This thread is for the posters that believe Caylee is still alive # 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #121
hey. hows everyone today. Another day, and still Caylee is gone. I was just thinking about something Casey said. During her interview she said she was petrefied (sp) that she would never see Caylee again. That makes me wonder a few things. ( and yes this might be repeats of things but gosh this case is just taking so long and we all keep going in circles, whew just had to get that out!)

So with Casey saying that. It makes me wonder if she did A. hand her off to someone she knows, and told them to keep her. B. Sold her C. I wonder if she met someone who said they would take care of Caylee for a few days. Maybe Casey just trusted them enough without verifying a number and maybe the drop off was at the park, and they told her they lived at so and so sawgrass.. Thats why she went there to pick Caylee up. Then realize nope not here. ANd maybe she left Caylee with whoever for a few days before agreed to pick her up. These things happen right? Casey was to busy to really think about what she was doing. So now she handed her child off to almost strangers with out a cell number that work and no idea where they live. I can see her lying about the whole story because this sounds much worse... OK gotta run.. One of my kiddos is up from naps.

These things do not happen in my family! There is no decomp in anyone's trunk, there is no nanny that no one has seen, there is no missing child for 30+ days, etc. While I do hope Caylee is found alive, I cannot refute what has been released by LE. If she was given to someone, why not return her for the reward? Maybe since her family is not searching for her, she is in a better place . . .
 
  • #122
"A few days later I emailed her again asking about Katie.

She wrote back and said she had indeed spoken and e-mailed with Katie526. Cindy did not mention the rest of the email. "


Tricia said that CA did remember Katie. Most certainly an odd conversation that Tricia posted. I suppose only time will tell what they do. or maybe nothing will come of it. If anything, hopefully posters will remember to follow the TOS. errrr. :l

Bee:

I was referring to the first conversation Tricia had with Cindy, which you left out of your "snippet":

She said she didn't remember Katie but that didn't mean anything since she talked and e-mailed so many people. I agreed to send her Katie's post via email and she would tell me if Katie was being truthful.


There isnt anything for them "to do" if something is true on here, or protected under the 5th ammendment, there is no standing.

Secondly, I am not the least concerned as I hear they are out of funds and no attorney is going to be hosed into filing a frivolous lawsuit for free.
 
  • #123
These things do not happen in my family! There is no decomp in anyone's trunk, there is no nanny that no one has seen, there is no missing child for 30+ days, etc. While I do hope Caylee is found alive, I cannot refute what has been released by LE. If she was given to someone, why not return her for the reward? Maybe since her family is not searching for her, she is in a better place . . .

Gosh I have no idea where my mind was when i wrote 'these things happen'. I reread my post before clicking, but maybe at that time i understood it. But now it looks odd..
 
  • #124
Gosh I have no idea where my mind was when i wrote 'these things happen'. I reread my post before clicking, but maybe at that time i understood it. But now it looks odd..

This is so odd!!! Very unbelieveable in my eyes & my heart!!!
 
  • #125
Bee:

I was referring to the first conversation Tricia had with Cindy, which you left out of your "snippet":

She said she didn't remember Katie but that didn't mean anything since she talked and e-mailed so many people. I agreed to send her Katie's post via email and she would tell me if Katie was being truthful.


There isnt anything for them "to do" if something is true on here, or protected under the 5th ammendment, there is no standing.

Secondly, I am not the least concerned as I hear they are out of funds and no attorney is going to be hosed into filing a frivolous lawsuit for free.

You came in this thread and erroneously claimed that Cindy said she didn't know Katie. Now you are criticizing beetrue for leaving out a "snippet" that doesn't actually prove anything, since Cindy later said she did remember Katie.

Is there a factual point you would like to make that is germaine to the discussion?


I have to say, given your posts about your relationship with her, and her not knowing who you are is unfortunate. Peace to you
 
  • #126
just a word of caution, Serande, I would not go there!!! JMHO tho - peace out ( kk ducking )

Ummm.... Did Serande say something wrong?
 
  • #127
Bee:

I was referring to the first conversation Tricia had with Cindy, which you left out of your "snippet":

She said she didn't remember Katie but that didn't mean anything since she talked and e-mailed so many people. I agreed to send her Katie's post via email and she would tell me if Katie was being truthful.


