beccalecca1
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
- Messages
- 856
- Reaction score
- 0
Here's the problem - for the DP/LWOP penalty case. No one had heard the drowning story for three years - not a peep - not from Mr. Baez, who along with his client, insisted the child was "missing" all those long years with his face on any media show that would have him.
No one, repeat, no one heard the drowning "story" until Baez's opening statements.
On June 16th, the LE gave FCA every opportunity to say it was an accident, but no - not a peep, just denial and kidnapping...
Why not fess up at that time.....er..um...a little matter of the duct tape and the swamp...
You mean no one in the public had heard this for 3 years, PT and the A's knew about this prior to trial.
...the As heard it from the media...according to Cindy's own words. The DT came on boards like this and picked every wild theory they could find. Not terribly creative, but I guess they figured they only needed 1 person to buy it.
The A's heard it from their attorney. They stated so in trial.
That doesn't mean much to me. They said a lot of things in trial.
BBM
I brought the original posts in to keep this in context. When I reply to a post, another post comes in replying to mine, etc etc; it seems to get completely out of context for some that comment on the last post I made.
Just so the post stays in context I figured I'd reply with the original posting so there is an understanding why I posted what I did.
