The State v. Jodi Arias: break in trial until 28 January 2013 #13 *ADULT CONTENT*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #2,301
GS' calendar claims he was in Santa Cruz on 6/2 at a conference which started at 7pm. JA was in Lodi, CA which is 2 hours away when she stopped for gas and something to eat. JA claims to have seen a friend in Santa Cruz on 6/21On 6/3 she was in Pasadena at 8:41pm at Starbucks. It's a six plus hour trip to Mesa, AZ. If she arrived around 4am when did she have time for a side trip to Yorda Linda on 6/3??????? So someone is lying. jmo

I still think she didn't arrive until noonish on the 4th.
~jmo
 
  • #2,302
Kind of odd that a saint-like guy who's afraid of a chick, wants nothing to do with her, and trashes her in front of his friends, would have sex (much less anal sex) with this chick, isn't it?

Again, its not illegal to have sex as an adult. Where's the proof they had anal sex? (which also isn't illegal)

There are millions of "chicks" that get dumped every day, only a select few come back and slaughter their former partner.
 
  • #2,303
JMO, I don't really need to hear what kind of sex Travis had with Jodi to determine she killed him for no good reason. Since when is anal sex a reason to stalk someone then kill them? :sheesh:

When you don't have any other reason or legal defense left to play up to a jury? :waitasec: Always go for the shock value. Someone will hear anal sex and see that "behind" picture of her and assume she was victimized and he was the "bad guy".
 
  • #2,304
Were the fake letters ever released? Are they posted anywhere?

Good question. I haven't run across any of them. The National Inquirer did say that they are reserving the right to print them at some later date.
 
  • #2,305
A "big red flag" that he abused her?
I haven't seen anything relating to abuse yet. I will watch and listen to the defense side. jmo:seeya:

OK....be honest... who immediately thought of "the picture" when the "big red flag" was mentioned? My bad! Going to the corner now. :blushing:
 
  • #2,306
Again, its not illegal to have sex as an adult. Where's the proof they had anal sex? (which also isn't illegal)

There are millions of "chicks" that get dumped every day, only a select few come back and slaughter their former partner.
Did I say it was illegal? Did I say they definitely had anal sex?

The question was why it was relevant. I was answering this question.
 
  • #2,307
  • #2,308
:cow: Jodi is going to have to take the stand. I think she will. She will. The new lies will fly out of her one of three holes like stinky farts. Sorry, it's JMO.
 
  • #2,309
After today's discussion, I guess I need to rethink my "its good for a colon massage" excuse. (just kidding).
 
  • #2,310
Kind of odd that a saint-like guy who's afraid of a chick, wants nothing to do with her, and trashes her in front of his friends, would have sex (much less anal sex) with this chick, isn't it?

It may go to show that she wasn't really as stalky as he made her out to be. And if she really wasn't, and he was talking about her in extremely negative lights to his friends while continuing to see her on the side... The case for abuse might start to present itself.

I have never heard that TA trashed her in front of his friends. Nor did he report her for stalking. It was his friends who spoke among themselves and tried to convince TA she was not right for him. I have yet to see where his friends say he admitted to having sex with her of any kind. It appears they just presumed it was happening because of the way Jodi acted towards him in public. This is what I have heard up to this point. But if you have a link with what you are stating as fact I'd will indeed read it. Thanks. jmo
 
  • #2,311
  • #2,312
Kind of odd that a saint-like guy who's afraid of a chick, wants nothing to do with her, and trashes her in front of his friends, would have sex (much less anal sex) with this chick, isn't it?

It may go to show that she wasn't really as stalky as he made her out to be. And if she really wasn't, and he was talking about her in extremely negative lights to his friends while continuing to see her on the side... The case for abuse might start to present itself.

She was the one that drove across state lines to go get some more. Travis didn't really pursue her like she pursued him. Whatever was going on, she sure liked it, IMO.
 
  • #2,313
:cow: Jodi is going to have to take the stand. I think she will. She will. The new lies will fly out of her one of three holes like stinky farts. Sorry, it's JMO.

:floorlaugh:
 
  • #2,314
Does anyone know just how much $ Jodi was going to have to pay Travis back for the BMW she would never be able to drive. It really stood out to me today how much that was on her mind in the days immediately after his murder. Enough to ask the detective about it and FB Travis sister Tanisha to ask her about it. I am really beginning to wonder how much wiping that debt clean played into her plan.
 
  • #2,315
  • #2,316
One thing I just noticed in CH testimony. He says something like "what do you mean, Gus, she has already admitted that she murdered him in cold blood".
When exactly did the DT come up with the SD claim?
Please, be careful, CH.
 
  • #2,317
GS' calendar claims he was in Santa Cruz on 6/2 at a conference which started at 7pm. JA was in Lodi, CA which is 2 hours away when she stopped for gas and something to eat. JA claims to have seen a friend in Santa Cruz on 6/21On 6/3 she was in Pasadena at 8:41pm at Starbucks. It's a six plus hour trip to Mesa, AZ. If she arrived around 4am when did she have time for a side trip to Yorda Linda on 6/3??????? So someone is lying. jmo
Unless...she continued South from Pasadena to Yorba Linda, then went East to Arizona. That would account for the extra hour.
 
  • #2,318
While I am not one to try a case by media, Isn't all the bashing of Jodi without knowing the defense evidence character assasination? (your words not mine)

I am just not going to ride the Travis train until all the evidence is heard.
I am entitled to my own opinion even if it differs from your opinion. ]
I am simply saying that all the media hype about his character is contradicted by his anal sex theory. ESPECALLY, when he is being characterized as a great Morman. ESPECALLY, when he helped convert her to Mormonism and baptized her. In my church, their is responsibility with those whom you "bring in." To me, that is a big red flag.


BBM - Just because he knocked on the back door didn't mean she had to let him in (repeatedly by the looks of it). I think a person's character is more contradicted when they are are charged with premeditated murder, but that's just me.
 
  • #2,319
I want the list showing the names 996 ladies this Don Juan reported dated with some dates he had no intention of pursuing. I don't think there are 900 + women on this planet who would go out on a date with this guy. He reminds me of the dirty old uncle in the movie 'Tommy'.

He reminds me of the serial killer "Bill" in "Silence of the Lambs" movie.
 
  • #2,320
Did I say it was illegal? Did I say they definitely had anal sex?

The question was why it was relevant. I was answering this question.

Hopefully, the jury will not be convinced it is relevant.
I personally do not see how the issue of premeditation can be questioned in light of the FACT that a 27 year old confessed murderer consented to anal sex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
2,520
Total visitors
2,667

Forum statistics

Threads
632,181
Messages
18,623,249
Members
243,048
Latest member
katchea
Back
Top