Tim Miller: Possible Lawsuit against Casey

[Friday]

I'd say she perpetrated a fraud...a real big one...whether it's assumed that Caylee was murdered or dead from an alleged (loved the use of THAT word) drowning...it was Casey's doing.
JMO

True, and she perpetrated that fraud on a legitimate charity that doesn't even charge a token fee for it's services.

 

[Intermezzo]

Just got back from work....and I'm wide awake...

NavySubMom...Thank you for all the Twitter posts...I am just starting the thread and noticed all your Posts...MERCI!!!!

 

[Intermezzo]

2:56 CFNews13Casey: No allegation of gain for #CaseyAnthony says her attorney [via Twitter]


2:57 CFNews13Casey: #CaseyAnthony attorney Greene told me before hearing that even in rural Idaho, someone recognized him as Casey's attorney -Longo [via Twitter]


2:58 CFNews13Casey: #CaseyAnthony was not "enriched" at all by the search. Greene says this case opens the door for individual volunteers to sue -Longo [via Twitter]

bbm
Ya Right :floorlaugh: Greene said that :floorlaugh:

I wouldn't recognize him in Orlando..wonder if he can give us the name of the alleged person who allegedly recognized him in rural Idaho :floorlaugh:

 

[What'sThatClue]

bbm
Ya Right :floorlaugh: Greene said that :floorlaugh:

I wouldn't recognize him in Orlando..wonder if he can give us the name of the alleged person who allegedly recognized him in rural Idaho :floorlaugh:

Me either! :floorlaugh:

 

[IfIMay]

bbm
Ya Right :floorlaugh: Greene said that :floorlaugh:

I wouldn't recognize him in Orlando..wonder if he can give us the name of the alleged person who allegedly recognized him in rural Idaho :floorlaugh:

His Momma!? :floorlaugh:

 

[LambChop]

bbm
Ya Right :floorlaugh: Greene said that :floorlaugh:

I wouldn't recognize him in Orlando..wonder if he can give us the name of the alleged person who allegedly recognized him in rural Idaho :floorlaugh:

Was it his mother??? Funny IfImay......did't see your post......great minds think alike. lol

 

[logicalgirl]

Apparently there is a hearing today at 3:30pm to hear the objection to posting the deposition video.

Haven't seen anything suggesting it will be streamed or tweeted. I'm thinking the courts/press are "so over" making a fuss about OCA.

 

[cityslick]

I'm still having a hard time seeing where he has a case. It's never been proven in a court of law (or anywhere else) that Caylee 'drowned'. The only statement is JB's opening statement and last I checked, you couldn't use that as a 'legal' admission of anything in court.

 

[LambChop]

I'm still having a hard time seeing where he has a case. It's never been proven in a court of law (or anywhere else) that Caylee 'drowned'. The only statement is JB's opening statement and last I checked, you couldn't use that as a 'legal' admission of anything in court.

Wasn't it an admission? JB did not say "could" have drowned he said Caylee did drown. He is not suppose to knowingly lie. He can present theories but has to present them as theories as in, "She could have had her father's......." which is what he said in his opening statement. JB said Caylee died on June 16, 2008 when she drowned in the family pool. I don't think he is permitted to lie to the court, even during his opening statement. JB presented this as a fact, not a theory, which he could have only known if KC had told him. So that ship has sailed as far as whether this is KC's story or not. And, not that she could not have lied to him. But if the SA's office has a valid complaint why wouldn't TES? jmo

 

[Aedrys]

That is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard anyone say, seriously. JMO



:woohoo:

I hope her attorney is right and that it opens the door for all the searchers to sue her. Start getting CC receipts for everything and then when Tim wins ask for a notarized statement that you were involved in the search.

I really hope Jose was counting on a big payday for her and then he'd take a chunk. Do the judgments have to be paid before he can be paid?

ITA!!!! I hope they get to do a class action lawsuit against her. I really wish mom and pop could be included in these civil lawsuits too. I hate that they aren't. But at least Casey is going to suffer. How's that not guilty verdict working out for you, huh, Casey? Bwahahahaha!

Oh Karma, you dog, you are awesome!!!!! Poor Casey, she's going to have spend money on a disguise wardrobe...I love it!!!!