There isnt anything for them "to do" if something is true on here, or protected under the 5th ammendment, there is no standing.

Secondly, I am not the least concerned as I hear they are out of funds and no attorney is going to be hosed into filing a frivolous lawsuit for free.


I think we were all a little shocked that at first she didn't remember Katie.. that is it. It sounded like they had a good line of communication. I was a bit confused by CA's FIRST statement as well. Lets not make mountains out of molehills, as it was a bit odd to some of us that is all. We have all read and know CA does indeed remember Katie..it's a moot point now. Not speaking for Blink but that is how I took her original post.
 
  • #128
Someone very childish changed the password on the spreadsheet documents that a few others and myself were using to keep up with different facts, connections and things to investigate.
I'm not sure why anyone would do it other than to just play games and taunt other members, but it definitely reveals one's character.


sorry to say this, but I saw that coming. I knew once you posted the pw and acct info something like this would happen. sorry it did. :(
 
  • #129
Bee:

I was referring to the first conversation Tricia had with Cindy, which you left out of your "snippet":

She said she didn't remember Katie but that didn't mean anything since she talked and e-mailed so many people. I agreed to send her Katie's post via email and she would tell me if Katie was being truthful.


There isnt anything for them "to do" if something is true on here, or protected under the 5th ammendment, there is no standing.

Secondly, I am not the least concerned as I hear they are out of funds and no attorney is going to be hosed into filing a frivolous lawsuit for free.


As long as we are clear here. Cindy did verify that Katie was telling the truth. She had spoken to her by phone and had exchanged emails with her.
 
  • #130
  • #131
  • #132
These things do not happen in my family! There is no decomp in anyone's trunk, there is no nanny that no one has seen, there is no missing child for 30+ days, etc. While I do hope Caylee is found alive, I cannot refute what has been released by LE. If she was given to someone, why not return her for the reward? Maybe since her family is not searching for her, she is in a better place . . .

This thread is for the few of us here that do believe Caylee is indeed alive,
Please respect that
 
  • #133
As long as we are clear here. Cindy did verify that Katie was telling the truth. She had spoken to her by phone and had exchanged emails with her.

agreed, we are, I was referring to the fact that on the onset she did not know who you were talking about. I found that relevant. Mistakenly, perhaps, but in any event I know am completely sure she knows her quite well. Thanks for the clarification.
 
  • #134
  • #135
You came in this thread and erroneously claimed that Cindy said she didn't know Katie. Now you are criticizing beetrue for leaving out a "snippet" that doesn't actually prove anything, since Cindy later said she did remember Katie.

Is there a factual point you would like to make that is germaine to the discussion?

CA could have said she didn't know Katie the first time because she didn't want to get her in trouble and wanted to make sure it was ok w/ Katie before acknowledging they were talking.
 
  • #136
You came in this thread and erroneously claimed that Cindy said she didn't know Katie. Now you are criticizing beetrue for leaving out a "snippet" that doesn't actually prove anything, since Cindy later said she did remember Katie.

Is there a factual point you would like to make that is germaine to the discussion?

Er, Um, well, first you would have to tell me what germaine means, then very probably, yes.
 
  • #137
sorry to say this, but I saw that coming. I knew once you posted the pw and acct info something like this would happen. sorry it did. :(


I am so sorry that happened also. Maybe only give it out in a PM to those you can trust.
 
  • #138
I am so sorry that happened also. Maybe only give it out in a PM to those you can trust.

I think whoever opens the account can change it again, by clicking the "forgot password" link. I would do that, and then keep it "close".
 
  • #139
I honestly did look it up in Websters and it wasn't there! I didn't know what it meant either and it must be french. In context, I am guessing it means pertinent or relative. (Yes, I was joking about the J Five...sorry. I know he spells his name with a J not a G.)
 
  • #140
Sorry, I misspelled the word: (why was I thinking of Germaine Greer?:waitasec:)

Germane: being at once relevant and appropriate
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
51
Guests online
2,201
Total visitors
2,252

Forum statistics

Threads
632,251
Messages
18,623,875
Members
243,066
Latest member
DANTHAMAN
Back
Top