direction and control to do so.

(7) A judge shall require lawyers in proceedings before the court to refrain from manifesting, by words or conduct, bias or prejudice based on race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status against parties, witnesses, counsel or others.This requirement does not preclude legitimate advocacy when any of these factors is an issue in the proceeding.

(8) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, the right to be heard according to law. A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications or other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties between the judge and a party, an attorney, a guardian or attorney ad litem, an alternative dispute resolution neutral, or any other court appointee concerning the merits of a pending or impending judicial proceeding. A judge shall require compliance with this subsection by court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and control.


http://iperceive.net/flds-order-judge-walther-in-texas-cps-con-game-with-charles-childress/
 
Also in the news -

TEXAS ISN’T FINISHED ABUSING THE CHILDREN ON THE RANCH

In a mindless maneuver that had to come from the Governor’s office, 3 Apache Attack helicopters swooped into the Ranch compound in Eldorado Texas, sending children working their gardens and milking cows screaming for shelter believing another attack by armored personnel carriers, snipers with machine guns and swat teams in full dress battle gear were once again coming back to kidnap them.

Coming in low and fast, the aircraft, with guns bristling from every hole and door available, circled feet off the ground as clouds of sand and dirt billowed into the air pelting the children as they ran terrorized by the site and the remembrence of the earlier attack just month’s earlier.

If this is the State of Texas’s idea of how not to abuse children, they are doing as miserable a job of it as CPS did while their victim’s were in their care for 8 weeks beginning on April 3, 2008

It takes a very special breed of people to abuse, terrorize, emotionally and psychologically cripple women and children, but CPS, the Texas Rangers and the local residents appear to have what it takes to be really good at their jobs.

http://www.flds.ws/
 
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE TAKES JOY RIDE TO RANCH


With nothing better to do for kicks, 3 Apache Attack helicopter crews based out of Dyess Air Force Base took a joy ride Saturday and had nothing better to do than fly at roof top level scattering children already terrorized by Texas Law Enforcement and CPS.

I had thought that all the macho Rambo garbage was taken up between the Rangers and the local Barney Fife’s, but I guess I was wrong. I don’t really understand why grown adults receive such pleasure out of seeing how much harm and pain they can heap on people, especially children, but I guess it must be this “Texas” thing.

Haven’t you done enough to these people? Don’t you have even ONE decent bone in your body? Have you no SHAME!

It’s not credible that this was an “Accident”. That Temple is now one of the most recognized buildings across the United States. In the middle of barren nothingness it sits there visible for miles from the air. These children have been hurt enough, leave them alone

http://www.flds.ws/2008/07/26/dyess-air-force-base-takes-joy-ride-to-ranch/
 
I havent been able to find a press release on this but apparently the link above this one stated the wrong type of helicopter. Here is his correction.


TEXASS UPSET: “JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS” DECRIED.

Let me begin this post by saying to all those English major’s out there that the headline contains no typo.

Yesterday’s little stunt of terrorizing the children of the Ranch is being met with a great deal of criticism out there from the good old boys. The fact that the appearance of three helicopters hovering mere feet of the grounds of the Ranch directly over the heads of the children who were running in stark fear of yet one more attack on them didn’t bother the good old boys one bit, they never addressed the moronic move. What they are enraged about is my “Jumping to conclusions” about the great State of Texas, and my audacity of blaming them.

I hear no outrage from them about “Jumping to conclusions” concerning the original kidnappings. They sit back now on their barstool’s (There I go again!) and point to 6 indictments as justification for the original hoax attack and the taking of the children . NOT ONE of the original conclusions that the State used for taking the children has born any fruit for them. Are the good old boys “Outraged” at CPS?

Are they outraged at Cockerell’s idiotic conclusion that the “Broken bones “Seen” on the children was indicative of a pattern of abuse? Can we now conclude that since two children who received broken bones while kidnapped indicates a pattern of abuse by the State? Why not?

