The State v. Jodi Arias: break in trial until 28 January 2013 #19 *ADULT CONTENT*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #2,341
I think the forensics guy stated these were recovered from October 2006? 2007? Not sure if I heard the set-up correctly regarding this 'evidence'.

That is what I thought also. I guess they'll beat up on Travis for those years? The start of his deviant behavior? and abuse of Jodi?

I don't care if he made her bark like a dog, or let him pee on her.
I don't care if he had twenty men at a time, it does not have anything to do with his murder.

That is between him and his Lord, not me.

Jodi was his Jezebel and he was trying to break free. I look at Lisa, so young and innocent..she was that someone special. They would of made a lovely couple and wonderful parents together. It seems Travis took the concerns she had in the email and wanted to change things for her.
 
  • #2,342
Well, it came to a grinding halt before any evidence from that hard drive was admitted. The judge put a stop to it as soon as the prosecutor objected ..everything that came before the pics was just laying foundation.

But you're right - it was insufficient to have any evidence admitted without these clarifications. Maybe they'll get to that on Monday.
Of course. If the pics were not allowed to be admitted she (the judge) should have made that abundantly clear to the jury before releasing them to three days of thought. She didn't handle the situation at all. Maybe the peen picks freaked her out? Just not acceptable for her to have simply closed up shop on this.

MOO
 
  • #2,343
I dunno about that - I think it was mere shock value of these penis pics was meant to take away the relevance that the shock value of the CONTRASTING image JM showed Lisa Diadone that really brought the reality of what this trial is about, and what people are there for. In contrasting value, these images of the **!GIANT PENISES!** took the focus back out to shock value that is rooted in hilarity, and again irrelevant non-serious B*lls**t.
The jury is left with this impression over the long weekend.
There is no trial tomorrow, right? Someone just go ahead and tell me "no" even if there is so I can get something done ;)

I fail to see how Defense can show self-defense by showing an erect penis on a photo? Help me here, how did this booster the defense? We don't even know if this is Travis or who?
 
  • #2,344
People on here have said that the pics are not of Travis because he is not circumcised.

She made every effort to make sure that she was not identified with being at his house.

So why mail those pictures to herself unless she was hoping that it would be thought that some unknown lovers got into a fight with TA?

Remember, there was no Ninja story or self defense story at the time.

The only story concocted was that in no way was she there.

BTW, I do not believe that the pics of her in the camera were done by her. She was not supposed to be at his house, so to take pics of herself would serve no purpose. The camera was new, so no way would he have pics of her from a previous time months ago. She could not claim that.

These new penis pics.
Where does this fit into the self defense story? I do not get it.

The defense is happy about these pics. Why?
they got booty in the discussion

(not that it has not been there from the start)

They want to decimate, stomp on, and absolutely ruin the victim of their client.

They are trying to plant any and whatever seed of doubt they can with this jury and thank God for the prosecutor who
1)knows his case
2)knows his evidence
and
3)is fighting for what is right and just for Travis, his friends, his family, and all who knew and loved him.
 
  • #2,345
Me too. I'm getting the same queezy feeling I got following another trial a little while ago...

I cannot believe the judge didn't say a thing about this today!

I think she probably did when they had the sidebar.

But it's not the judge's responsibility or place to interject if the prosecutor does not make objections. I think Juan objected at the earliest opportunity and successfully -- the pics were not admitted and so far neither has anything else been admitted from the second mystery hard drive.
 
  • #2,346
I fail to see how Defense can show self-defense by showing an erect penis on a photo? Help me here, how did this booster the defense? We don't even know if this is Travis or who?

Right. We don't know whose computer this came from? Where the hard-drive came from? Or when exactly the pictures are from. And the judge allowed it all to transpire as if they had been discussing scheduling. ???
 
  • #2,347
Of course. If the pics were not allowed to be admitted she (the judge) should have made that abundantly clear to the jury before releasing them to three days of thought. She didn't handle the situation at all. Maybe the peen picks freaked her out? Just not acceptable for her to have simply closed up shop on this.