 

[cityslick]

Wasn't it an admission? JB did not say "could" have drowned he said Caylee did drown. He is not suppose to knowingly lie. He can present theories but has to present them as theories as in, "She could have had her father's......." which is what he said in his opening statement. JB said Caylee died on June 16, 2008 when she drowned in the family pool. I don't think he is permitted to lie to the court, even during his opening statement. JB presented this as a fact, not a theory, which he could have only known if KC had told him. So that ship has sailed as far as whether this is KC's story or not. And, not that she could not have lied to him. But if the SA's office has a valid complaint why wouldn't TES? jmo

Well, the the states case is predicated of the fact that she knowingly lied to LE and was found guilty of such. It's not been proven anywhere that Casey 'lied' to TES. Yes JB presented it as fact but it is not 'fact' in the eyes of the court.

 

[Oldsoul2]

That would mean JB lied to CA, as CA stated KC wanted her to know first how Caylee died. He did not say Caylee drowned as a theory, JB specifically said Caylee died on June 16, 2008 when she drowned in the family pool. Just because KC did not testify, she has not come forward in public and stated anything differently. Really does not matter how Caylee died to TES just that KC admitted through her attorney that Caylee died on June 16, 2008 and KC lied about the kidnapping. So defense and SA now agree Caylee was dead on June 16th which they both already knew.

Obviously juries have more of an issue with people lying than they do with the death of a child from the results of the murder trial. And let's face it KC will be asked to give a deposition in this case as well. Unless she comes up with another version we are stuck with the drowning excuse. jmo

Here's the beauty of this. In order for her to win against TES, she would have to detract her claim that Caylee was already dead. So here's the choice, go along with the ******** pool theory and pay TES back for making them believe your daughter was missing and not deceased or fight them with another lie and say at that time you didn't know where she was which would blow your cover...I already knew that eventually she will beg to go back to prison, if she doesn't land up dead first, after her karmic debt is paid.

 

[Cherry Baby]

Even if this lawsuit doesn't have the results we would like - anything that aggravates Casey is okay by me.

 

[Steely Dan]

ITA!!!! I hope they get to do a class action lawsuit against her. I really wish mom and pop could be included in these civil lawsuits too. I hate that they aren't. But at least Casey is going to suffer. How's that not guilty verdict working out for you, huh, Casey? Bwahahahaha!

Oh Karma, you dog, you are awesome!!!!! Poor Casey, she's going to have spend money on a disguise wardrobe...I love it!!!!

I'd prefer to see her have to deal with 500 small claims suits. :great:

 

[LambChop]

Well, the the states case is predicated of the fact that she knowingly lied to LE and was found guilty of such. It's not been proven anywhere that Casey 'lied' to TES. Yes JB presented it as fact but it is not 'fact' in the eyes of the court.

If it is not a fact and was not stated as a theory than what is it?

 

[cityslick]

If it is not a fact and was not stated as a theory than what is it?

It was an opening statement, it wasn't testimony. There is a difference.

 

[NavySubMom]

It was an opening statement, it wasn't testimony. There is a difference.

but unlike the GA molestation "theory", evidence in the way of CA testimony and photographs of Caylee going up a ladder and Caylee in the pool was presented, so IMO there WAS testimony that Caylee drowned in the pool.

IMO, the jury sure went for it......

and JB argued about the pool drowning in closing statements, because evidence was presented. He could NOT argue about the GA molestation, because NO EVIDENCE was presented about that.

that is how I see it, anyway.

IMO, MOO, etc.

 

[LambChop]

It was an opening statement, it wasn't testimony. There is a difference.

He mentioned it in closing statement, too and during the trial as fact. He also told CA that KC had told him to tell her that Caylee had drowned. Was JB lying to CA and the court???? jmo

 

[NavySubMom]

He mentioned it in closing statement, too and during the trial as fact. He also told CA that KC had told him to tell her that Caylee had drowned. Was JB lying to CA and the court???? jmo

In closing statements, an atty can only argue the EVIDENCE presented in court, Judge Perry said JB could NOT argue about the GA molestation, because no evidence, but JB COULD argue about the drowning, because CA testimony and photographs re: drowning were presented.

So, IMO, FCA through her atty, stated in the trial that Caylee drowned in the pool, and evidence was presented during trial about said drowning, so.......

and no statements to the contrary have been uttered since.

IMO, MOO, etc.

 

[2goldfish]

He mentioned it in closing statement, too and during the trial as fact. He also told CA that KC had told him to tell her that Caylee had drowned. Was JB lying to CA and the court???? jmo

IMO he was, he knows OCA murdered caylee IMO but I suppose that isnt the point here, the point is OCA cant have her acquittal and eat it too.


eta but then what the heck do I know, I never in a thousand years thought they'd pull the pinellas 12 from a random pool.