The good old boys scoff at the term “Tank” when describing the armored personell carrier that rolled against the children. In fact, it’s very existence, no matter what we called it was denied right up until the time the pictures were distributed to the press and they could no longer lie their way out of it.

They are outraged that the choppers were NOT Apache Attack helicopter’s, they were blackhawk helicopter’s. This, in their eyes excuses the incursion.

They are outraged that the choppers did not come from this Air Force Base, they had to come from that Air Force Base. This makes it somehow different to the children’s fear and terror?

Were it not for “Jumping to conclusions”, malfeasance, ignorance, fraud, deceit, greed, incompetence, child abuse and neglect, un Constitutionally depriving people of their rights and kidnapping by the State of Texas, we would not have 465 running away from helicopters, but running towards them as any normal child would do.

Some good old boys are outraged that I will not post opposing comments on this site. I have no problem with any post that contains a legitimate e mail address (Which is not made public). If you have convictions, be man or woman enough to stand behind your comments unless of course if you are ashamed of them and feel the need to hide in anonymity. Y’all may not like what I have to say, but you know exactly who said it, and I stand behind what I have to say with my name out front and center.

The children of the Ranch are no longer “Normal”. The State of Texas made them that way by “Jumping to conclusions.”, so if you want to be outraged, look to that moron of a Judge, CPS, “Sheriff” Doran, and the paid professional victims you were so willing to give credence to.

The atmosphere around the ranch is one of concern, mistrust of the outside world, fear, apprehension and extreme vigilance. Texas made it that way by illegally taking their children from them (Your Supreme Court) If they see a formation of military aircraft bearing down on them and their children, they get understandably upset and sound the alarm to people outside their wall’s that they know will tell the outside world what is really going on, and not the softball pablum that the State spoon feeds to the mainstream media.

If it eases your conscience that they were not State helicopters but Federal, if it eases your conscience that were Blackhawk helicopters instead of Apache, if it eases your conscience that they didn’t come from a particular Air Force Base (Which the Air Force is not discussing), then congratulations, go back to your beer and pat yourselves on the backs.

For our part, we are not going to stand by and watch another Waco develop on that Ranch. If they are threatened as they were yesterday, we’re going to be jumping to a whole lot of conclusions, this I promise you.

NOBODY outside of the parents has told you the truth about what they have gone through and why. My conclusion to that is that you need to go back to the very beginning and read the stories you were told and figure out exactly who jumped to conclusions and how is it going to be fixed to bring Texas back from it’s shame and humiliation for what it has done to these innocent children.

http://www.flds.ws/2008/07/27/texass-upset-jumping-to-conclusions-decried/#comments
 
Rozita Swinton in Newsweek


Rozita is profiled in Newsweek, and for the first time the press (apart from your Modern Pharisee) wakes up to the cold calculating nature of the instigator of the YFZ raid.
"Yet there's a highly rational and calculating aspect to Swinton's alleged deeds. In the past few years, she has used at least nine cell-phone numbers—many of them prepaid, avoiding the need to register them—to orchestrate her ruses, according to police. And rather than slipping uncontrollably into one character or another, she has seemed to switch between them at will."
I pointed this out early on, saying that she showed calculating behavior by avoiding the camera in the police questioning she went through. I also pointed out the similarities between her mug shot and other calculating child abusers.
"Psychiatrists interviewed by NEWSWEEK say that although they wouldn't rule out multiple-personality disorder—a controversial diagnosis technically known as dissociative identity disorder (DID)—Swinton's behavior doesn't match the usual profile (none of them has personally examined her). 'People with DID typically have intense stories of their own abuse' and don't 'run around reporting on other people's abuse,' says David Spiegel, associate chair of psychiatry at Stanford University School of Medicine. Richard Kluft, a clinical professor of psychiatry at Temple University School of Medicine, says it's possible that Swinton suffers from other conditions, like factitious disorder, in which people have a need to be seen as ill and deliberately create symptoms to prove it."
I still strongly suspect the KEY phrases that Rozita keeps using need to be paid attention to. "You're saying I'm lying" she tends to say, or seems amazed that people think she didn't tell the truth, and then protests that it IS the truth, that it's "HER STORY."
Lies always have an anchor in the truth in my experience. Rozita is intent on proclaiming that the stories she tells are TRUE. Someone has fed her these stories or she has read them in case files. She now feels the need to tell them. I think it's important to know where these stories came from. I think Rozita BELIEVES they are true. Another alternative is that she is changing details of the story to mask their origin.
The Newsweek article also identifies Mary Catharine Nelson as her foster parent, but does not touch on the "Reverend" Nelson's connections with the publishing company that she published her books through. The article also uses stock photographs that were supplied by Swinton herself.
There is STILL more to the story, but at least someone looked at her in an unsympathetic way for the first time, in the mainstream media.