MOO

I would have liked to have seen some more concrete resolution of the issue as well, especially before a three-day hiatus.
 
  • #2,348
I dunno about that - I think it was mere shock value of these penis pics was meant to take away the relevance that the shock value of the CONTRASTING image JM showed Lisa Diadone that really brought the reality of what this trial is about, and what people are there for. In contrasting value, these images of the **!GIANT PENISES!** took the focus back out to shock value that is rooted in hilarity, and again irrelevant non-serious B*lls**t.
The jury is left with this impression over the long weekend.
There is no trial tomorrow, right? Someone just go ahead and tell me "no" even if there is so I can get something done ;)


RIGHT - nothing till Monday.

BTW - can you imagine what the dudes whose "bat's" those were in the photos think tonight? If identified, will they be called to 'testify' ???? Okay, bad little news junkie is gonna go clean or something! :seeya:
 
  • #2,349
Even if it is Travis, who cares?
She didn't have to murder him...........
over a photo.
IMO, JA is just evil........
 
  • #2,350
Going to the movies with family... I'm gonna forget all about penis pics and instead focus on the REAL meat today....

The jurors questions:)

Keep it real folks, don't get sucked into the DA's trap and lose interest in what was gained today,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #2,351
  • #2,352
People on here have said that the pics are not of Travis because he is not circumcised.

She made every effort to make sure that she was not identified with being at his house.

So why mail those pictures to herself unless she was hoping that it would be thought that some unknown lovers got into a fight with TA?

Remember, there was no Ninja story or self defense story at the time.

The only story concocted was that in no way was she there.

BTW, I do not believe that the pics of her in the camera were done by her. She was not supposed to be at his house, so to take pics of herself would serve no purpose. The camera was new, so no way would he have pics of her from a previous time months ago. She could not claim that.

These new penis pics.
Where does this fit into the self defense story? I do not get it.

The defense is happy about these pics. Why?

I think the defense was manipulating the jury by the mere NAMES of the Youtube videos, thinking that to the jury: "Daft Bodies - Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger" would sound like 🤬🤬🤬🤬, followed by the !giant penis! pictures. Shock! Horror!
Ugh….
 
  • #2,353
I'm watching this morning's testimony. The brother is testifying and I think Nurmi is really banking on there being a few Mormons on the jury who are so offended by Travis' breach of his religious vows as an elder, that they determine he asked for what he got.

I'm so confused as to how the fact that he did not adhere to his religious principles has a damn thing to do with whether jodi killed him in self-defense.
 
  • #2,354
This may not sound that serious(I get it) but really I really would like to know what is wrong with the judge? Is she having a few sips(In camera)? Odd! Very Odd! JMO :shush:
 
  • #2,355
  • #2,356
I think she probably did when they had the sidebar.

But it's not the judge's responsibility or place to interject if the prosecutor does not make objections. I think Juan objected at the earliest opportunity and successfully -- the pics were not admitted and so far neither has anything else been admitted from the second mystery hard drive.

What is your opinion on why the computer expert had these photos in his access? Was he going to eventually talk about them or was that a mistake on the defense side?
 
  • #2,357
  • #2,358
  • #2,359
I think she probably did when they had the sidebar.

But it's not the judge's responsibility or place to interject if the prosecutor does not make objections. I think Juan objected at the earliest opportunity and successfully -- the pics were not admitted and so far neither has anything else been admitted from the second mystery hard drive.
Geez. They could have picked up anyone's hard drive and had the "expert" extract whatever was on it and she allowed to go that far? Really? I can't believe it! She should have been more clear and strong about what had transpired before dismissing the jury.
 
  • #2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
110
Guests online
2,944
Total visitors
3,054

Forum statistics

Threads
632,513
Messages
18,627,831
Members
243,174
Latest member
daydoo93
Back
Top