http://hughmcbryde.blogspot.com/
 
Monday, July 28, 2008

Fugitive Five do what's right


In light of the fact that I think the state of Texas is in the wrong, the FLDS Fugitive Five did what was right, they turned themselves in.

The Salt Lake Tribune had been reporting that they could not be found. Since they've turned themselves in, it's now time to know who they are.

The Dallas Morning News.-

"Three of the men — Merril “Leroy” Jessop, 33; Raymond Jessop, 36; and Allan Keate, 56 — face charges of sexual assault of a child and are purported to be “spiritual husbands” of young women who testified before the Schleicher County grand jury last week. A fourth man, Michael Emack, 57, also faces charges of sexual assault of a child. The fifth man, Dr. Lloyd Barlow, 38, faces three misdemeanor counts of failing to report child abuse. He’s purported to be the chief physician at the sect's compound outside Eldorado and is thought to have had information about young mothers there."


I guessed two of them, I should have guessed the Dr. Are we now going to start charging abortion clinic Doctors?

http://hughmcbryde.blogspot.com/
 
Are we now going to start charging abortion clinic Doctors?





That is of course a rhetorical question. We all know the answer is a big resounding NO.

We dare not take away the rights of thousands of lecherous mainstream men to impregnate girls and get rid of the consequences. Why that would interfere with their "rights"! :eek:


Meanwhile I feel I must be a pest and bring up reality and ask does anyone have any information on the case of Billy Dan Carroll?


I mean, after all, he spent the better part of the past three decades assaulting and raping dozens of victims while in the employ of the State of Texas.

Girls as young as two years of age on up.

Multiple times.

He has yet to be charged.

And he didn't turn himself in :rolleyes:


I'm sure that is just as big of a news item as the FLDS 5 is.


It must be me and my ineptness at finding ALL the links to the active pursuit of the case against
Billy Carroll.
 
I posted this in the links thread as well.

http://www.sltrib.com/Salt%20Lake Tribune Home Page/ci_10027362


Five FLDS men turn themselves in to Texas authorities
By Emily Ramshaw
The Dallas Morning News

Article Last Updated: 07/28/2008 10:09:02 PM MDT


Posted: 10:05 PM- AUSTIN, Texas - Five men from a West Texas polygamous sect wanted on charges ranging from sexual assault of a child to bigamy turned themselves in Monday, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced.
The men are being held at the Schleicher County jail. Those charged with felonies are being held in lieu of $100,000 bail each. Those men face sentences ranging from five years to life in prison.


And I'd like to also state that I have a hard time believing anything on the FLDS website.
 
Thanks for the link Lisalei!


I appreciate you stating your opinion also. :)
 
So what we have -


Warren Jeffs- already in jail, and DA Abbott says he wants him extradited to Texas.

Leroy Jessop, 33 — Sexual Assault of a Child and Felony Bigamy

Raymond Jessop, 36 — Sexual Assault of a Child

Allan Keate, 56 — Sexual Assault of a Child

Michael Emack, 57 — Sexual Assault of a Child

And Barlow on 3 misdemeanors.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
217
Guests online
492
Total visitors
709

Forum statistics

Threads
625,781
Messages
18,509,879
Members
240,845
Latest member
Bouilhol
Back
Top